Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA 30.5x · ROE -25.3%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $1.7B | $2.7B | $1.8B | $2.1B | $4.5B | $4.0B | $5.6B | $5.1B | $7.4B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.8B | $9.9B | $9.9B | $6.6B | $5.4B | $7.3B | $7.8B | $7.8B | $6.2B | $8.3B | $8.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.80 | 26.77 | 6.55 | 10.10 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.75 | 1.36 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 1.05 | 1.16 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.72 | 0.79 | 1.03 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 1.18 | 1.02 | 1.16 | 1.10 | 1.52 | 1.91 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 7.00 | — | 19.07 | 49.04 | 37.57 | 12.35 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 18.93 | 4.62 | 5.53 | 2.76 | — | 3.86 | 4.15 | 5.27 | 4.70 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.09 | 1.07 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 1.21 | 2.65 | 0.96 | 0.82 | 1.18 | 1.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.55 | 30.89 | — | 20.09 | 23.04 | 17.62 | — | 6.11 | 9.07 | 6.09 | 5.32 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.56 | 8.91 | 8.49 | 6.84 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 11.30 | — | 26.55 | 60.65 | 42.14 | 13.89 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 33.9% | 24.7% | 24.1% | 21.5% | 14.7% | -20.0% | 33.8% | 33.0% | 37.1% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | -4.1% | -7.4% | -2.4% | -3.3% | -1.3% | -58.0% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 13.9% | 19.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.6% | -6.6% | -8.6% | -3.2% | -4.0% | -3.0% | -45.8% | 7.0% | 2.5% | 16.3% | 11.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -25.3% | -25.3% | -26.6% | -9.0% | -9.8% | -4.7% | -30.9% | 12.1% | 4.0% | 25.8% | 20.1% |
| ROA | -3.4% | -3.4% | -4.9% | -2.1% | -2.5% | -1.3% | -10.7% | 5.1% | 1.9% | 11.8% | 8.0% |
| ROIC | -2.7% | -2.7% | -5.7% | -2.3% | -3.3% | -0.8% | -17.4% | 9.4% | 3.5% | 13.6% | 19.5% |
| ROCE | -2.7% | -2.7% | -5.5% | -2.1% | -2.7% | -0.7% | -17.2% | 9.3% | 3.5% | 13.3% | 18.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.84 | 4.84 | 3.46 | 1.78 | 1.23 | 1.25 | 1.45 | 0.66 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 32.05 | 32.05 | — | 18.02 | 18.57 | 11.57 | — | 2.48 | 2.42 | 0.88 | 0.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.87 | 2.73 | 1.43 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 25.65 | 25.65 | — | 14.47 | 14.16 | 6.71 | — | 1.72 | 1.74 | 0.66 | 0.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 4.30 | — | 7.48 | 11.61 | 4.57 | 1.53 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.33 | -0.33 | -0.27 | -0.16 | -1.11 | -4.76 | -11.16 | 12.52 | 8.55 | 15.95 | 12.23 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.10 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.95 | 1.25 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.06 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.93 | 1.22 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.93 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.83 | 1.14 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | 31.05 | 31.05 | 44.21 | 66.96 | 82.60 | 69.55 | 49.96 | 66.16 | 65.82 | 80.22 | 80.89 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 14.98 | 13.69 | 12.76 | 12.63 | 12.52 | 12.10 | 10.42 | 10.06 | 12.75 | 9.47 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.2% | 3.7% | 15.3% | 9.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | — | 5.2% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 8.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 4.1% | 9.7% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 1.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 4.1% | 9.7% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 1.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $369M | $347M | $333M | $324M | $318M | $278M | $298M | $315M | $330M | $342M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JBLU stock.
JetBlue Airways Corporation's current P/E ratio is -2.5x. The historical average is 23.3x.
JetBlue Airways Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 30.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.5x.
JetBlue Airways Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -25.3%. The historical average is 3.2%.
Based on historical data, JetBlue Airways Corporation is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
JetBlue Airways Corporation has 33.9% gross margin and -4.1% operating margin.
JetBlue Airways Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 32.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
GTF engine groundings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Structural Drag
Gross margin surged to 52.7% in Q2 2026 from 25.9% a year earlier, yet operating margin remained negative at -5.2%, indicating fuel tailwinds are not translating into sustainable profitability, as per quarterly financials.
The dramatic gross margin expansion reflects lower fuel costs and fare increases, but the persistent negative operating margin suggests non-fuel costs—labor, maintenance, and ownership—are absorbing the gains. The sequential improvement from -10.0% operating margin in Q1 2026 to -5.2% in Q2 2026 is encouraging, yet the company remains far from covering its fixed cost base. Investors should monitor whether CASM-ex fuel can decline as the A220 fleet matures, or if structural cost inflation will continue to cap margin recovery.
Capital Returns Deeply Negative
ROIC deteriorated from -7.1% in Q1 2024 to -1.1% in Q2 2026, while ROE fell to -14.5%, reflecting persistent losses and an eroding equity base, based on reported figures.
The improvement from the trough in Q1 2024 is real but leaves JetBlue far from earning its cost of capital. ROIC of -1.1% on a capital base dominated by aircraft and slots implies value destruction, and the trend in ROE is distorted by the shrinking equity denominator—equity fell to $1.6B from $2.6B over the period. The company is not compounding returns; it is consuming capital, and the path to positive ROIC hinges on achieving operating margins above 5% while maintaining asset turnover near current levels.
Working Capital Efficiency Holds Steady
Cash conversion cycle improved to -15 days in Q2 2026 from -13 days in Q4 2024, driven by extended payables (DPO up to 50 days), while DSO remained stable at 14 days, as per financial statements.
JetBlue's negative CCC is typical for airlines, as cash is collected from ticket sales well before flights are operated. The extension of DPO from 33 to 50 days over the period suggests JetBlue is stretching supplier payments, which may indicate tightening liquidity but also reflects negotiated terms. Asset turnover has been stable at 0.13-0.16, implying that revenue growth is not yet translating into more efficient use of the asset base. The modest improvement in CCC is a positive, but it is not a driver of value creation given the scale of losses.
Leverage Escalates as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity climbed to 5.91 in Q2 2026 from 2.35 in Q1 2024, with interest coverage at -0.84x, indicating earnings are insufficient to service debt, according to recent SEC filings.
The doubling of leverage is a direct consequence of cumulative losses eroding equity while debt remains elevated at $9.4B. Negative interest coverage means JetBlue is not generating operating income to cover interest expense, forcing reliance on cash reserves and new financing. The D/EBITDA ratio of 223x in Q2 2026 is distorted by near-zero EBITDA, but the trend is alarming. Refinancing risk is elevated, and any further deterioration in operating performance could strain covenant compliance, though specific covenants are not disclosed.
Liquidity Cushion Thins Rapidly
Current ratio fell to 0.70 in Q2 2026 from 1.10 in Q4 2024, with cash of $1.7B against total debt of $9.4B, signaling a shrinking buffer, based on balance sheet data.
A current ratio below 1.0 indicates JetBlue's current liabilities exceed current assets, a common situation for airlines due to large air traffic liabilities, but the decline from 1.10 to 0.70 is steep. The quick ratio of 0.63 suggests limited ability to cover near-term obligations without inventory, which is minimal. While the $2.7B in deferred revenue provides some cash cushion, it is refundable and tied to future travel, so it does not represent free liquidity. Under a severe demand shock, JetBlue would likely need to draw on credit facilities or raise capital, given the negative free cash flow.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Leverage
EV/EBITDA of 33x appears expensive, but forward EV/EBITDA of 6.01x suggests the market expects a sharp EBITDA recovery, making the metric misleading for a loss-making airline, as per valuation data.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for JetBlue is EV/EBITDA, because EBITDA is currently near zero, inflating the multiple and obscuring the company's true earnings power. The forward multiple of 6.01x implies the market is pricing in a significant EBITDA rebound, which may or may not materialize given structural cost pressures. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and aircraft rent), which normalizes for the heavy lease burden and provides a clearer picture of operating performance. Investors should focus on unlevered free cash flow and the ability to service debt, rather than EBITDA, which excludes the very costs that are straining the balance sheet.