Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.1x · EV/EBITDA 7.6x · ROE 17.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.5B | $9.6B | $2.8B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $2.7B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.9B | $10.0B | $3.6B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.15 | 14.22 | 3.44 | 13.32 | — | — | 40.78 | — | — | 5.45 | 32.08 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.96 | 3.30 | 1.72 | 1.24 | 1.29 | 1.70 | 1.41 | 1.64 | 1.55 | 2.49 | 1.65 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.73 | 2.26 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.96 | 0.72 |
| P/FCF | 14.90 | 12.44 | — | — | — | — | 58.48 | 20.11 | — | 48.84 | 120.89 |
| P/OCF | 10.74 | 8.96 | 7.17 | 10.26 | 3.39 | 5.23 | 5.05 | 4.81 | 8.98 | 9.23 | 5.19 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.45 | 2.22 | 1.83 | 1.90 | 1.69 | 1.08 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 2.24 | 1.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.62 | 6.41 | 2.97 | 8.18 | 6.42 | 8.74 | 3.26 | — | 5.21 | 2.86 | 4.99 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.55 | 9.14 | 3.72 | 19.33 | 57.58 | — | 12.48 | — | 65.32 | 3.99 | 12.40 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.98 | — | — | — | — | 44.87 | 15.93 | — | 43.96 | 108.53 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 41.2% | 33.7% | 12.6% | 15.4% | 7.1% | 20.2% | 6.5% | 12.3% | 14.0% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 38.9% | 38.9% | 57.8% | -0.0% | 4.3% | -11.9% | 11.7% | -31.7% | 3.1% | 53.0% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% | 50.2% | 9.6% | -7.3% | -29.1% | 3.4% | -38.7% | -2.5% | 45.8% | 5.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 28.9% | 4.2% | -3.1% | -10.5% | 1.7% | -15.8% | -1.0% | 19.6% | 2.5% |
| ROA | 11.5% | 11.5% | 16.5% | 2.1% | -1.6% | -6.0% | 1.1% | -10.5% | -0.7% | 13.6% | 1.6% |
| ROIC | 19.1% | 19.1% | 20.1% | -0.0% | 1.2% | -3.5% | 5.2% | -10.9% | 1.0% | 18.6% | 1.1% |
| ROCE | 21.2% | 21.2% | 21.6% | -0.0% | 1.1% | -2.8% | 3.9% | -9.2% | 0.9% | 16.7% | 1.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.95 | 4.30 | 3.50 | 3.13 | 1.29 | — | 1.38 | 0.46 | 1.65 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.26 | -0.01 | -0.16 | -0.15 | -0.08 | -0.10 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.66 | 2.64 | 2.06 | -0.09 | -0.99 | — | -0.75 | -0.32 | -0.57 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.54 | — | — | — | — | -13.60 | -4.19 | — | -4.88 | -12.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.07 | 10.07 | — | — | — | — | 7.37 | -22.84 | 8.51 | 59.38 | 4.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.21 | 1.19 | 2.35 | 1.64 | 4.17 | 4.75 | 4.78 | 5.02 | 5.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 2.04 | 1.12 | 3.19 | 3.59 | 3.57 | 4.16 | 4.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 2.83 | 3.16 | 3.23 | 3.42 | 3.34 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.53 | 4.53 | 3.98 | 3.24 | 4.06 | 2.70 | 3.03 | 3.23 | 3.55 | 4.71 | 4.26 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 7.64 | 0.69 | 25.07 | 31.60 | 20.15 | 23.72 | 17.61 | 20.76 | 48.67 | 2.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | 7.0% | 29.1% | 7.5% | — | — | 2.5% | — | — | 18.4% | 3.1% |
| FCF Yield | 6.7% | 8.0% | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | 5.0% | — | 2.0% | 0.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $582M | $546M | $485M | $479M | $477M | $478M | $468M | $467M | $468M | $424M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IAG stock.
Iamgold Corporation's current P/E ratio is 17.1x. The historical average is 29.5x. This places it at the 43th percentile of its historical range.
Iamgold Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 7.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.8x.
Iamgold Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 3.1%.
Based on historical data, Iamgold Corporation is trading at a P/E of 17.1x. This is at the 43th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Iamgold Corporation has 41.2% gross margin and 38.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Iamgold Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
West African geopolitical instability
Margin Expansion from Côté Scale
Gross margin expanded from 27.9% in 2024Q4 to 47.3% in 2026Q2, as reported in quarterly filings, reflecting Côté Gold's lower-cost profile and higher gold prices. Operating margin reached 45.0%, surpassing peers like Eldorado Gold.
The margin trajectory is not merely a function of gold prices; it reflects a structural shift in the asset mix. Côté Gold's open-pit, high-tonnage operation is replacing higher-cost production from Westwood and Essakane, which historically dragged consolidated margins. The 2024Q3 operating margin of 138.4% was distorted by a one-time gain, so the clean trend from 25.8% in 2024Q1 to 45.0% in 2026Q2 is more indicative of underlying earning power. However, investors should monitor whether Westwood's seismic challenges and Essakane's geopolitical risks can be contained, as any disruption would compress margins.
ROIC Inflects as Côté Ramps
ROIC improved from 2.2% in 2024Q1 to 6.3% in 2026Q2, as per financial statements, driven by margin expansion and asset turnover gains. This suggests the capital-intensive Côté investment is beginning to generate returns above the cost of capital.
The ROIC trend is a classic inflection story: during the construction phase, capital employed ballooned while earnings were suppressed, compressing returns. With Côté now in commercial production, the denominator is stabilizing while EBITDA grows, lifting ROIC. The 2026Q2 ROIC of 6.3% is still below the company's cost of equity, but the forward trajectory is positive. If Côté achieves nameplate capacity and gold prices hold, ROIC could approach the mid-teens, aligning with peers like Eldorado Gold. The key driver is asset turnover, which improved from 0.07 in 2024Q1 to 0.14 in 2026Q2, indicating that the asset base is becoming more productive.
Working Capital Efficiency Tightens
Cash conversion cycle improved from -10 days in 2024Q1 to 17 days in 2026Q2, as reported in quarterly data, reflecting a shift from negative to positive working capital. DSO fell from 14 to 3 days, indicating faster gold sales collection.
The CCC swing is largely due to the normalization of DPO, which dropped from 125 days in 2024Q1 to 61 days in 2026Q2, as the company paid down construction-related payables. The current CCC of 17 days is still efficient for a gold producer, as inventory (DIO of 75 days) is offset by supplier credit. The improvement in DSO to 3 days reflects the spot-sale nature of gold bullion, which is a positive sign of cash conversion. However, the increase in DIO from 61 to 75 days over the past year warrants monitoring, as it may indicate stockpiling of ore or concentrate, which could tie up cash if not processed.
Deleveraging Accelerates Post-Côté
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.41 in 2024Q1 to 0.12 in 2026Q2, as per balance sheet data, while interest coverage rose from 40.76 to 37.83. This indicates a rapidly strengthening balance sheet as Côté generates cash.
The deleveraging is a direct result of the Côté ramp-up, which has generated substantial operating cash flow, allowing the company to pay down debt. Total debt declined from $1.2B in 2025Q2 to $539.2M in 2026Q2, while equity grew to $4.4B. The D/EBITDA ratio improved from 7.98 in 2024Q4 to 1.09 in 2026Q2, indicating that EBITDA now comfortably covers debt. Interest coverage of 37.83x is robust, but the 2026Q1 figure of 206.31x was inflated by a one-time gain; the normalized level is still strong. The remaining risk is refinancing exposure, but with low leverage and strong cash flow, this appears manageable.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved from 0.89 in 2024Q3 to 1.71 in 2026Q2, as reported in quarterly data, while cash increased to $500.8M. This provides a solid buffer against operational disruptions, particularly in Burkina Faso.
The liquidity position has transformed from a stressed state during the Côté construction to a comfortable one. The quick ratio of 1.05 in 2026Q2 indicates that even without selling inventory, the company can cover current liabilities. This is crucial given the geopolitical risk at Essakane, where a temporary suspension could strain cash flows. The improvement is driven by retained earnings turning positive and the cessation of heavy capital spending. However, the company still has no dividend, and management has prioritized buybacks, which could reduce the cash buffer if gold prices decline. Investors should monitor whether the liquidity cushion remains adequate if West African security deteriorates.
Misapplied P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 15.78 understates IAG's value because current earnings are cyclically elevated by record gold prices and one-time gains. Forward P/E of 8.54 is more indicative, but investors should adjust for normalized gold prices.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for IAG is the P/E, because gold producers' earnings are highly sensitive to commodity prices, which are cyclical. The trailing P/E of 15.78 is misleadingly low relative to the forward P/E of 8.54, but both are based on current gold prices that may not persist. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 7.04 is in line with peers like Kinross (7.40) and Eldorado (8.56), but this too is distorted by the current price environment. Analysts should use a normalized gold price scenario to estimate sustainable earnings and apply a mid-cycle multiple. Additionally, the 2024Q3 net income included a $594.1M gain from asset sales, which inflates trailing earnings and understates the true P/E. Adjusting for that, the P/E would be higher, making the stock appear less cheap than it seems.