Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.9x · ROE 710.9%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.7B | $4.8B | $7.5B | $7.8B | $4.9B | $6.1B | $4.4B | $2.9B | $5.6B | $5.8B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $7.8B | $6.0B | $8.9B | $9.0B | $6.1B | $7.2B | $5.6B | $4.3B | $5.4B | $5.6B | $5.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.12 | 6.59 | 12.50 | 13.16 | 9.08 | 10.97 | 7.62 | — | 13.34 | 9.47 | 12.98 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.69 | 1.23 | 2.00 | 2.16 | 1.42 | 1.75 | 1.28 | 1.09 | 1.82 | 1.84 | 1.75 |
| P/B Ratio | 56.95 | 41.16 | 84.80 | 86.13 | 153.56 | 28.61 | 12.58 | 40.44 | 10.39 | 30.27 | — |
| P/FCF | 8.83 | 6.40 | 12.59 | 11.87 | 6.55 | 8.11 | 7.73 | 105.31 | 11.01 | 7.74 | 11.52 |
| P/OCF | 7.96 | 5.77 | 11.07 | 10.82 | 5.99 | 7.49 | 7.08 | 26.36 | 9.27 | 6.84 | 9.65 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.52 | 2.36 | 2.48 | 1.75 | 2.07 | 1.60 | 1.63 | 1.75 | 1.79 | 1.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.85 | — | 9.40 | 9.66 | 6.92 | 8.07 | 6.26 | 12.24 | 6.91 | 6.03 | 6.33 |
| EV / EBIT | — | 6.40 | 10.34 | 10.64 | 7.76 | 9.57 | 7.43 | 46.54 | 8.56 | 7.45 | 7.87 |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.91 | 14.83 | 13.63 | 8.09 | 9.58 | 9.69 | 158.21 | 10.59 | 7.51 | 12.33 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 44.3% | 44.5% | 44.8% | 44.6% | 45.7% | 45.7% | 35.1% | 43.2% | 44.9% | 45.8% |
| Operating Margin | -32.7% | -32.7% | 22.0% | 22.3% | 21.6% | 21.5% | 21.5% | 6.9% | 19.9% | 23.8% | 23.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.6% | 18.6% | 16.1% | 16.5% | 15.9% | 16.0% | 16.0% | -0.3% | 13.7% | 19.4% | 13.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 710.9% | 710.9% | 675.0% | 970.7% | 454.4% | 196.3% | 261.5% | -2.5% | 115.2% | 935.2% | — |
| ROA | 22.5% | 22.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 17.5% | 16.0% | 12.6% | -0.2% | 14.3% | 23.1% | 14.7% |
| ROIC | -71.7% | -71.7% | 46.4% | 49.6% | 44.8% | 40.1% | 37.4% | 14.9% | 263.6% | 333.2% | 129.7% |
| ROCE | -61.0% | -61.0% | 39.4% | 36.8% | 34.0% | 31.3% | 24.7% | 6.2% | 27.9% | 39.6% | 40.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 17.89 | 17.89 | 26.41 | 24.59 | 67.85 | 10.17 | 6.19 | 60.75 | 2.76 | 7.79 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.49 | 2.40 | 2.47 | 2.43 | 2.46 | 12.24 | 1.91 | 1.60 | 1.66 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 9.73 | 15.13 | 12.72 | 36.18 | 5.20 | 3.17 | 20.31 | -0.40 | -0.88 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.42 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.24 | 1.26 | 4.09 | -0.27 | -0.18 | 0.42 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.51 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.95 | 52.90 | -0.42 | -0.22 | 0.81 |
| Interest Coverage | 11.59 | 11.59 | 11.00 | 10.64 | 10.75 | 8.47 | 6.99 | 0.96 | 7.26 | 8.48 | 7.77 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.90 | 1.27 | 1.26 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.96 | 2.16 | 2.27 | 1.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.90 | 1.27 | 1.26 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.96 | 2.16 | 2.27 | 1.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.77 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 0.91 | 1.83 | 1.89 | 2.95 | 1.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.21 | 1.15 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.06 | 0.95 | 0.52 | 0.94 | 1.21 | 1.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 5.39 | 6.17 | 6.98 | 10.08 | 27.54 | 55.99 | 18.42 | 16.39 | 18.38 | 19.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.2% | 4.4% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 3.6% | 3.1% | 4.4% | 7.1% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 28.8% | 28.8% | 32.6% | 30.2% | 32.1% | 33.7% | 35.2% | — | 48.6% | 32.7% | 45.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 11.0% | 15.2% | 8.0% | 7.6% | 11.0% | 9.1% | 13.1% | — | 7.5% | 10.6% | 7.7% |
| FCF Yield | 11.3% | 15.6% | 7.9% | 8.4% | 15.3% | 12.3% | 12.9% | 0.9% | 9.1% | 12.9% | 8.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 7.7% | 10.6% | 5.8% | 4.9% | 11.6% | 9.3% | 4.3% | 8.9% | 3.4% | 0.2% | 6.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.8% | 15.0% | 8.4% | 7.2% | 15.2% | 12.4% | 8.7% | 16.1% | 7.0% | 3.6% | 9.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $127M | $137M | $144M | $154M | $171M | $189M | $198M | $207M | $210M | $214M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HRB stock.
H&R Block, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.1x. The historical average is 15.9x. This places it at the 11th percentile of its historical range.
H&R Block, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.7x.
H&R Block, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 710.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 60.0%.
Based on historical data, H&R Block, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.1x. This is at the 11th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
H&R Block, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.15% with a payout ratio of 28.8%.
H&R Block, Inc. has 44.3% gross margin and -32.7% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Labor inflation and IRS Direct File
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value with Seasonal Distortions
Trading at 9.37x trailing earnings and 4.67x EV/EBITDA, HRB appears deeply undervalued versus Intuit's 26.21x P/E, but the market may be pricing in structural decline. According to reported figures, the PEG of 0.66 suggests growth is underpriced.
The valuation multiples are heavily influenced by the seasonal earnings pattern; trailing P/E of 9.37x is based on peak-quarter earnings, which may overstate normalized earnings power. The forward P/E of 10.33x implies the market expects modest growth, but the PEG of 0.66 suggests that at current prices, the market is pricing in a low-growth or declining scenario. Compared to Intuit's premium multiple, HRB trades at a significant discount, reflecting its mature, assisted-tax business model and the perceived threat from DIY software and IRS Direct File. Investors should consider whether the discount is warranted given the company's strong cash generation and capital return program.
Peak Margins Mask Off-Season Losses
Gross margin in fiscal 2026 Q4 reached 72.4%, up from 52.0% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, but off-peak quarters show negative margins. This suggests the company's true earning power is best measured on a trailing twelve-month basis.
The extreme seasonality of the tax business means that quarterly margins are not indicative of full-year profitability. While peak-quarter operating margins of 81.1% in Q4 2026 demonstrate strong operating leverage, off-peak quarters like Q2 2026 show operating margins of -150.3%, reflecting the high fixed-cost base. The trailing twelve-month net margin of approximately 25.7% (based on Q4 2026 annualized) is more representative of the company's earning power, but investors should adjust for non-recurring items and the timing of tax season shifts. The recent EPS beat of $5.69 versus $2.21 estimate suggests that management's strategic initiatives are improving profitability, but the sustainability of these gains is uncertain given labor cost pressures.
ROIC Volatility Reflects Seasonal Capital
ROIC swung from -14.4% in Q2 2025 to 58.6% in Q4 2026, based on reported figures, highlighting the extreme seasonality of invested capital. This suggests that annualized ROIC is more meaningful, but the company's ability to generate high returns on peak capital is evident.
The return on invested capital is distorted by the seasonal build-up of working capital and debt during off-peak quarters. In Q4 2026, ROIC of 58.6% is exceptionally high, but this is partly due to the denominator being low at that point in the cycle. Over the last ten quarters, cumulative net income of approximately $2.7B against average invested capital suggests a normalized ROIC in the mid-teens, which is respectable for a mature services company. The improvement in ROIC from 21.2% in Q4 2025 to 58.6% in Q4 2026 indicates that management's focus on higher-margin services is enhancing capital efficiency, but investors should monitor whether this is sustainable or a one-time benefit from tax season timing.
Working Capital Swings Drive Cash Flow
DSO spiked to 96 days in Q2 2026 from 14 days in Q4 2026, as per reported data, reflecting the seasonal timing of receivables. This suggests that working capital management is a key driver of quarterly cash flow volatility.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing inventory data, but the extreme swings in DSO and DPO indicate that H&R Block's working capital is heavily influenced by the tax season. In Q2 2026, DSO of 96 days and DPO of 447 days reflect the off-peak period when receivables are collected and payables are stretched, while in Q4 2026, DSO drops to 14 days as clients pay for services. This pattern suggests that the company has significant leverage over suppliers (as seen in high DPO) but also faces timing mismatches that require careful liquidity management. The asset turnover of 0.34 in Q4 2026 is low, reflecting the high seasonal asset base, but this is typical for the industry.
Seasonal Debt Loads and Negative Equity
Debt-to-equity reached 17.89 in Q4 2026, but equity was only $117.5M, as reported in financial statements, indicating that leverage is a seasonal necessity. Interest coverage of 23,299x in Q4 2026 suggests ample capacity, but off-peak quarters show negative coverage.
The balance sheet exhibits extreme seasonality, with debt peaking in off-peak quarters to fund operations and negative equity in many periods. In Q4 2026, D/E of 17.89 is misleading because equity is thin; the more relevant metric is D/EBITDA of 2.19, which is manageable. Interest coverage of 23,299x in Q4 2026 is artificially high due to low interest expense relative to peak earnings, but in off-peak quarters, coverage turns negative, indicating that the company relies on seasonal cash flows to service debt. The prior balance sheet analysis noted that negative equity is a recurring pattern, not a sign of distress, but investors should monitor the sustainability of this leverage, especially if interest rates rise or if the company continues aggressive buybacks.
Thin Liquidity Outside Tax Season
Current ratio fell to 0.76 in Q1 2026 and 0.73 in Q2 2025, as reported in financial statements, indicating that liquidity is tight during off-peak quarters. This suggests the company relies on seasonal cash flows and credit lines to meet obligations.
The current ratio is below 1.0 in off-peak quarters, which could signal liquidity stress if the company faced an unexpected cash need. However, the company has access to credit facilities and generates substantial cash during the tax season, as evidenced by the $1.6B operating cash flow in Q3 2026. The quick ratio is identical to the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a service business. The thin liquidity buffer in off-peak quarters is a risk, but the company's history of managing this seasonality suggests it is a structural feature rather than a sign of distress. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance debt and maintain access to credit in a rising rate environment.
Trading at a Steep Discount to Intuit
HRB's P/E of 9.37x and EV/EBITDA of 4.67x are far below Intuit's 26.21x and 17.75x, as per peer data, reflecting the market's view of HRB as a mature, low-growth business. This suggests the discount may be structural, not temporary.
Compared to Intuit, HRB has significantly lower valuation multiples, which is justified by its lower growth prospects and higher capital intensity. However, HRB's ROE of 6.3% in Q4 2026 is much lower than Intuit's 23.3%, but this is partly due to the seasonal equity base. On a normalized basis, HRB's return on capital is competitive, and its dividend yield of 3.1% is attractive versus Intuit's 1.2%. The market appears to be pricing HRB as a value stock with limited upside, but if the company successfully executes its small business and fintech pivot, the multiple could expand. Investors should compare HRB to other assisted tax preparers like Jackson Hewitt, though they are private, and to financial services companies like Green Dot for the Emerald Card business.
Misapplied P/E on Seasonal Earnings
The trailing P/E of 9.37x is commonly used to value HRB, but it is based on peak-quarter earnings and understates the true cost of off-season operations. According to reported figures, a normalized P/E using TTM earnings would be more appropriate.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for H&R Block is the trailing P/E, because it is calculated using the most recent quarter's annualized earnings, which are heavily skewed by the tax season. This can make the stock appear cheaper than it actually is, as off-peak quarters generate losses. Instead, investors should use a normalized P/E based on trailing twelve-month earnings or an EV/EBITDA multiple that smooths out seasonality. Additionally, the P/B ratio of 57.65 is meaningless given the negative equity in many quarters, so it should be disregarded. A better approach is to focus on price-to-cash flow or EV/EBITDA, which are less distorted by seasonal accounting. The company's strong cash generation and capital return program are better indicators of value than the headline P/E.