Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -100.9%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | $2M | $13M | $41M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $2M | $13M | $46M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4031.74 | 1180.21 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.98 | 0.66 | 2.27 | 3.13 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1239.89 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — | 100.0% | -16.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -126232.9% | -126232.9% | — | — | -1266.2% | -4259.3% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -239797.8% | -239797.8% | — | — | -1457.4% | -2635.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -100.9% | -100.9% | -65.6% | -158.4% | -1020.7% | -493.8% | — |
| ROA | -85.9% | -85.9% | -45.8% | -69.8% | -86.9% | -189.5% | -189.6% |
| ROIC | -37.9% | -37.9% | -5.5% | -14.2% | -84.9% | -269.1% | — |
| ROCE | -53.1% | -53.1% | -9.4% | -26.3% | -126.5% | -1048.1% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.39 | — | 1.67 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.38 | — | 1.54 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -659.24 | -659.24 | -4049.51 | — | -581.70 | -6.18 | -226.39 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | — | — | 0.07 | 0.06 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6666.35 | — | — | 2013.56 | 589.21 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M |
Imminent liquidity crisis
Based on reported figures, GITS trades at a P/S ratio of 4,031.74, which appears to be a statistical anomaly rather than a reflection of growth potential, as the company has failed to generate meaningful revenue since its 2021 inception, rendering traditional valuation multiples largely inapplicable for investors.
The extreme P/S multiple suggests that the market may be pricing the company as a speculative option on future platform adoption rather than an operating business. Given the negligible revenue base, investors should monitor whether the current valuation is supported by any tangible assets or if it represents a distressed asset pricing scenario.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's operating margin has reached an extreme negative level of -126,232%, highlighting a fundamental mismatch between the fixed cost base required to maintain the FANTOO platform and the near-zero revenue generated by its current user engagement model.
The reported 100% gross margin is likely an accounting artifact that masks the true cost of platform maintenance, which is currently being funneled through operating expenses. This structure implies that the company lacks the scale to cover even basic infrastructure costs, suggesting that profitability is not achievable under the current business model.
According to recent SEC filings, GITS has consistently reported negative ROIC and ROE figures, with ROIC reaching -11.1% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is actively destroying shareholder capital rather than compounding it through its platform development efforts or user acquisition strategies.
The persistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the capital allocated to the FANTOO platform has failed to generate any meaningful economic value. Investors should interpret these negative returns as a clear signal that the current business strategy is not creating a sustainable competitive advantage.
Based on the latest quarterly data, GITS's cash position has plummeted to a nominal $6,990, a stark decline from prior periods, which signals an immediate and severe threat to the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations and remain a going concern in the near term.
The current ratio of 0.03 in 2026Q1 confirms that the company lacks the liquid assets necessary to cover its current liabilities. This liquidity profile suggests that the firm is entirely dependent on external financing to survive, which may be difficult to secure given the lack of commercial traction.
The market frequently misapplies standard technology growth multiples like P/S to GITS, which obscures the reality that the company functions more as a distressed asset than a viable software-as-a-service platform, necessitating a shift toward liquidation analysis rather than traditional growth-based valuation metrics for accurate assessment.
Using P/S ratios for a company with $1,932 in annual revenue is fundamentally misleading because it ignores the company's inability to cover its fixed operating costs. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the remaining runway, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's survival risk.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GITS stock.
Global Interactive Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Global Interactive Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -100.9%. The historical average is -204.7%.
Based on historical data, Global Interactive Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Global Interactive Technologies, Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -126232.9% operating margin.