Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.5x · EV/EBITDA 12.3x · ROE 3.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15M | $17M | $32M | $35M | $27M | $66M | $18M | $20M | $58M | $33M | $41M |
| Enterprise Value | $54M | $57M | $73M | $80M | $69M | $112M | $82M | $30M | $62M | $34M | $35M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.52 | 17.03 | 20.71 | 3.18 | — | 3.93 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.64 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.98 | 1.07 | 0.98 | 2.14 | 1.19 | 0.70 | 1.56 | 0.89 | 1.09 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 16.26 | 11.07 | 10.25 | 11.11 | 3.10 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.10 | 10.82 | 6.30 | 4.44 | 5.14 | 7.22 | 2.14 | 2.98 | 8.91 | 6.68 | 7.66 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.31 | 12.94 | 13.94 | 16.98 | 21.78 | 7.77 | — | 27.64 | 14.33 | 20.42 | 17.22 |
| EV / EBIT | 163.35 | 120.58 | 52.83 | 83.13 | — | 5.99 | — | — | 165.25 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 36.67 | 25.06 | 26.13 | 18.81 | 14.20 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 9.6% | 11.1% | 11.2% | 11.5% | 14.8% | 11.2% | 9.7% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 11.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.7% | -0.6% | 5.6% | -11.0% | -3.2% | 0.4% | -1.8% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 8.0% | -1.9% | 13.5% | -12.7% | -4.6% | -1.0% | -2.9% | -2.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.1% | 3.1% | 4.9% | 36.5% | -9.0% | 73.2% | -63.4% | -15.5% | -2.8% | -6.0% | -3.5% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 12.5% | -2.9% | 17.4% | -17.4% | -8.5% | -1.8% | -4.4% | -2.8% |
| ROIC | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.4% | 1.0% | -0.9% | 6.6% | -15.3% | -6.5% | 0.7% | -3.1% | -0.8% |
| ROCE | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.9% | 1.3% | -1.1% | 8.5% | -18.3% | -6.8% | 0.7% | -3.2% | -0.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.34 | 1.48 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 5.04 | 0.44 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.55 | 9.55 | 8.50 | 10.36 | 16.03 | 3.79 | — | 11.74 | 1.73 | 3.19 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.35 | 1.51 | 1.48 | 4.28 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.03 | -0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.96 | 8.96 | 7.76 | 9.48 | 13.23 | 3.18 | — | 9.23 | 0.93 | 0.61 | -3.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 20.41 | 13.99 | 15.87 | 7.70 | 11.11 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.40 | 2.40 | 11.04 | 12.35 | -16.26 | 69.42 | -15.95 | -4.62 | 0.96 | -7.40 | -2.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 1.52 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 1.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.63 | 1.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.69 | 1.63 | 1.52 | 1.60 | 1.32 | 1.10 | 1.85 | 1.63 | 1.43 | 1.37 |
| Inventory Turnover | 92.28 | 92.28 | 89.16 | 87.24 | 88.13 | 81.02 | 89.26 | 88.71 | 88.63 | 84.55 | 90.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.05 | 2.28 | 2.03 | 1.83 | 1.90 | 2.22 | 2.71 | 6.41 | 2.70 | 2.74 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.9% | 5.9% | 4.8% | 31.4% | — | 25.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 6.1% | 9.0% | 9.8% | 9.0% | 32.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.7% | 2.2% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.7% | 2.2% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $11M | $12M | $12M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $12M | $12M | $12M |
Thin liquidity and leverage
According to current market data, GTIM trades at a P/S ratio of 0.10 and an EV/EBITDA of 12.31, suggesting that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented restaurant operator compared to its casual dining peers like BJRI or RRGB.
The low P/S multiple indicates that the market assigns minimal value to the company's revenue stream, likely due to the lack of consistent profitability and stagnant top-line growth. The EV/EBITDA multiple, while appearing moderate, is misleading given the company's inability to generate meaningful operating leverage, suggesting that the market is not yet pricing in a turnaround scenario.
Based on reported financial statements, GTIM's ROIC has struggled to remain positive, fluctuating between -0.5% and 1.2% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company is failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital across its dual-format restaurant portfolio.
The persistent inability to achieve a sustainable ROIC suggests that the capital invested in Bad Daddy’s expansion has not yielded the expected operational efficiencies. Investors should monitor whether management can improve asset utilization, as current returns appear insufficient to justify the ongoing capital intensity required to maintain the store base.
As evidenced by the company's quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has remained consistently negative, yet this appears to be a function of limited inventory management rather than structural supplier leverage, as the company struggles to optimize its cash flow amidst tight operational margins.
The asset turnover ratio, hovering around 0.40, highlights the capital-heavy nature of the business model and the difficulty of generating revenue from the existing store footprint. This low turnover, combined with thin margins, suggests that the company lacks the operational scale necessary to improve its working capital position relative to larger industry competitors.
According to recent SEC filings, GTIM's current ratio has consistently languished below 0.50, reaching 0.40 in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company maintains a very narrow margin of safety to cover its immediate short-term obligations without relying on external financing or operational cash flow improvements.
The reliance on a quick ratio of 0.31 suggests that the company is highly dependent on inventory turnover to meet its liabilities, leaving it vulnerable to any sudden disruption in guest traffic. This liquidity profile warrants close monitoring, as the company lacks the financial flexibility to absorb significant operational shocks or unexpected capital expenditures.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to GTIM, as the company's near-breakeven net income makes the metric highly volatile and unrepresentative of the underlying business value, which is better assessed through a sum-of-the-parts analysis of the QSR and casual dining segments.
Using P/E for a company with such thin margins ignores the significant impact of non-cash charges and commodity price volatility on the bottom line. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or free cash flow yield to better understand the company's ability to generate cash from its core restaurant operations.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GTIM stock.
Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.5x. The historical average is 27.1x. This places it at the 29th percentile of its historical range.
Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.0x.
Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.1%. The historical average is -10.8%.
Based on historical data, Good Times Restaurants Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.5x. This is at the 29th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Good Times Restaurants Inc. has 9.6% gross margin and 0.2% operating margin.
Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.