Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.6x · EV/EBITDA 9.2x · ROE 30.9%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.7B | $24.3B | $20.0B | $14.9B | $14.5B | $12.7B | $15.1B | $14.2B | $8.1B | $9.9B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.4B | $29.0B | $24.4B | $19.4B | $19.5B | $17.7B | $19.9B | $16.8B | $10.9B | $12.7B | $8.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.61 | 16.48 | 15.96 | 75.17 | 21.21 | 16.87 | 24.11 | 21.28 | 13.87 | 27.13 | 21.76 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.94 | 1.41 | 1.20 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.23 | 1.28 | 0.79 | 0.98 | 0.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.54 | 4.90 | 4.49 | 3.51 | 3.33 | 2.93 | 3.91 | 4.15 | 2.44 | 2.94 | 1.69 |
| P/FCF | 8.52 | 14.95 | 16.10 | 15.59 | 16.94 | 13.71 | 13.15 | 16.30 | 11.61 | 22.35 | 12.75 |
| P/OCF | 9.54 | 13.88 | 14.38 | 12.82 | 14.72 | 12.33 | 11.35 | 14.31 | 10.50 | 18.90 | 11.93 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.69 | 1.46 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.28 | 1.62 | 1.52 | 1.07 | 1.25 | 1.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.17 | 12.11 | 11.51 | 20.33 | 13.72 | 11.95 | 15.56 | 14.69 | 10.80 | 14.19 | 15.34 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.16 | 13.78 | 13.30 | 31.48 | 17.96 | 15.34 | 20.69 | 16.62 | 14.39 | 23.47 | 19.97 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.86 | 19.60 | 20.21 | 22.74 | 19.04 | 17.31 | 19.33 | 15.63 | 28.53 | 19.82 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.7% | 17.7% | 16.8% | 14.5% | 14.5% | 14.7% | 14.1% | 14.0% | 14.8% | 12.3% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 12.3% | 11.0% | 4.0% | 7.6% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 8.2% | 7.3% | 5.5% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.5% | 8.5% | 7.5% | 1.3% | 4.8% | 5.5% | 5.1% | 6.0% | 5.7% | 3.6% | 3.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 30.9% | 30.9% | 28.8% | 4.6% | 15.8% | 18.3% | 17.2% | 19.8% | 17.4% | 11.2% | 11.6% |
| ROA | 10.9% | 10.9% | 9.7% | 1.5% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 5.7% | 7.4% | 6.5% | 4.0% | 3.9% |
| ROIC | 17.1% | 17.1% | 15.7% | 5.2% | 8.8% | 9.6% | 10.2% | 11.2% | 9.2% | 6.9% | 8.2% |
| ROCE | 21.0% | 21.0% | 19.1% | 6.6% | 11.4% | 11.7% | 12.0% | 13.3% | 11.1% | 8.0% | 8.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 1.30 | 1.37 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.50 | 5.46 | 3.86 | 3.84 | 4.15 | 2.89 | 3.11 | 3.51 | 6.17 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.24 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.94 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.97 | 1.97 | 2.05 | 4.64 | 3.50 | 3.34 | 3.74 | 2.31 | 2.78 | 3.08 | 5.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.91 | 3.50 | 4.61 | 5.80 | 5.33 | 4.16 | 3.04 | 4.02 | 6.19 | 7.07 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.38 | 10.38 | 9.49 | 2.90 | 5.45 | 6.26 | 5.29 | 6.89 | 5.21 | 3.66 | 4.31 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.21 | 1.34 | 0.92 | 1.12 | 1.15 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 1.21 | 1.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.13 | 1.24 | 0.85 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.38 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.22 | 1.10 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 0.77 |
| Inventory Turnover | 41.35 | 41.35 | 44.01 | 42.56 | 42.90 | 42.78 | 38.26 | 132.58 | — | 117.41 | 92.40 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 57.55 | 57.94 | 57.43 | 59.58 | 58.16 | 63.43 | 57.05 | 67.21 | 65.71 | 86.44 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 21.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 14.5% | 14.5% | 16.6% | 101.0% | 29.1% | 26.4% | 31.2% | 29.7% | 34.1% | 54.1% | 465.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.6% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 7.2% | 3.7% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 11.7% | 6.7% | 6.2% | 6.4% | 5.9% | 7.3% | 7.6% | 6.1% | 8.6% | 4.5% | 7.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.7% | 3.9% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 3.7% | 2.1% | 0.7% | 3.2% | 5.4% | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.9% | 4.8% | 5.6% | 3.0% | 5.1% | 3.7% | 2.0% | 4.6% | 7.9% | 2.3% | 21.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $132M | $136M | $138M | $138M | $143M | $144M | $145M | $153M | $154M | $104M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LDOS stock.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.6x. The historical average is 21.2x. This places it at the 16th percentile of its historical range.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.3x.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 30.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 16.8%.
Based on historical data, Leidos Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.6x. This is at the 16th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.20% with a payout ratio of 14.5%.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. has 17.7% gross margin and 12.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Federal budget and contract timing
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Multiples Price Leidos Below Peers
Based on reported figures, Leidos trades at 12.20x trailing P/E and 9.06x EV/EBITDA, below CACI's 25.02x and 15.80x, suggesting the market applies a discount reflecting its slower organic growth and lower return profile.
The 0.59 PEG ratio implies the market is pricing in earnings growth well above what the 3.1% organic revenue trend would normally support, which may indicate either mispricing or expectations of margin expansion from recent contract wins. Relative to its own history, the multiple compression across the recent quarters appears consistent with investors discounting federal budget exposure. Investors should monitor whether forward multiples remain compressed if booking momentum fails to convert into revenue.
ROIC Recovering From Compressed Levels
As reported in financial statements, Leidos's ROIC moved from 4.6% in 2025Q2 to 3.7% in 2026Q3, while ROE held near 7.8%, indicating returns on invested capital have softened even as equity-level returns improved.
The gap between ROE and ROIC is largely a function of the $7.7B goodwill base, which dilutes capital efficiency relative to the equity base and suggests acquisitions have not yet generated returns exceeding the cost of capital at the invested level. The recent ROE uptick therefore appears driven more by leverage and buybacks than by improved operating economics. Sustained ROIC above 5% would be needed to confirm genuine compounding.
Debt Service Comfortable but Headroom Narrowing
According to recent SEC filings, Leidos's interest coverage of 8.19x in 2026Q3 is down from 11.20x in 2024Q3, while debt-to-EBITDA rose to 10.55x, suggesting debt service remains serviceable but less comfortable than two years ago.
The debt-to-EBITDA ratio above 10x is high by industrial standards, though interest coverage remains adequate, which implies the cost of debt is manageable while principal reduction capacity is constrained. The 1.26 debt-to-equity figure leaves limited room for further leveraged acquisitions without pressuring refinancing flexibility. Investors should watch whether coverage continues to decline as the company funds acquisitions and buybacks simultaneously.
Liquidity Supported by Receivables Not Cash
Based on Leidos's reported figures, the 1.60 current ratio and 1.57 quick ratio in 2026Q3 appear adequate, though cash fell to $630M from $1.2B in 2025Q4, indicating reliance on working capital conversion rather than reserves.
The narrow gap between current and quick ratios suggests limited inventory dependence, which is consistent with a services model, but the quick ratio still depends heavily on receivables collection timing. Under a stressed scenario where government payments slip, the thin cash buffer could constrain buyback or acquisition activity. This warrants further investigation into the receivables aging profile.
EV/EBITDA Overstates Earnings Power
The most commonly misapplied metric here is EV/EBITDA, which can flatter Leidos because intangible amortization from the IS&GS and Dynetics deals is excluded while the cash cost of acquisitions is not.
Given goodwill representing roughly half of total assets, EBITDA excludes amortization that reflects real economic consumption of acquired contracts and talent, potentially making the 9.06x multiple look cheaper than it is on a free cash flow basis. Price-to-free-cash-flow of 10.51x may be a more conservative anchor, though quarterly cash flow volatility limits its reliability on any single period. Investors should weigh multiple cash-based measures together rather than relying on EBITDA alone.