Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 58.2x · EV/EBITDA 3.4x · ROE 1.2%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $955M | $594M | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.5B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $950M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.9B | $1.6B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $927M |
| P/E Ratio → | 58.15 | 36.46 | 21.94 | 9.01 | 11.85 | 27.11 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.11 | 0.69 | 1.78 | 1.58 | 3.36 | 6.30 | 59.65 | 117.04 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.59 | 0.37 | 1.19 | 1.13 | 2.17 | 2.51 | 3.10 | 2.10 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 27.44 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 1.87 | 1.16 | 2.75 | 2.32 | 5.04 | 9.44 | 1120.31 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.81 | 2.56 | 2.44 | 4.26 | 6.59 | 58.88 | 114.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.36 | 2.73 | 3.27 | 3.18 | 5.35 | 8.67 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 12.85 | 9.03 | 9.41 | 6.47 | 8.87 | 19.35 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 39.63 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.7% | 20.7% | 35.2% | 43.5% | 62.2% | 54.1% | -23.5% | 0.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.4% | 17.4% | 31.6% | 38.4% | 55.9% | 46.3% | -118.5% | -142.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.2% | 2.2% | 8.9% | 19.4% | 31.3% | 25.2% | -412.1% | -142.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.2% | 1.2% | 6.0% | 15.9% | 27.5% | 10.8% | -21.9% | -2.6% |
| ROA | 0.6% | 0.6% | 3.1% | 8.1% | 15.3% | 8.2% | -19.6% | -2.3% |
| ROIC | 4.5% | 4.5% | 10.2% | 14.7% | 25.8% | 14.3% | -4.9% | — |
| ROCE | 5.1% | 5.1% | 12.1% | 17.7% | 31.0% | 16.5% | -5.9% | -2.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.18 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.11 | 1.35 | 1.17 | 0.59 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.11 | -0.04 | -0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.01 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.38 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 12.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.73 | 2.83 | 7.17 | 30.17 | -3647.63 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.69 | 1.14 | 0.54 | 0.84 | 1.48 | 2.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.12 | 0.49 | 0.81 | 1.48 | 2.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.68 | 0.11 | 0.34 | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | 89.52 | 89.52 | 63.25 | 86.61 | 21.53 | 30.57 | 251.35 | 43.97 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 23.48 | 29.09 | 31.07 | 46.66 | 65.29 | 167.77 | 339.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.2% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 121.3% | 121.3% | 23.3% | 6.1% | 4.9% | 22.7% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.7% | 2.7% | 4.6% | 11.1% | 8.4% | 3.7% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 3.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $125M | $129M | $123M | $111M | $95M | $92M | $92M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HPK stock.
HighPeak Energy, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 58.2x. The historical average is 21.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
HighPeak Energy, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.6x.
HighPeak Energy, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 1.2%. The historical average is 5.3%.
Based on historical data, HighPeak Energy, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 58.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
HighPeak Energy, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.43% with a payout ratio of 121.3%.
HighPeak Energy, Inc. has 20.7% gross margin and 17.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
HighPeak Energy, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent net losses and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Core Erosion
Gross margin swung from 37.8% in 2025Q1 to -7.4% in 2025Q4, then recovered to 19.8% in 2026Q1, per quarterly filings, indicating unstable cost structures and pricing power.
The dramatic swings in gross margin, from 37.8% to -7.4% within a year, suggest that HPK's profitability is highly sensitive to commodity price realizations and potentially volatile production costs. The 2026Q1 operating margin of 16.7% appears healthy, but the net margin of -59.0% reveals that non-operating charges, likely including impairments or hedging losses, are overwhelming core extraction profitability. Investors should monitor whether the positive operating margin can be sustained without the offsetting non-cash charges that have plagued recent quarters.
Return on Capital Decays Amid Expansion
ROIC fell from 3.3% in 2023Q4 to 1.1% in 2026Q1, while ROE turned deeply negative at -8.3%, as reported in financial statements, indicating deteriorating capital efficiency.
The downward trend in ROIC from 3.3% to 1.1% over the past two years suggests that HPK's heavy capital expenditures are not generating commensurate returns, likely due to declining well productivity or rising service costs. The negative ROE of -8.3% in 2026Q1, driven by a net loss of $127.4M, underscores that shareholder equity is being eroded. This pattern implies that the company's growth strategy is currently destroying value, and investors should question whether the aggressive reinvestment in drilling is justified by the returns.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Strain
Cash conversion cycle turned negative to -2 days in 2025Q2 but swung to 0 days in 2026Q1, with DSO rising to 32 days, per quarterly data, indicating tighter working capital management.
The CCC has remained near zero or slightly negative, which is typical for E&P companies with minimal inventory, but the recent increase in DSO to 32 days suggests slower collections. The negative CCC in 2025Q2 was driven by a DPO of 40 days, indicating HPK was stretching payables, but that advantage has since narrowed. This may reflect a tightening of supplier terms or a deliberate effort to conserve cash, but it also signals potential strain in the supply chain relationship.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Coverage Falters
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.75 in 2026Q1, the highest in the series, while interest coverage turned negative at -3.43, per balance sheet data, indicating rising financial risk.
The increase in D/E from 0.66 in 2023Q4 to 0.75 in 2026Q1, coupled with a negative interest coverage ratio, suggests that HPK's earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses. The D/EBITDA ratio of 7.36 in 2026Q1 is elevated compared to the peer average, indicating that debt levels are high relative to cash flow. This trend warrants close monitoring, as continued net losses could further erode equity and push leverage to unsustainable levels.
Liquidity Tightens Below Critical Threshold
Current ratio fell to 0.67 in 2026Q1 from 1.13 in 2025Q4, with cash dropping to $95.8M, as per balance sheet data, signaling a strained liquidity position.
The current ratio dropping below 1.0 indicates that HPK's short-term liabilities exceed its short-term assets, which could force the company to rely on external financing or asset sales to meet obligations. The quick ratio of 0.66, which excludes inventory, confirms that the liquidity strain is not inventory-related but rather a cash and receivables shortfall. Given the negative FCF margin of -27.9% in 2026Q1, HPK may face challenges funding its capital program without additional debt or equity issuance.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on True Value
EV/EBITDA of 3.44 appears cheap, but with negative net income and volatile EBITDA, this multiple may understate risk, as reported in financial statements.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 3.44 is significantly lower than peers like Matador (4.16) and Ring Energy (4.09), which could suggest HPK is undervalued. However, this metric is distorted by the company's heavy non-cash charges and volatile EBITDA, which swung from positive to negative in recent quarters. A more appropriate valuation metric for HPK would be EV/EBITDAX (excluding exploration costs) or a NAV-based approach that accounts for the value of proved reserves. Investors should be cautious in relying on EV/EBITDA alone, as it may overstate the company's earnings power given the persistent net losses.