Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -41.4%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $85M | $80M | $278M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $48M | $43M | $260M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.42 | 0.37 | 2.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -41.4% | -41.4% | -30.4% | -7.6% | -19.3% | -3.1% | -9.8% | -15.0% | -8.4% |
| ROA | -39.1% | -39.1% | -29.3% | -7.4% | -18.9% | -3.0% | -9.3% | -14.4% | -8.0% |
| ROIC | -38.8% | -38.8% | -24.6% | -6.1% | -16.2% | -2.2% | -7.1% | -11.4% | -6.3% |
| ROCE | -41.9% | -41.9% | -30.0% | -7.6% | -19.1% | -2.7% | -9.2% | -14.7% | -8.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.17 | -0.13 | -0.02 | -0.09 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.01 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -54.42 | -54.42 | — | — | — | -10.92 | -52.19 | -126.07 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($38M) exceeds total debt ($759599)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 10.78 | 10.78 | 6.79 | 1.64 | 10.45 | 8.90 | 0.28 | 0.80 | 1.65 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.78 | 10.78 | 6.79 | 1.64 | 10.45 | 8.90 | 0.28 | 0.80 | 1.65 |
| Cash Ratio | 10.20 | 10.20 | 6.11 | 1.42 | 10.22 | 7.55 | 0.22 | 0.71 | 1.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $36M | $38M | $38M | $36M | $36M | $36M | $36M |
Regulatory and Permitting Delays
Based on reported financial statements, Brazil Potash Corp. trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.42, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the carrying value of its exploration assets relative to the significant execution risks inherent in the Autazes Project's development timeline.
The current P/B multiple reflects a deep discount compared to established global potash producers, indicating that investors are pricing in the high probability of further equity dilution or potential asset impairment. Given the absence of revenue, traditional earnings-based valuation metrics are inapplicable, leaving the market to rely on speculative net asset value assessments that remain highly sensitive to permitting outcomes.
As indicated by the company's quarterly data, ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -2.4% in 2026Q1, which underscores the reality that capital is currently being consumed to fund regulatory and administrative hurdles rather than generating any productive return on invested capital.
The persistent decay in return metrics is a structural feature of a pre-revenue mining entity where capital is deployed into long-term exploration assets that have yet to reach commercial viability. Investors should monitor whether future capital expenditures can eventually transition these negative returns into positive territory, though this remains contingent on the successful commencement of mining operations.
According to recent filings, the company's current ratio has fluctuated wildly from 0.32 in 2024Q3 to 13.28 in 2026Q1, illustrating that liquidity is entirely dependent on the timing of external financing rounds rather than any internal cash generation or operational stability.
While the current ratio appears robust in the most recent quarter, this metric is misleading as it does not account for the massive, non-discretionary capital expenditures required to bring the Autazes Project to production. The reliance on episodic cash injections suggests a vulnerable liquidity profile that could be severely tested if regulatory delays extend the pre-revenue phase beyond current projections.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Brazil Potash Corp. is the price-to-earnings ratio, which, as shown by the TTM figure of -1.23, obscures the company's true financial health by focusing on accounting losses rather than the critical burn rate and permitting milestones.
Investors should instead prioritize monitoring the cash burn rate and the progress of the Installation License, as these factors are the primary determinants of the company's survival. Relying on earnings-based multiples in a pre-revenue context is fundamentally flawed and may lead to a significant misinterpretation of the company's risk-adjusted value proposition.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GRO stock.
Brazil Potash Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -1.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Brazil Potash Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -41.4%. The historical average is -16.9%.
Based on historical data, Brazil Potash Corp. is trading at a P/E of -1.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.