Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -29.8x · EV/EBITDA 12.4x · ROE -10.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.2B | $717M | $699M | $404M | $340M | $389M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $803M | $792M | $473M | $415M | $457M |
| P/E Ratio → | -29.79 | — | 40.09 | 18.11 | 52.40 | 98.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.05 | 3.13 | 2.29 | 2.52 | 2.36 | 2.46 | 1.89 | 1.73 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.83 | 2.95 | 3.34 | 3.50 | 4.54 | 4.21 | 2.77 | 2.77 | 1.77 | 1.56 | 1.44 |
| P/FCF | 37.21 | 11.66 | 29.48 | — | — | 44.53 | 102.99 | 33.32 | 77.12 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.56 | 10.46 | 25.10 | 216.80 | 268.84 | 30.44 | 18.30 | 22.33 | 32.90 | 111.00 | 887.04 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.20 | 2.36 | 2.64 | 2.47 | 2.57 | 2.12 | 1.97 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.39 | 41.01 | 21.27 | 46.54 | 26.71 | 40.97 | 246.40 | 24.23 | 28.96 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 61.97 | 91.07 | 24.54 | 73.37 | 31.25 | 66.95 | — | 156.66 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.90 | 30.36 | — | — | 46.55 | 115.37 | 37.77 | 90.23 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 45.4% | 53.9% | 51.4% | 50.5% | 51.2% | 51.5% | 55.4% | 51.8% | 47.4% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 4.7% | 9.3% | 3.6% | 7.3% | 3.7% | -3.3% | 3.2% | -1.2% | -19.8% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -12.0% | -12.0% | 5.8% | 13.8% | 4.5% | 2.6% | -7.7% | -1.5% | -5.2% | -23.2% | -17.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.2% | -10.2% | 8.7% | 22.1% | 9.1% | 4.8% | -11.5% | -2.5% | -9.4% | -33.9% | -24.2% |
| ROA | -5.7% | -5.7% | 5.0% | 11.4% | 4.0% | 2.1% | -5.0% | -1.1% | -4.1% | -15.6% | -13.4% |
| ROIC | 2.8% | 2.8% | 9.3% | 3.7% | 9.1% | 4.0% | -2.7% | 3.1% | -1.3% | -16.8% | -15.7% |
| ROCE | 3.0% | 3.0% | 11.2% | 5.0% | 10.6% | 4.1% | -3.0% | 3.4% | -1.4% | -18.3% | -15.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.26 | 5.26 | 1.97 | 4.53 | 2.78 | 5.97 | 56.72 | 5.70 | 8.25 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 2.09 | 1.23 | 1.78 | 26.44 | 2.85 | 4.21 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.25 | 0.89 | — | — | 2.02 | 12.38 | 4.45 | 13.11 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 3.33 | 3.33 | 8.91 | 8.10 | 9.80 | 1.83 | -1.28 | 0.43 | -0.49 | -6.65 | -6.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.18 | 1.21 | 1.07 | 1.44 | 1.62 | 1.31 | 1.44 | 1.21 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.26 | 2.26 | 1.80 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 1.12 | 1.38 | 1.16 | 1.25 | 1.03 | 1.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.11 | 4.11 | 4.89 | 3.52 | 2.56 | 3.48 | 5.25 | 6.19 | 7.58 | 7.25 | 4.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.99 | 98.04 | 87.84 | 66.59 | 69.55 | 73.25 | 92.84 | 84.05 | 71.16 | 78.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.5% | 5.5% | 1.9% | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.7% | 8.6% | 3.4% | — | — | 2.2% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 1.3% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 7.7% | 7.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.7% | 7.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $114M | $117M | $117M | $112M | $106M | $97M | $90M | $86M | $81M | $78M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HLIT stock.
Harmonic Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -29.8x. The historical average is 49.4x.
Harmonic Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 35.6x.
Harmonic Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -10.2%. The historical average is -7.7%.
Based on historical data, Harmonic Inc. is trading at a P/E of -29.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Harmonic Inc. has 45.4% gross margin and 4.7% operating margin.
Harmonic Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Lumpy Cable Operator Demand
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Forward Earnings Discount Versus Trailing Losses
Based on reported figures, HLIT trades at 11.81 forward P/E and 6.91 forward EV/EBITDA against a negative trailing P/E of -29.79, a gap that suggests the market is pricing a recovery in earnings rather than current profitability.
The negative trailing P/E reflects the cumulative drag of the 2025Q4 loss, which makes trailing multiples unusable for judging value. The forward multiples compress sharply relative to trailing EV/EBITDA of 12.39, implying analysts expect earnings to roughly normalize as the recent demand rebound flows through. Investors should monitor whether the raised guidance range of $0.19-$0.23 EPS is sustained, since the valuation case depends on it rather than on historical earnings.
Operating Margin Recovers Faster Than Net Margin
As reported in financial statements, HLIT's operating margin climbed from 3.8% in 2025Q4 to 17.6% in 2026Q3 while trailing net margin remains at -12.0%, indicating earnings quality is lagging operating improvement.
Gross margin holding between 51.8% and 52.4% across the last three quarters points to stable pricing and product mix, so the operating recovery is driven by operating leverage on SG&A that has held near $22-27M. The persistent gap between a 9.8% quarterly net margin and the negative trailing figure suggests the cumulative impact of prior losses is still weighing on reported results. Operating margin is the better measure of current earning power, though below-the-line items warrant scrutiny before treating it as sustainable.
Returns Turning Positive From a Depressed Base
According to reported figures, HLIT's ROIC rose from 0.7% in 2025Q4 to 7.2% in 2026Q3, while ROE of 4.0% in the latest quarter remains well below the 8.5% peak seen in 2024Q4, suggesting returns are recovering but not yet at prior levels.
The ROIC improvement appears driven mainly by margin expansion rather than capital efficiency, since asset turnover has stayed in a narrow range near 0.17 to 0.24. Trailing ROE of -10.2% indicates the recovery has not yet reversed the earlier downturn on a cumulative basis. Investors should track whether ROIC can hold above the 5-6% range seen in the most recent quarters to confirm durable compounding.
Minimal Leverage With Improving Coverage
Based on reported figures, HLIT's debt-to-equity fell from 0.39 in 2025Q4 to 0.14 in 2026Q3 and interest coverage recovered to roughly 1.9x in the latest quarter, indicating debt service has become more comfortable.
Total debt reduction from $148.3M in 2024Q4 to $54.1M in 2026Q3 has materially lowered refinancing pressure, consistent with a conservative balance sheet. Debt-to-EBITDA has compressed from extreme levels in 2025 to 1.85x, which suggests earnings now support the remaining obligations more comfortably. The main caveat is that interest coverage was volatile through 2025, so the recent improvement should be confirmed over additional quarters before being treated as structural.
Strong Current Ratio Masks Cash Timing Volatility
As reported in financial statements, HLIT's current ratio stood at 2.43 and quick ratio at 1.82 in 2026Q3, but cash moved from $231.9M in 2026Q2 to $109.0M in 2026Q1, indicating liquidity depends heavily on timing of collections.
The quick ratio remaining above 1.8 suggests current liabilities are covered without relying on inventory, which is a meaningful strength for a hardware-weighted business. However, the large swings in cash balances and the DSO fluctuation between 60 and 96 days imply that receivable timing drives reported liquidity more than underlying structure. Under a severe stress scenario, the position would likely depend on whether collections from large operator contracts arrive on schedule.
Gross Margin Stability Versus Revenue Lumpiness
Based on reported figures, the most commonly misapplied metric here is trailing net margin, which at -12.0% obscures the 17.6% operating margin in 2026Q3 and may understate current earning power during the recovery.
Applying trailing net margin as a valuation or profitability anchor treats one-time deployment-timing losses as structural, which may be misleading given that gross margin has held near 52% through the trough. A more appropriate measure is operating margin on a normalized quarterly basis, adjusted for acceptance-driven revenue timing. Investors should also note that the free cash flow margin swings from -5.3% to 61.4% in the sample, so cash-based ratios are unreliable on a single-quarter basis.