Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -8.8x · EV/EBITDA 65.9x · ROE -14.1%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $970M | $508M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.0B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $3.1B | $1.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | -8.78 | — | 13.00 | — | 10.44 | 15.32 | 27.11 | 17.87 | 6.51 | 8.42 | 32.27 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.52 | 0.27 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.89 | 1.05 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 1.73 | 1.01 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.29 | 0.68 | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.13 | 1.99 | 2.16 | 1.90 | 1.59 | 3.96 | 3.50 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 26.08 | — | 58.69 | 11.72 | 43.42 | 14.75 | 10.10 | 14.10 | 37.81 |
| P/OCF | 387.96 | 203.32 | 15.47 | 208.02 | 13.29 | 8.40 | 16.82 | 9.68 | 7.08 | 10.82 | 15.44 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.56 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.93 | 1.15 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 1.82 | 1.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 65.95 | 45.79 | 8.24 | — | 5.58 | 7.34 | 10.40 | 8.15 | 3.73 | 8.45 | 13.75 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 8.01 | — | 7.99 | 10.40 | 19.00 | 11.69 | 4.65 | 9.67 | 23.35 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 35.87 | — | 65.10 | 12.16 | 47.39 | 15.54 | 10.73 | 14.82 | 45.69 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 11.5% | 19.0% | 9.9% | 20.3% | 23.0% | 21.4% | 22.3% | 33.8% | 32.3% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | -2.3% | 6.5% | -3.4% | 8.3% | 9.6% | 7.1% | 8.4% | 19.9% | 19.1% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.0% | -6.0% | 4.6% | -2.9% | 5.4% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 5.0% | 12.3% | 20.5% | 3.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -14.1% | -14.1% | 10.6% | -5.6% | 11.4% | 13.5% | 7.9% | 10.5% | 25.7% | 61.7% | 10.1% |
| ROA | -5.9% | -5.9% | 4.6% | -2.6% | 5.3% | 5.6% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 11.0% | 23.6% | 3.6% |
| ROIC | -2.5% | -2.5% | 8.0% | -3.9% | 11.9% | 14.9% | 9.4% | 12.0% | 27.1% | 31.2% | 8.7% |
| ROCE | -2.9% | -2.9% | 8.5% | -3.6% | 9.6% | 10.7% | 6.7% | 8.7% | 20.3% | 25.5% | 8.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.86 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 25.21 | 25.21 | 2.82 | — | 2.07 | 1.92 | 2.84 | 2.36 | 1.20 | 1.28 | 2.79 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.73 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 23.59 | 23.59 | 2.25 | — | 0.55 | 0.26 | 0.87 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 0.41 | 2.37 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 9.80 | — | 6.41 | 0.44 | 3.97 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 7.88 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.84 | -0.84 | 4.49 | -3.26 | 8.92 | 8.83 | 5.21 | 7.48 | 15.65 | 17.09 | 3.49 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.32 | 3.01 | 3.80 | 4.36 | 4.68 | 4.51 | 5.15 | 4.59 | 3.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.49 | 1.94 | 2.86 | 2.69 | 2.65 | 3.01 | 2.94 | 1.69 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.44 | 1.60 | 1.39 | 0.28 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.02 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 1.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.62 | 2.62 | 2.33 | 2.66 | 2.53 | 3.45 | 2.48 | 2.67 | 2.21 | 3.06 | 3.22 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 56.50 | 56.40 | 68.44 | 48.24 | 71.35 | 71.94 | 65.24 | 68.63 | 73.15 | 65.44 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 7.6% | 8.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.4% | 5.9% | 2.3% | 5.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 64.0% | — | 84.0% | 73.7% | 130.2% | 95.8% | 38.4% | 19.6% | 160.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 7.7% | — | 9.6% | 6.5% | 3.7% | 5.6% | 15.4% | 11.9% | 3.1% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 3.8% | — | 1.7% | 8.5% | 2.3% | 6.8% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 2.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 7.9% | 8.3% | 4.8% | 4.9% | 5.6% | 5.9% | 2.3% | 5.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $115M | $115M | $115M | $116M | $116M | $116M | $116M | $116M | $116M | $116M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KRO stock.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -8.8x. The historical average is 17.8x.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 65.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -14.1%. The historical average is 14.9%.
Based on historical data, Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -8.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.37%.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has 11.5% gross margin and -2.3% operating margin.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 25.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative margins and cyclicality
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery from Cyclical Trough
Gross margin rebounded to 18.4% in Q2 2026 from -0.9% in Q4 2025, yet remains below the 20%+ levels of mid-2024, indicating incomplete pricing power recovery.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from the Q4 2025 trough suggests that cost reduction initiatives and higher volumes are beginning to offset input cost pressures, but the margin is still below the 20%+ levels seen in mid-2024, implying that pricing power has not fully recovered. Operating margin turned positive at 6.7% in Q2 2026, a sharp swing from -15.6% in Q4 2025, but the TTM net margin remains negative at -5.96%, reflecting the lingering impact of the downturn. Investors should monitor whether this margin expansion is sustainable or merely a cyclical bounce, as the company's high fixed-cost base makes margins highly sensitive to volume and price fluctuations.
Return on Capital: A Fragile Turn
ROIC improved to 2.1% in Q2 2026 from -3.6% in Q4 2025, but remains well below the cost of capital, indicating that value creation is still elusive.
The return on invested capital has swung from negative territory in late 2025 to a modest positive 2.1% in Q2 2026, but this is far below the company's cost of capital, suggesting that the business is not yet generating economic profits. The improvement is driven by margin recovery rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained relatively stable around 0.25-0.32. Given the capital-intensive nature of TiO2 production, ROIC needs to exceed the cost of capital consistently to justify the current valuation, and the recent positive quarter is a step in that direction but not yet conclusive.
Working Capital Drag Eases but Remains High
Cash conversion cycle improved to 119 days in Q2 2026 from 183 days in Q4 2024, driven by lower DIO, yet remains elevated due to slow inventory turnover.
The cash conversion cycle has shortened from 183 days in Q4 2024 to 119 days in Q2 2026, primarily due to a reduction in days inventory outstanding from 165 to 105 days, which suggests better inventory management. However, the cycle remains long, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business and the need to hold significant raw material and finished goods inventory. Days sales outstanding have remained relatively stable around 63-72 days, indicating consistent customer payment terms, while days payable outstanding have increased slightly, providing some supplier financing. The improvement in CCC is a positive sign, but the absolute level still ties up substantial cash, which is a concern given the company's reduced cash position.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Cash Dwindles
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.78 in Q2 2026 from 0.58 in Q2 2024, while cash fell to $26.6M, leaving net debt at $562M and interest coverage at 2.61.
The reported debt-to-equity ratio of 0.78 understates the true leverage because cash reserves have dwindled from $133.8M in Q2 2024 to $26.6M in Q2 2026, making net debt approximately $562M. Interest coverage improved to 2.61 in Q2 2026 from a negative -5.09 in Q4 2025, but this is still thin, indicating that operating income is only about 2.6 times interest expense. The increase in debt, coupled with the decline in cash, suggests that the company is relying more on debt to fund operations and capital expenditures, which could become a concern if margins do not continue to recover.
Liquidity Buffer Thins but Remains Adequate
Current ratio improved to 3.30 in Q2 2026, but quick ratio of 1.55 and cash of $26.6M indicate a thinner buffer against a severe downturn.
The current ratio of 3.30 in Q2 2026 is strong, but the quick ratio of 1.55 suggests that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory, which may be harder to liquidate quickly in a downturn. Cash has declined sharply to $26.6M, which is only about 5% of total assets, leaving limited cushion for unexpected shocks. While the current ratio appears healthy, the reliance on inventory and receivables for liquidity, combined with the cyclicality of the business, suggests that the company could face stress if a severe downturn coincided with a need to repay debt.
Misapplied Metric: P/E in a Cyclical Downturn
The negative P/E ratio of -8.72 is misleading for a cyclical company at the bottom of the cycle; EV/EBITDA or P/B better capture normalized earnings power.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Kronos is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, which is currently negative due to TTM losses. Using P/E in this context would suggest the company is uninvestable, but it obscures the fact that the company is in a cyclical trough and has historically generated positive earnings. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 65.65 on a TTM basis is elevated, but the forward EV/EBITDA of 10.30 suggests the market expects a significant recovery in EBITDA. Alternatively, price-to-book of 1.28 provides a more stable valuation reference, though it may not fully reflect the cyclicality of the business. Investors should focus on normalized earnings power across the cycle rather than trailing P/E.