Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.7x · EV/EBITDA 3.6x · ROE N/A. (2019–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $54M | $20M | $12M | $62M | $474M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $225M | $191M | $253M | $263M | $404M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 2.02 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 18.38 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 16.48 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.72 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.59 | 3.04 | 59.34 | 5.87 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 15.68 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 42.6% | 16.5% | 33.6% | 34.9% | 39.2% | 36.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -1.4% | -28.5% | -14.1% | -13.1% | — | -0.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.9% | -1.9% | -15.7% | -7.0% | -9.5% | -0.3% | -2.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -1.8% | -1.8% | -13.6% | -8.4% | -16.7% | -0.5% | -5.8% |
| ROIC | -4.7% | -4.7% | -66.7% | -29.1% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -5.4% | -5.4% | -79.0% | -142.7% | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.29 | 3.29 | 66.34 | 6.31 | — | 5.33 | 2.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.73 | 2.73 | 56.42 | 4.48 | — | -8.87 | -9.75 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -2.70 | -5.10 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.89 | -1.89 | -82.89 | -169.28 | -47.96 | — | -1.71 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.28 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.61 | 1.37 | 2.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.06 | 4.60 | 4.02 | 4.31 | 7.68 | 19.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 0.3% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 5.4% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 1.6% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.3% | 1.6% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $58308 |
Fixed lease obligation insolvency
According to current market data, the company trades at a P/S multiple of 0.19, which, as reported in financial statements, reflects deep investor skepticism regarding the firm's ability to achieve sustainable profitability given the persistent revenue contraction and the inherent risks associated with its high-fixed-cost business model.
The low P/S ratio suggests that the market is pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented platform. Investors should monitor whether this valuation discount is a temporary reaction to sector-wide headwinds or a permanent re-rating of the company's long-term earnings potential.
Based on the company's reported figures, ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -6.8% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its investment in luxury property leases and associated operational infrastructure.
The volatility in ROIC, which swung from 16.5% in 2024Q3 to negative levels, highlights the extreme sensitivity of the business to occupancy fluctuations. This trend suggests that the current capital allocation strategy is failing to generate returns that exceed the cost of maintaining the leased portfolio.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio remains stagnant at approximately 0.24, which, when compared to industry peers, suggests that the firm is struggling to extract sufficient revenue from its existing asset base to cover its substantial fixed lease obligations.
The high DPO levels, often exceeding 100 days, may indicate that the company is relying on extended payment terms with suppliers to manage its cash position. This reliance on supplier leverage warrants further investigation, as it may mask underlying liquidity constraints that could surface during periods of reduced demand.
According to recent balance sheet data, the current ratio of 0.24 in 2025Q3 underscores a precarious liquidity position, suggesting that the company lacks the necessary short-term assets to comfortably meet its immediate obligations without relying on external financing or further asset liquidation.
The lack of a meaningful quick ratio buffer leaves the company highly vulnerable to any sudden decline in membership renewals or travel bookings. Investors should monitor the company's ability to maintain its current operations without resorting to dilutive capital raises or further cost-cutting measures.
Data from recent financial reports suggests that the market frequently misapplies platform-based valuation multiples to this business, failing to account for the fact that the company's fixed lease obligations function more like debt than the variable costs typical of true asset-light technology platforms.
Using standard P/S or EV/EBITDA multiples obscures the reality that the company carries significant off-balance-sheet lease risk that does not scale with revenue. Analysts should instead focus on lease-adjusted metrics that treat these obligations as core debt to better understand the true financial leverage of the firm.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ISPO stock.
Inspirato Incorporated's current P/E ratio is -4.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Inspirato Incorporated's current EV/EBITDA is 3.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 22.8x.
Based on historical data, Inspirato Incorporated is trading at a P/E of -4.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Inspirato Incorporated has 42.6% gross margin and -1.4% operating margin.
Inspirato Incorporated's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.