Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 2.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $48M | $482M | $228M |
| Enterprise Value | $47M | $480M | $228M |
| P/E Ratio → | 2.12 | — | 100.00 |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — |
| ROA | -3469.8% | -3469.8% | 5106.0% |
| ROIC | — | — | — |
| ROCE | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($2M) exceeds total debt ($50230)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 47.2% | — | 1.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $46M | $23M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HDRN stock.
Hadron Energy, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 2.1x. The historical average is 100.0x.
Based on historical data, Hadron Energy, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 2.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Operational Revenue Classification Ambiguity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Disconnects From Operating Reality
According to recent financial data, GIG trades at a P/S multiple of 191.19, a figure that appears highly anomalous for a firm classified as a shell company, suggesting that the market may be mispricing the entity by failing to reconcile its reported $127.67 million in revenue.
The extreme P/S ratio implies that investors are either pricing in massive future growth or are confused by the company's transition from a SPAC to an operating entity. This valuation warrants further investigation, as the current multiple is disconnected from the underlying negative operating margins and the inherent risks of the post-merger integration phase.
Operational Margins Masked By Non-Operating Gains
Based on reported figures, GIG's net margin of 3.00% appears to be supported by non-operating income, as the core business continues to struggle with a negative operating margin of -2.62%, indicating that the firm has yet to achieve sustainable profitability in its current operational configuration.
The reliance on non-operating items to achieve a positive net margin suggests that the company's core business model is not yet self-sustaining. Investors should monitor whether the 22.31% gross margin can be expanded through operational efficiencies, or if the current cost structure will continue to weigh on the bottom line.
Capital Efficiency Remains Severely Depressed
As reported in financial statements, GIG's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -0.2% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is currently destroying value rather than compounding it through its recent capital deployments and acquisition activities within the TMT sector.
The persistent negative return on invested capital highlights the difficulty of integrating acquired assets into the GigGUI framework. This trend suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy has not yet yielded the expected operational synergies, necessitating a closer look at the quality of the assets currently held on the balance sheet.
Liquidity Buffer Faces Structural Uncertainty
According to the 2026Q1 balance sheet, GIG maintains a current ratio of 6.08, yet this liquidity position appears potentially misleading given the company's history of significant cash outflows and the ongoing operational burn observed in recent quarters, as indicated by the firm's own financial disclosures.
While the current ratio suggests a comfortable cushion, the absolute cash position may be restricted or earmarked for specific liabilities, limiting its utility for general corporate purposes. The company's liquidity position appears vulnerable to further operational losses, which could rapidly erode the cash buffer if the current burn rate persists.
Misapplication of Shell Company Metrics
Based on the reported figures, the most commonly misapplied ratio for GIG is the P/B ratio of 30.26, which is largely irrelevant for a company that has transitioned into an operating entity with significant goodwill and intangible assets rather than tangible book value.
Using book value to assess a company that is essentially a vehicle for intangible asset integration obscures the true economic value of the firm's intellectual property and management framework. Analysts should instead focus on EV/Revenue or cash-flow-based metrics to better capture the potential of the GigGUI operating model.