Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.3x · EV/EBITDA 8.1x · ROE 17.3%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.8B | $2.8B | $2.5B | $2.4B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.2B | $581M | $367M | $561M | $491M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.9B | $2.9B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.4B | $790M | $530M | $642M | $542M |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.27 | 8.86 | 6.69 | 8.46 | 4.02 | 8.15 | 10.25 | 9.90 | 7.10 | 37.67 | 20.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.47 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 1.34 | 0.66 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 1.24 | 1.29 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.47 | 1.42 | 1.49 | 1.76 | 1.05 | 1.70 | 1.76 | 1.06 | 0.76 | 1.30 | 1.22 |
| P/FCF | 41.75 | 13.20 | 117.55 | 11.60 | 13.11 | — | 36.18 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 13.07 | 12.91 | 97.75 | 11.18 | 12.82 | — | 33.19 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.42 | 1.30 | 1.44 | 0.83 | 1.29 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 1.41 | 1.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.05 | 6.99 | 5.68 | 7.14 | 4.03 | 7.77 | 10.55 | 10.20 | 7.08 | 10.74 | 11.29 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.16 | 6.61 | 5.35 | 6.54 | 3.68 | 7.95 | 11.18 | 11.06 | 7.14 | 10.69 | 10.72 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.90 | 126.99 | 12.45 | 16.44 | — | 42.48 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 31.2% | 33.5% | 30.8% | 29.8% | 25.8% | 24.0% | 21.4% | 20.9% | 21.7% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 22.7% | 20.0% | 20.4% | 16.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | 11.5% | 13.1% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.4% | 15.4% | 18.2% | 16.0% | 16.6% | 13.6% | 11.6% | 7.4% | 8.3% | 3.3% | 6.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.3% | 17.3% | 25.0% | 23.1% | 28.9% | 24.2% | 18.7% | 11.3% | 11.2% | 3.6% | 6.1% |
| ROA | 13.1% | 13.1% | 18.4% | 16.0% | 19.0% | 15.8% | 12.2% | 7.1% | 7.4% | 2.6% | 4.7% |
| ROIC | 15.4% | 15.4% | 20.9% | 18.1% | 20.9% | 17.0% | 11.6% | 7.9% | 9.3% | 9.2% | 8.3% |
| ROCE | 19.1% | 19.1% | 25.6% | 22.4% | 26.4% | 22.7% | 16.0% | 9.9% | 11.6% | 11.7% | 10.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.21 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 1.46 | 1.71 | 3.12 | 2.68 | 1.96 | 1.79 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 1.13 | 1.56 | 2.69 | 2.17 | 1.34 | 1.06 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.69 | 9.44 | 0.85 | 3.33 | — | 6.30 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.47 | 8.47 | 9.20 | 8.93 | 8.02 | 7.63 | 4.21 | 10.31 | 8.39 | 7.75 | 7.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 1.08 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.19 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.09 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.55 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.06 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 7.15 | 2.41 | 2.18 | 1.10 | 1.79 | 1.95 | 2.18 | 2.83 | 1.29 | 2.35 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | — | — | — | 2.9% | 1.9% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.0% | — | — | — | 20.8% | 72.8% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.7% | 11.3% | 15.0% | 11.8% | 24.8% | 12.3% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 14.1% | 2.7% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 7.6% | 0.9% | 8.6% | 7.6% | — | 2.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.0% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 8.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.1% | 3.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 9.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 3.2% | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $44M | $45M | $46M | $48M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $50M | $49M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GRBK stock.
Green Brick Partners, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 10.3x. The historical average is 11.9x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.
Green Brick Partners, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.0x.
Green Brick Partners, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.3%. The historical average is -1.7%.
Based on historical data, Green Brick Partners, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 10.3x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Green Brick Partners, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.10% with a payout ratio of 0.9%.
Green Brick Partners, Inc. has 31.2% gross margin and 20.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Green Brick Partners, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Legacy land margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Multiples Reflect Earnings Pressure
Based on the supplied multiples, GRBK trades at a trailing P/E of 9.17 and EV/EBITDA of 7.07, both below Meritage at 10.63 and 10.05 and LGI Homes at 14.61 and 31.56, suggesting the market is pricing in continued earnings deterioration.
The forward P/E of 11.25 sits above the trailing figure, which implies consensus expects earnings to contract further rather than recover, consistent with the recent EPS miss to $1.35. A PEG of 0.35 looks optically cheap, but it rests on growth estimates that the falling revenue trend may not support, so the multiple should be read as a value signal conditional on margin stabilization. The 1.37 price-to-sales ratio is modest for a builder posting 28.6% gross margins, indicating investors are discounting durability of those margins.
Margin Compression Erodes Premium Earning Power
As reported in financial statements, GRBK's gross margin fell from 34.2% in 2024Q4 to 28.6% in 2026Q3, while net margin declined from 18.3% to 13.2%, a compression that narrows the gap with peers but remains well above MTH's 7.7% net margin.
The decline in operating margin from 23.5% to 17.0% over the same window indicates negative operating leverage, with overhead and selling costs not flexing down as fast as gross profit eroded. The most reliable earning-power measure here is operating margin before land-basis effects, since net margin is also shaped by interest and tax items that are minor for this low-leverage balance sheet. Investors should monitor whether the remaining legacy lots can sustain gross margin above 30%, as the current trajectory suggests convergence toward industry norms.
Returns Decay as Equity Base Expands
Based on the quarterly ratio series, ROE fell from 7.4% in 2024Q2 to 2.9% in 2026Q3 and ROIC from 6.2% to 2.5%, a decay that reflects both lower profits and a growing capital base rather than a single-period anomaly.
The compounding of retained earnings into a larger balance sheet, with total assets rising toward $2.7B while quarterly profitability softened, explains much of the ROIC erosion. This pattern suggests capital is being deployed into land and inventory at returns below the historical run-rate, which may indicate the company is struggling to redeploy cash productively. Against peers, GRBK's 2.5% ROIC trails SKY at 17.6% and TMHC at 11.0%, so the lead it once held on capital efficiency has largely disappeared.
Minimal Debt Sustains Coverage Comfort
According to the reported figures, GRBK's debt-to-equity ratio held between 0.14 and 0.22 across ten quarters, with debt-to-EBITDA at 4.46 in 2026Q3, a level that appears elevated on a trailing basis but reflects a shrinking EBITDA denominator rather than rising borrowings.
The rise in debt-to-EBITDA from roughly 2.4 to 4.5 over the period is mechanically driven by falling earnings, not by aggressive new borrowing, which is a distinction worth preserving in analysis. Interest coverage is not reported as a meaningful figure for this business, so refinancing risk cannot be assessed from the supplied data and should be treated as unavailable. The overall leverage profile remains structurally conservative, providing a buffer against the cyclical downturn that management has described.
Liquidity Strong but Cash Buffer Thinning
As reported in financial statements, GRBK's current ratio of 9.38 in 2026Q3 and quick ratio of 0.74 indicate ample short-term coverage, yet cash fell to $100.0M from $191.0M in 2025Q4 alongside negative operating cash flow.
The current ratio is heavily inflated by inventory and land, so the quick ratio of 0.74 better reflects the liquidity available if sales slow further and lots cannot be monetized quickly. Days inventory outstanding of roughly 637 indicates how much of the balance sheet is tied up in land and work in progress, which under a stress scenario would depreciate in realizable value. The thinning cash position warrants monitoring, though the low debt load suggests the company retains meaningful capacity to fund operations.
Working Capital Absorbs Operating Cash
Based on reported figures, GRBK's cash conversion cycle expanded from 408 days in 2024Q2 to 615 days in 2026Q3, driven primarily by a rise in days inventory outstanding to roughly 637, indicating land and inventory are consuming cash faster than it is recovered.
The lengthening cycle reflects a deliberate or forced build in inventory relative to deliveries, which is consistent with the working capital drains that turned operating cash flow negative in 2026Q3. Days payables outstanding of about 29 is minimal, meaning the company is not financing its operations through supplier credit, so the cycle must be funded from equity and debt. Investors should monitor whether inventory turns improve as the company converts land into homes, since a continued extension would suggest demand absorption is slowing.
Misapplied Metric: Current Ratio Overstates Strength
The current ratio of 9.38 is the metric most often misapplied to GRBK, as it is inflated by land and inventory that may convert to cash slowly, obscuring the thinner quick ratio of 0.74.
For a land-heavy homebuilder, current assets are dominated by inventory whose liquidity depends on sales velocity and local absorption, so the headline current ratio can give false comfort during a demand slowdown. A more appropriate measure is the quick ratio combined with cash-to-debt and operating cash flow conversion, which in 2026Q3 was negative at roughly -0.89 of net income. The bear reading that cash conversion is weakening may be overstated if inventory is positioned deliberately, but this cannot be confirmed from the supplied ten quarters.