Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -120.3x · EV/EBITDA 4.6x · ROE -0.6%. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | $11M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6M | $13M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -120.33 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.20 | 0.54 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.74 | 2.21 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 9.59 | 26.61 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 6.98 | 19.36 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.62 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.64 | 10.49 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 42.39 | 94.54 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.53 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 11.9% | 21.3% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 0.7% | 9.6% | 8.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.1% | -0.1% | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.6% | -0.6% | 55.0% | 170.6% |
| ROA | -0.3% | -0.3% | 22.0% | 29.3% |
| ROIC | 1.6% | 1.6% | 37.3% | 104.1% |
| ROCE | 2.2% | 2.2% | 50.7% | 121.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.97 | 1.97 | 0.82 | 0.39 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.58 | 0.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.93 | — | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.35 | 1.35 | 19.43 | 44.91 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.99 | 2.99 | 2.46 | 1.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.80 | 2.80 | 2.16 | 1.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.16 | 1.93 | 3.69 |
| Inventory Turnover | 31.96 | 31.96 | 14.07 | 51.43 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 84.69 | 81.33 | 49.35 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.4% | 3.8% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $7M | $11M |
Liquidity and Regulatory Volatility
As reported in recent financial statements, HKPD trades at a P/S ratio of 0.20, which, when coupled with a negative TTM P/E of -120.33, suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's future growth prospects due to its inability to achieve consistent bottom-line profitability.
The current valuation multiples appear to reflect a market that has lost confidence in the company's ability to scale its pharmaceutical distribution model profitably. Investors should monitor whether the low P/S ratio represents a genuine value opportunity or a structural trap given the ongoing erosion of margins and the lack of a clear path to positive earnings.
Based on HKPD's reported figures, the ROIC has plummeted from 17.0% in 2024Q4 to -9.6% in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it as it struggles to manage its high-cost infrastructure in the competitive Hong Kong pharmaceutical logistics market.
The sharp decline in ROIC suggests that the capital invested in warehousing and regulatory compliance is failing to generate adequate returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's asset-heavy business model is fundamentally flawed or if the current negative returns are merely a temporary byproduct of aggressive, yet inefficient, market expansion.
According to recent financial filings, HKPD's cash conversion cycle has extended to 138 days in 2025Q4, driven by a significant increase in DSO to 187 days, which highlights a growing inability to collect payments from customers in a timely manner despite the company's high-volume wholesale operations.
The lengthening of the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company is effectively financing its customers' operations, which is unsustainable given its own tight liquidity position. This inefficiency appears to be a primary driver of the company's cash burn and indicates that management lacks sufficient leverage over its client base to enforce shorter payment terms.
As reported in recent financial statements, HKPD's current ratio of 2.99 masks a precarious liquidity position, as the company's cash reserves of $748.7K are insufficient to cover its ongoing operational losses and the high fixed costs associated with its specialized pharmaceutical-compliant warehousing in the Hong Kong market.
While the current ratio appears healthy on the surface, the reliance on inventory and receivables to meet short-term obligations poses a significant risk if those assets cannot be liquidated quickly. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional financing, as the current cash burn rate suggests that the existing liquidity buffer may be exhausted in the near term.
Financial statements reveal that the market's focus on top-line revenue growth is a misapplied metric for HKPD, as it obscures the underlying cash-based operational losses and the high-risk nature of the company's principal-based accounting model in the volatile cross-border pharmaceutical logistics sector.
Analysts should prioritize cash flow from operations and the cash conversion cycle over revenue growth, as the latter can be easily inflated by low-margin wholesale transactions that do not contribute to long-term value. Relying on revenue as a primary indicator of success in this business model likely leads to an overestimation of the company's competitive positioning and financial health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HKPD stock.
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited's current P/E ratio is -120.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 4.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.5x.
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -0.6%. The historical average is 75.0%.
Based on historical data, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited is trading at a P/E of -120.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited has 11.9% gross margin and 0.7% operating margin.
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.