Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.1x · EV/EBITDA 10.9x · ROE 9.8%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $201M | $291M | $167M | $236M | $232M | $394M | $164M | $120M | $195M | $179M | $133M |
| Enterprise Value | $243M | $333M | $209M | $301M | $287M | $427M | $205M | $196M | $274M | $265M | $221M |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.11 | 30.42 | 55.67 | 39.25 | 11.79 | 25.40 | 54.67 | 36.04 | 35.33 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.82 | 1.19 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.42 | 0.66 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.23 | 3.07 | 1.74 | 2.32 | 2.31 | 4.01 | 1.65 | 1.34 | 2.49 | 2.82 | 2.28 |
| P/FCF | 8.04 | 11.64 | 9.81 | 26.74 | 30.03 | 9.95 | 3.83 | 6.51 | 12.91 | 21.68 | 16.06 |
| P/OCF | 6.93 | 10.03 | 8.41 | 19.26 | 20.81 | 9.40 | 3.73 | 5.90 | 10.21 | 15.68 | 12.51 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.36 | 0.84 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.54 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.87 | 14.90 | 17.95 | 14.41 | 8.24 | 13.94 | 13.25 | 9.78 | 13.41 | 12.13 | 41.85 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.64 | 18.70 | 18.89 | 20.11 | 9.63 | 16.76 | 21.73 | 14.62 | 20.63 | 25.53 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.32 | 12.27 | 34.02 | 37.20 | 10.77 | 4.79 | 10.60 | 18.12 | 32.06 | 26.61 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 41.2% | 39.3% | 38.5% | 40.7% | 39.4% | 39.8% | 42.4% | 42.0% | 41.9% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 7.3% | 2.3% | 5.0% | 10.3% | 9.1% | 3.7% | 5.0% | 4.6% | 3.4% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.8% | 3.8% | 1.1% | 2.1% | 6.9% | 5.6% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 2.1% | -0.8% | -3.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.8% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 6.1% | 19.8% | 15.7% | 2.9% | 4.0% | 8.0% | -3.5% | -12.3% |
| ROA | 4.5% | 4.5% | 1.3% | 2.5% | 8.2% | 6.5% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.6% | -0.9% | -3.6% |
| ROIC | 9.7% | 9.7% | 2.8% | 6.8% | 15.4% | 14.0% | 4.6% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 4.6% | -1.7% |
| ROCE | 10.6% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 7.4% | 15.9% | 13.7% | 5.1% | 7.6% | 7.3% | 5.2% | -1.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 1.05 | 1.24 | 1.80 | 2.09 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.16 | 3.16 | 5.57 | 4.17 | 2.47 | 2.61 | 5.48 | 4.68 | 4.77 | 5.23 | 23.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 1.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.87 | 1.87 | 3.59 | 3.09 | 1.59 | 1.05 | 2.65 | 3.77 | 3.85 | 3.93 | 16.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.68 | 2.46 | 7.29 | 7.17 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 4.09 | 5.21 | 10.38 | 10.55 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.38 | 4.38 | 1.90 | 2.42 | 9.45 | 10.87 | 2.65 | 2.14 | 1.99 | 1.52 | -1.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.38 | 2.44 | 2.26 | 2.04 | 2.26 | 2.42 | 2.42 | 1.95 | 2.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.38 | 2.44 | 2.26 | 2.04 | 2.26 | 2.42 | 2.42 | 1.95 | 2.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.66 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.16 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.17 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 1.28 | 1.20 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 76.51 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.61 | 86.72 | 102.98 | 102.22 | 84.53 | 98.86 | 105.86 | 100.50 | 95.90 | 109.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | 3.2% | 5.6% | 3.7% | 3.2% | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 330.9% | 141.2% | 37.8% | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 2.5% | 8.5% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 2.8% | 2.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 12.4% | 8.6% | 10.2% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 10.0% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 7.7% | 4.6% | 6.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.6% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 2.6% | 7.0% | 5.9% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 8.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.0% | 6.3% | 10.2% | 6.3% | 10.2% | 7.1% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 8.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $50M | $50M | $50M | $52M | $50M | $48M | $46M | $43M | $37M |
Consultant utilization volatility
Based on current market data, III trades at a TTM P/E of 22.11, which appears elevated relative to its recent -1.16% revenue contraction, suggesting that investors are pricing in a potential recovery or a premium for the firm's proprietary data assets rather than current operational performance.
The forward P/E of 18.10 indicates that the market anticipates some earnings improvement, yet the valuation remains disconnected from the company's inability to consistently expand margins. Investors should monitor whether the current P/S of 0.82 represents a value opportunity or a fair reflection of the firm's limited operating leverage compared to higher-growth peers like Gartner.
As reported in financial statements, III's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive momentum, fluctuating between -1.6% and 3.8% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company is currently failing to generate returns that meaningfully exceed its cost of capital in the current advisory environment.
The low ROIC trend suggests that the firm's historical acquisitions, reflected in the significant goodwill balance, have not yet yielded the expected synergies to drive compounding returns. This performance gap against peers like CRA International, which maintains significantly higher ROIC, warrants investigation into whether the current business model can ever achieve sustainable capital efficiency.
According to recent SEC filings, III's Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) has remained elevated, frequently exceeding 90 days, which highlights a structural inefficiency in converting advisory project work into cash and places persistent pressure on the company's short-term liquidity and overall working capital management.
The inability to compress the collection cycle suggests that III lacks significant leverage over its enterprise clients, forcing the firm to act as a temporary financier for its own consulting engagements. This inefficiency is particularly concerning given the thin net margins, as any delay in client payments directly impacts the firm's ability to fund ongoing operations without relying on cash reserves.
Based on the latest quarterly data, III has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio to 0.09 as of 2026Q1, a significant improvement from the 0.85 level seen in 2023Q4, which provides the firm with a fortress-like balance sheet to navigate periods of cyclical revenue volatility.
While this deleveraging strategy minimizes interest coverage risk, it also raises questions about whether management is being overly cautious by not deploying capital to accelerate growth. Investors should monitor if this balance sheet strength will eventually be utilized for strategic M&A to pivot the revenue mix toward higher-margin software platforms.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to III because it obscures the high proportion of non-cash amortization charges and stock-based compensation that distort the firm's true economic earning power, making the business appear less profitable than its actual cash-generating capacity might suggest to a casual observer.
Analysts should instead focus on P/FCF or EV/EBITDA, as these metrics better account for the lumpy nature of project-based revenue and the significant impact of working capital swings. Relying solely on P/E risks ignoring the underlying quality of earnings, which is heavily influenced by the timing of large advisory contract milestones.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying III stock.
Information Services Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 22.1x. The historical average is 37.7x. This places it at the 8th percentile of its historical range.
Information Services Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.8x.
Information Services Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.8%. The historical average is -4.5%.
Based on historical data, Information Services Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 22.1x. This is at the 8th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Information Services Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.34%.
Information Services Group, Inc. has 41.2% gross margin and 7.3% operating margin.
Information Services Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.