Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -62.8%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15M | $58M | $8M | $37M | $75M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $41M | $84M | $20M | $44M | $94M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.84 | 6.96 | 0.96 | 1.60 | 4.11 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.20 | 0.60 | 0.10 | 1.87 | 5.35 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.96 | 2.56 | 1.91 | 5.18 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | 32.6% | 50.0% | 47.5% | 21.6% | 45.8% | 49.5% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -323.2% | -323.2% | -380.5% | -156.4% | -74.1% | -31.3% | -33.5% | -21.4% | -11.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -658.9% | -658.9% | -314.5% | -24.5% | -303.7% | -35.1% | -41.8% | -12.4% | -1.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -62.8% | -62.8% | -50.2% | -33.6% | -503.6% | -57.2% | -49.0% | -14.8% | -1.2% |
| ROA | -46.4% | -46.4% | -34.5% | -8.4% | -101.5% | -26.0% | -18.5% | -7.0% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | -19.0% | -19.0% | -38.0% | -89.7% | -47.2% | -31.6% | -21.4% | -17.4% | -7.5% |
| ROCE | -27.3% | -27.3% | -52.2% | -76.9% | -34.4% | -36.3% | -22.3% | -17.4% | -7.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 1.81 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 1.18 | 0.14 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.26 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 1.40 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.57 | -0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.60 | -7.60 | -22.58 | -0.82 | -41.63 | -9.27 | -2.43 | -0.26 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 3.65 | 0.56 | 1.04 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 3.61 | 0.51 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 0.66 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 0.20 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.53 |
| Inventory Turnover | 10.64 | 10.64 | 11.41 | 15.26 | 9.54 | 108.30 | 36.73 | 42.04 | 44.53 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 141.24 | 420.19 | 108.98 | 106.90 | 32.23 | 48.75 | 49.17 | 25.97 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $101M | $11M | $6M | $23M | $20M | $23M | $23M | $22M |
Acute liquidity and solvency
According to recent market data, GNS trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 1.92, a valuation that appears to discount the company's inability to achieve profitability compared to established education peers like Strategic Education, which maintain significantly higher margins and more predictable earnings trajectories.
The current P/S ratio suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented edtech platform. Given the lack of positive P/E or FCF multiples, the valuation is entirely speculative and heavily dependent on the company's ability to avoid further dilutive capital raises.
As reported in financial statements, GNS has consistently generated negative returns on invested capital, with ROIC figures hovering around -6.4% in 2025Q2, indicating that the company is failing to create value for shareholders through its current deployment of capital into physical and digital assets.
The negative ROIC trend over the last ten quarters confirms that the company's investments in resorts and educational platforms have not yielded the necessary returns to cover the cost of capital. This persistent decay in returns suggests that the underlying business model lacks the efficiency required to compete with more established industry players.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, reaching -312 days in 2025Q2, which suggests significant challenges in managing receivables and payables effectively compared to the more stable working capital cycles observed in the broader education sector.
The erratic nature of the DSO and DPO metrics indicates a lack of operational control over the cash conversion process. This inefficiency forces the company to rely on external financing to bridge the gap between service delivery and cash collection, further exacerbating its liquidity constraints.
According to the latest balance sheet filings, GNS maintains a current ratio of 2.16, yet this figure masks a precarious liquidity position given the company's ongoing operating losses and the high probability of needing additional capital to sustain its current business operations in the near term.
While the current ratio appears superficially healthy, the lack of positive cash flow generation means that the company's liquidity is highly sensitive to any disruption in its ability to raise funds. Investors should monitor the cash balance closely, as the current burn rate leaves little room for operational error.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to GNS, as it obscures the company's high-cost physical asset base and fails to account for the significant capital intensity required to maintain its hospitality and education operations compared to pure-play software-as-a-service education providers.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the unit economics of student acquisition, as the P/S ratio ignores the fact that a large portion of revenue is tied to low-margin physical services. Relying on revenue multiples in this context may lead to an overestimation of the company's scalability and long-term viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GNS stock.
Genius Group Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Genius Group Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -62.8%. The historical average is -38.4%.
Based on historical data, Genius Group Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Genius Group Limited has 13.4% gross margin and -323.2% operating margin.