Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -40.0%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $11M | $3.4B | $1.2B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1M | $6M | $3.4B | $1.2B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 6.04 | 2.37 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.15 | 0.12 | 43.04 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.01 | 6.02 | 2.42 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 3.4% | 3.4% | -2.0% | -3.2% | 5.7% | 6.3% | 7.2% |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | -5.8% | -9.2% | -16.0% | 0.1% | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.9% | -5.9% | -8.8% | -14.6% | 0.6% | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -40.0% | -40.0% | -184.8% | -2810.0% | 16.3% | 90.0% | 49.9% |
| ROA | -16.8% | -16.8% | -34.8% | -64.3% | 2.6% | 8.3% | 3.9% |
| ROIC | -33.1% | -33.1% | -119.7% | -225.9% | 1.7% | 404.0% | — |
| ROCE | -34.5% | -34.5% | -131.9% | -404.7% | 2.0% | 78.2% | 65.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.30 | — | 1.66 | 1.82 | 2.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 36.86 | 2.29 | 1.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.06 | -0.16 | — | 0.75 | -0.58 | -1.38 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 16.73 | -0.73 | -0.81 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -159.31 | -159.31 | -20.64 | -82.48 | 0.74 | 9.43 | 8.19 |
Net cash position: cash ($39M) exceeds total debt ($33M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.46 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.46 | 0.75 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.57 | 3.07 | 4.96 | 5.20 | 3.19 | 3.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 52.80 | 40.98 | 32.80 | 20.74 | 64.76 | 47.53 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 159.3% | 60.0% | 44.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $21M | $21M | $21M | $21M | $21M |
Structural margin compression risk
Based on reported figures, JYD trades at a P/S multiple of 0.02, which, according to recent SEC filings, suggests the market is pricing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented logistics provider, given the absence of positive earnings and the persistent negative operating margins.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are heavily discounting the company's top-line revenue, likely due to the realization that the vast majority of this revenue is pass-through carrier cost rather than retained service value. This valuation suggests that the market sees little evidence of a scalable, high-margin business model, warranting caution regarding the company's long-term enterprise value.
As reported in financial statements, JYD's ROIC has deteriorated significantly, falling to -34.3% in 2025Q4 from a peak of 97.0% in 2021Q4, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core logistics brokerage operations in the Shenzhen-Hong Kong corridor.
The sharp decline in return on invested capital suggests that the company's asset base is failing to generate sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current management team can pivot toward higher-margin service offerings or if the business model is structurally incapable of achieving sustainable profitability.
According to recent quarterly data, JYD's asset turnover ratio of 1.51 in 2025Q4, compared to historical highs near 2.5, suggests that the company is struggling to maintain operational efficiency as it navigates the complexities of managing high-frequency, low-volume shipments for its SME client base in a softening trade environment.
The fluctuation in asset turnover, combined with the inconsistent DSO trends, implies that the company's working capital management is highly sensitive to external trade cycles. Investors should monitor whether the company can stabilize its cash conversion cycle, as the current volatility appears to be a significant drag on overall liquidity and operational performance.
Based on reported financial statements, the most commonly misapplied metric for JYD is the headline revenue figure, which, at over $584 million, obscures the reality that the company operates as a low-margin broker where gross profit, rather than top-line volume, is the only meaningful measure of scale.
Analysts often mistake high revenue growth for market share expansion, failing to account for the fact that JYD acts as a principal in pass-through freight costs. A more accurate assessment of the business would focus on gross profit margins, which reveal the company's true earning power and its limited ability to command premium pricing in a hyper-competitive logistics market.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JYD stock.
Jayud Global Logistics Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Jayud Global Logistics Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -40.0%. The historical average is -13.7%.
Based on historical data, Jayud Global Logistics Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Jayud Global Logistics Limited has 3.4% gross margin and -5.8% operating margin.