Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -28.8x · EV/EBITDA 43.1x · ROE -10.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.2B | $717M | $699M | $404M | $340M | $389M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $803M | $792M | $473M | $415M | $457M |
| P/E Ratio → | -28.80 | — | 40.09 | 18.11 | 52.40 | 98.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.29 | 3.13 | 2.29 | 2.52 | 2.36 | 2.46 | 1.89 | 1.73 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.26 | 2.95 | 3.34 | 3.50 | 4.54 | 4.21 | 2.77 | 2.77 | 1.77 | 1.56 | 1.44 |
| P/FCF | 12.26 | 11.66 | 29.48 | — | — | 44.53 | 102.99 | 33.32 | 77.12 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 11.00 | 10.46 | 25.10 | 216.80 | 268.84 | 30.44 | 18.30 | 22.33 | 32.90 | 111.00 | 887.04 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.20 | 2.36 | 2.64 | 2.47 | 2.57 | 2.12 | 1.97 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 43.08 | 41.01 | 21.27 | 46.54 | 26.71 | 40.97 | 246.40 | 24.23 | 28.96 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 71.12 | 91.07 | 24.54 | 73.37 | 31.25 | 66.95 | — | 156.66 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.90 | 30.36 | — | — | 46.55 | 115.37 | 37.77 | 90.23 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 45.4% | 53.9% | 51.4% | 50.5% | 51.2% | 51.5% | 55.4% | 51.8% | 47.4% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 4.7% | 9.3% | 3.6% | 7.3% | 3.7% | -3.3% | 3.2% | -1.2% | -19.8% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -12.0% | -12.0% | 5.8% | 13.8% | 4.5% | 2.6% | -7.7% | -1.5% | -5.2% | -23.2% | -17.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.2% | -10.2% | 8.7% | 22.1% | 9.1% | 4.8% | -11.5% | -2.5% | -9.4% | -33.9% | -24.2% |
| ROA | -5.7% | -5.7% | 5.0% | 11.4% | 4.0% | 2.1% | -5.0% | -1.1% | -4.1% | -15.6% | -13.4% |
| ROIC | 2.8% | 2.8% | 9.3% | 3.7% | 9.1% | 4.0% | -2.7% | 3.1% | -1.3% | -16.8% | -15.7% |
| ROCE | 3.0% | 3.0% | 11.2% | 5.0% | 10.6% | 4.1% | -3.0% | 3.4% | -1.4% | -18.3% | -15.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.26 | 5.26 | 1.97 | 4.53 | 2.78 | 5.97 | 56.72 | 5.70 | 8.25 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 2.09 | 1.23 | 1.78 | 26.44 | 2.85 | 4.21 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.25 | 0.89 | — | — | 2.02 | 12.38 | 4.45 | 13.11 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 3.33 | 3.33 | 8.91 | 8.10 | 9.80 | 1.83 | -1.28 | 0.43 | -0.49 | -6.65 | -6.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.18 | 1.21 | 1.07 | 1.44 | 1.62 | 1.31 | 1.44 | 1.21 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.26 | 2.26 | 1.80 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 1.12 | 1.38 | 1.16 | 1.25 | 1.03 | 1.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.11 | 4.11 | 4.89 | 3.52 | 2.56 | 3.48 | 5.25 | 6.19 | 7.58 | 7.25 | 4.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.99 | 98.04 | 87.84 | 66.59 | 69.55 | 73.25 | 92.84 | 84.05 | 71.16 | 78.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.5% | 5.5% | 1.9% | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.2% | 8.6% | 3.4% | — | — | 2.2% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 1.3% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 6.7% | 7.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.7% | 7.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $114M | $117M | $117M | $112M | $106M | $97M | $90M | $86M | $81M | $78M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HLIT stock.
Harmonic Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -28.8x. The historical average is 49.4x.
Harmonic Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 43.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 35.6x.
Harmonic Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -10.2%. The historical average is -7.7%.
Based on historical data, Harmonic Inc. is trading at a P/E of -28.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Harmonic Inc. has 45.4% gross margin and 4.7% operating margin.
Harmonic Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue volatility and margin recovery
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Amidst Revenue Air Pocket
Gross margin expanded to 52.4% in 2026Q2 from 51.5% a year earlier, while operating margin swung to 17.7% from -11.3% in 2024Q2, indicating a favorable mix shift and cost discipline.
The gross margin improvement despite a 46.9% TTM revenue decline suggests a favorable shift toward software and services within Cable Access, as hardware sales likely contracted more sharply. Operating margin recovery to 17.7% in 2026Q2 from -11.3% in 2024Q2 reflects a 20% reduction in combined R&D and SG&A expenses, but net margin remains negative at -1.7%, indicating that non-operating items and stock-based compensation still weigh on GAAP profitability. The persistence of negative net margins despite strong gross margins suggests that the cost structure, particularly SBC, remains a drag on reported earnings.
ROIC Inflection Signals Cyclical Turn
ROIC improved to 5.6% in 2026Q2 from -2.4% in 2024Q2, but remains below the 7.7% peak in 2024Q4, indicating a partial recovery from the trough.
The sharp swing in ROIC from -2.4% in 2024Q2 to 5.6% in 2026Q2 reflects both margin recovery and a reduced capital base, as total assets fell from $796.5M to $632.6M. However, ROIC remains below the 7.7% level achieved in 2024Q4, suggesting that the recovery is still incomplete relative to the prior peak. The improvement is driven primarily by operating margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained low at 0.20, indicating that the business is still operating below its capacity utilization.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Contract Timing
Cash conversion cycle improved to 91 days in 2026Q2 from 160 days in 2024Q1, driven by a reduction in DSO and DIO, but remains elevated due to lumpy deployments.
The CCC compression from 160 days to 91 days over the period reflects a 34-day reduction in DSO and a 45-day reduction in DIO, indicating improved collections and inventory management. However, the absolute level of 91 days remains high, suggesting that the business still carries significant working capital tied to large-scale deployments. The volatility in CCC, ranging from 91 to 160 days, underscores the project-based nature of revenue and the timing of milestone payments, which investors should monitor for sustainability.
Conservative Leverage Masks Refinancing Risk
Debt-to-equity remains low at 0.36, but D/EBITDA spiked to 23.23 in 2025Q4 from 2.66 in 2024Q4, reflecting the trough in EBITDA, though interest coverage improved to 21.3x in 2026Q2.
The D/E ratio of 0.36 indicates a conservative balance sheet, but the D/EBITDA spike to 23.23 in 2025Q4 highlights the earnings collapse during the trough, which temporarily inflated leverage metrics. Interest coverage improved to 21.3x in 2026Q2 from 3.38x in 2025Q2, suggesting that debt service is comfortable on a trailing basis, but the volatility in EBITDA warrants monitoring. The low absolute debt level of $130.1M provides a cushion, but the company's ability to refinance at favorable terms depends on sustaining the recovery in EBITDA.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Sharply
Current ratio improved to 3.05 in 2026Q2 from 1.09 in 2024Q1, with cash surging to $231.9M, providing a robust buffer against the lumpy deployment cycle.
The current ratio of 3.05 and quick ratio of 2.56 indicate a strong liquidity position, with cash and short-term investments covering a significant portion of current liabilities. This buffer is critical given the revenue volatility, as it allows the company to weather demand air pockets without financial distress. However, the improvement in liquidity is partly funded by equity erosion, as cumulative net losses and $153M in buybacks reduced equity by 22.6% since 2024Q4, suggesting a trade-off between balance sheet strength and shareholder value.
Misapplied Software Multiple Obscures Cyclicality
The market may misprice HLIT as a high-growth software company, but its P/S of 3.75 and forward P/E of 19.28 reflect a cyclical infrastructure provider tied to cable upgrade cycles.
The most commonly misapplied ratio is the P/S multiple, which at 3.75 appears reasonable for a software company but fails to account for the lumpy, project-based revenue profile and the significant hardware component in Cable Access. The forward P/E of 19.28 implies a recovery to normalized earnings, but the TTM P/E is negative, and the recent EPS beat may be non-recurring. Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA, which at 48.97 TTM and 34.92 forward, better captures the cyclicality and the impact of EBITDA volatility on valuation. The low asset turnover and high working capital intensity suggest that a software-like multiple overstates the business's capital efficiency.