Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -584.9%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12M | $7M | $9M | $6M | $11M | $72M | $43M | $22M | $9M | $8M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7M | $2M | $9M | $2M | $8M | $49M | $53M | $24M | $10M | $-1674603 | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 38.57 | 23.26 | 1.15 | 0.69 | 1.02 | 5.28 | 3.81 | 1.46 | 14.83 | 6.22 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.26 | 1.98 | — | 0.89 | 3.13 | 1.62 | 2.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5707105.35 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.77 | 1.18 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 3.63 | 4.71 | 1.62 | 16.09 | -1.30 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 64.7% | 64.7% | 63.2% | 63.9% | 60.5% | 61.4% | 55.4% | 61.7% | 72.9% | 27.3% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -859.2% | -859.2% | -96.5% | -168.7% | -240.9% | -425.6% | -110.2% | -162.1% | -6353.3% | -2440.1% | -2897.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3209.7% | -3209.7% | -89.1% | -131.2% | -411.2% | -464.3% | -191.4% | -491.8% | -13375.7% | -2627.3% | -2969.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -584.9% | -584.9% | -222.5% | -220.6% | -192.6% | -214.7% | -112.1% | -266.1% | -150.2% | -85.3% | -706.6% |
| ROA | -181.8% | -181.8% | -91.9% | -103.6% | -144.9% | -136.9% | -54.5% | -172.7% | -120.2% | -70.6% | -250.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | -485.6% | -979.0% | -187.0% | -186.4% | -36.4% | -62.2% | -58.3% | -70.9% | — |
| ROCE | -153.9% | -153.9% | -228.7% | -272.8% | -111.0% | -158.3% | -43.4% | -72.8% | -61.4% | -67.3% | -355.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.32 | — | -0.64 | -1.03 | -0.51 | 0.71 | 0.10 | 0.02 | -0.13 | -1.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -18.73 | -18.73 | — | — | -411.34 | -75.23 | -9.64 | -165.52 | -3096.17 | -8460.54 | -4.87 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($31258)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.99 | 1.99 | 0.92 | 2.73 | 1.32 | 3.98 | 0.77 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 12.81 | 4.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.99 | 1.99 | 0.43 | 1.74 | 0.84 | 3.58 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 10.22 | 3.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.82 | 1.82 | 0.14 | 1.21 | 0.53 | 3.02 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 30.75 | 4.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 1.67 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 1.20 | 0.84 | 1.23 | 1.75 | 2.24 | 4.39 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 112.58 | 46.87 | 69.78 | 70.79 | 75.55 | 84.64 | 99.08 | 551.67 | 138.56 | 66.67 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $20622 | $4107 | $293 | $151 | $43 | $22 | $9 | $8 | $0 |
Imminent liquidity exhaustion
According to recent market data, HIND trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 38.92, a figure that appears disconnected from its near-zero revenue base and suggests investors are pricing the equity as a speculative option on intellectual property rather than a functioning commercial enterprise.
The elevated P/S ratio is likely an artifact of the company's revenue collapse rather than a signal of premium growth expectations. Given the lack of forward earnings and the absence of a clear path to commercialization, this valuation multiple provides little utility for fundamental assessment and may mask the underlying risk of total equity dilution.
As reported in financial statements, HIND maintains a gross margin of 64.68%, yet this figure is fundamentally misleading because the company's operating margin of -859.22% highlights a cost structure that is entirely detached from its current, minimal revenue-generating capacity.
The high gross margin reflects the absence of significant cost of goods sold, which is typical for a pre-revenue biotech firm, but it fails to account for the massive R&D and administrative overhead required to sustain operations. Investors should monitor whether the company can transition to a royalty-based model, as the current operating losses suggest the existing cost structure is unsustainable.
Based on reported figures, HIND's asset turnover ratio has remained near zero, reflecting a lack of productive asset utilization that is consistent with a company that has yet to successfully commercialize its molecularly defined pharmaceutical platform.
The extreme volatility in days sales outstanding and days payable outstanding suggests significant friction in the company's cash conversion cycle. This inefficiency indicates that management is struggling to manage vendor relationships and revenue collection, which further complicates the company's already precarious liquidity position.
As indicated by the most recent quarterly data, HIND's current ratio of 4.27 appears deceptively healthy, yet this metric masks the reality that the company's cash reserves are rapidly depleting against a backdrop of persistent, high-burn clinical development activities.
While the current ratio suggests an ability to cover short-term obligations, the lack of recurring revenue means that the company is entirely dependent on external financing to maintain its operations. The rapid erosion of cash over the last ten quarters warrants close monitoring, as the current runway appears insufficient to support long-term clinical milestones.
The price-to-book ratio of 1.27 is frequently misapplied to HIND, as it obscures the fact that the company's book value is heavily influenced by intangible assets and goodwill that may hold little liquidation value in a distressed scenario.
Investors should instead focus on the cash-to-burn ratio, as the book value does not accurately reflect the company's ability to survive as a going concern. Relying on P/B in this context may lead to an overestimation of the company's floor value, ignoring the reality that the primary asset is a clinical-stage pipeline with significant binary risk.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HIND stock.
Vyome Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Vyome Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -584.9%. The historical average is -191.6%.
Based on historical data, Vyome Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Vyome Holdings, Inc. has 64.7% gross margin and -859.2% operating margin.