Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -236.2x · EV/EBITDA 24.5x · ROE -8.5%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $365M | $405M | $231M | $178M | $206M | $135M | $34M | $32M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $482M | $421M | $267M | $197M | $222M | $144M | $45M | $37M |
| P/E Ratio → | -236.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 778.00 | 9.33 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.53 | 6.61 | 5.99 | 2.81 | 4.58 | 3.19 | 3.63 | 4.02 | 3.27 | 1.27 | 1.60 |
| P/B Ratio | 23.34 | 34.58 | 17.26 | 5.22 | 14.88 | 21.15 | 6.62 | 7.51 | 5.47 | 13.02 | 4.95 |
| P/FCF | 28.83 | 42.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 28.10 | 41.06 | — | 95.13 | 237.73 | 45.49 | — | 216.74 | 197.22 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.27 | 6.90 | 3.70 | 4.76 | 3.68 | 4.03 | 4.34 | 3.48 | 1.69 | 1.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.55 | 34.43 | 62.98 | 41.64 | 88.69 | 79.57 | 87.43 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 36.56 | 88.19 | 151.81 | 593.99 | — | 79.38 | 263.46 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 46.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 75.1% | 75.3% | 69.6% | 71.3% | 74.9% | 70.4% | 67.3% | 60.1% | 49.6% | 50.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 14.2% | 4.4% | 0.3% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 0.8% | -9.4% | -12.6% | -45.4% | -79.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.9% | -1.9% | -8.8% | -18.7% | -15.9% | -24.8% | -6.9% | 0.3% | 35.4% | -44.8% | -95.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -8.5% | -8.5% | -25.1% | -50.2% | -73.8% | -95.4% | -12.4% | 0.6% | 106.9% | -264.9% | -756.4% |
| ROA | -1.3% | -1.3% | -5.0% | -10.4% | -11.0% | -23.1% | -5.8% | 0.3% | 39.9% | -46.8% | -92.3% |
| ROIC | 12.0% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 0.3% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 0.6% | -9.3% | -16.6% | -72.4% | -153.2% |
| ROCE | 12.9% | 12.9% | 3.2% | 0.2% | 1.7% | 2.4% | 0.8% | -11.4% | -18.7% | -68.6% | -121.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.84 | 4.84 | 3.30 | 2.72 | 4.12 | 7.13 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 5.86 | 2.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.38 | 4.38 | 10.46 | 16.47 | 23.63 | 23.24 | 10.44 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.44 | 2.62 | 1.66 | 0.59 | 3.27 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.35 | 4.32 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.11 | 3.11 | 8.30 | 10.06 | 3.36 | 10.67 | 8.62 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.40 | 0.04 | -0.93 | 0.62 | 0.33 | -0.28 | -1.91 | -4.02 | -5.55 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.08 | 2.82 | 6.35 | 6.24 | 3.79 | 2.99 | 2.76 | 1.53 | 1.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.06 | 2.06 | 1.96 | 2.60 | 6.00 | 5.81 | 3.43 | 2.72 | 2.61 | 1.14 | 1.30 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.52 | 1.68 | 5.47 | 5.21 | 3.03 | 2.44 | 2.36 | 0.70 | 0.89 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 1.12 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.02 | 5.02 | 4.60 | 3.65 | 3.88 | 4.32 | 3.65 | 5.07 | 9.01 | 6.00 | 5.34 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 148.65 | 213.21 | 102.30 | 26.32 | 22.75 | 19.88 | 14.33 | 17.33 | 22.14 | 53.46 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | 10.7% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.5% | 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $37M | $36M | $33M | $27M | $27M | $26M | $26M | $24M | $20M | $13M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HROW stock.
Harrow Health, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -236.2x. The historical average is 9.3x.
Harrow Health, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 24.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 65.8x.
Harrow Health, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -8.5%. The historical average is -109.6%.
Based on historical data, Harrow Health, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -236.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Harrow Health, Inc. has 75.1% gross margin and 14.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Harrow Health, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and execution risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masked by SG&A Surge
Gross margin improved to 71.3% in Q2 2026 from 61.2% in Q1, yet operating margin fell to -15.6% as SG&A consumed 75% of revenue, per recent financial statements.
The gross margin recovery suggests the branded portfolio is gaining pricing traction, but the sequential swing from a 27.0% operating margin in Q4 2025 to -15.6% in Q2 2026 reveals that commercialization costs are scaling faster than revenue. This implies the company is in a deliberate investment phase, though the lack of operating leverage raises questions about the sustainability of the second-half acceleration narrative. Investors should monitor whether SG&A growth moderates as a percentage of revenue, as the current trajectory suggests profitability is highly sensitive to revenue conversion.
Return on Capital Decaying Amid Leverage
ROIC swung from 7.9% in Q4 2025 to -3.5% in Q2 2026, while ROE deteriorated to -80.0%, reflecting eroding equity and heavy debt-funded expansion, as reported in quarterly filings.
The collapse in ROIC and ROE is driven by both negative operating income and a shrinking equity base, which fell to $15.2M in Q2 2026. This suggests the company is not compounding returns but rather burning capital to build its branded platform, with the Q4 2025 profitability appearing as an outlier rather than a trend. The negative ROE is amplified by the high debt-to-equity ratio, meaning any recovery in operating income will be partially offset by rising interest costs, warranting close monitoring of capital allocation efficiency.
Working Capital Stretch Signals Strain
DSO spiked to 142 days in Q2 2026 from 97 days in Q4 2025, while CCC rose to 82 days, indicating slower cash collection and potential revenue quality concerns, based on reported figures.
The sharp increase in DSO suggests that revenue growth may be increasingly reliant on extended payment terms or that gross-to-net adjustments are delaying cash conversion, a common issue in branded pharma transitions. The CCC of 82 days, up from 28 days in Q4 2025, indicates that working capital is absorbing cash rather than generating it, which is consistent with the negative FCF margin of -13.5%. This implies that the company's liquidity position could deteriorate further if DSO does not normalize, especially given the negative operating cash flow in Q2 2026.
Leverage Spikes Threaten Flexibility
Debt-to-equity surged to 20.26 in Q2 2026 from 4.84 in Q4 2025, with interest coverage at -1.76, indicating debt service is outpacing operating income, as per balance sheet data.
The dramatic increase in leverage, driven by a combination of rising debt and eroding equity, suggests that the company's financial flexibility is severely constrained. Negative interest coverage implies that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, forcing reliance on cash reserves or additional borrowing. This makes the company highly sensitive to interest rate movements and raises refinancing risk, particularly if the second-half revenue acceleration fails to materialize. Investors should monitor debt covenants and the trajectory of EBITDA, as the current D/EBITDA of 8.74 in Q4 2025 already indicates elevated risk.
Cash Buffer Masks Underlying Burn
Current ratio improved to 2.24 in Q2 2026, but negative operating cash flow of -$9.8M and a 13.5% negative FCF margin suggest the $83.9M cash buffer may erode quickly, per cash flow statements.
While the current ratio appears healthy, it is inflated by the cash balance that is being consumed by ongoing losses and working capital outflows. The negative FCF margin indicates that the company is burning cash at a rate that, if sustained, could deplete the buffer within several quarters. This suggests that liquidity is adequate in the near term but vulnerable to prolonged execution delays, especially given the high leverage and negative interest coverage. The reliance on cash reserves rather than operating cash flow to service debt underscores the fragility of the current position.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Distorts Value
EV/EBITDA of 29.06 appears rich, but the metric is distorted by negative EBITDA in recent quarters, making forward EV/EBITDA of 63.02 more reflective of expected profitability, based on valuation data.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Harrow is EV/EBITDA, as the company's EBITDA has been volatile and negative in several quarters, rendering the trailing multiple meaningless. Investors may be tempted to use the forward multiple, but it embeds aggressive assumptions about margin recovery that have yet to materialize. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Sales, which at 5.48 reflects the market's premium for future growth, but even this should be adjusted for the heavy SG&A burden and the potential for sustained losses. The reliance on EBITDA also obscures the impact of equity method investments and stock-based compensation, which are non-cash but dilutive to shareholders.