Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 38.8x · EV/EBITDA 35.4x · ROE 16.8%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.9B | $4.8B | $1.1B | $843M | $487M | $693M | $234M | $66M | $15M | $36M | $58M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.1B | $4.1B | $936M | $819M | $477M | $633M | $199M | $58M | $45M | $-8785190 | $31M |
| P/E Ratio → | 38.80 | 62.25 | 14.90 | 10.00 | 9.61 | 5.12 | 40.58 | — | — | 6.91 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 6.39 | 10.78 | 2.47 | 2.63 | 1.66 | 2.32 | 0.95 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.94 | 6.32 | 6.76 | 26.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 91.63 | 154.54 | 33.15 | 112.45 | 24.46 | 14.19 | 3.56 | 5.88 | — | — | 1.67 |
| P/OCF | 56.23 | 94.84 | 29.48 | 92.68 | 23.63 | 13.85 | 3.49 | 5.82 | — | — | 1.54 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.13 | 2.12 | 2.56 | 1.62 | 2.12 | 0.80 | 0.28 | 0.24 | -0.04 | 0.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.37 | 68.14 | 15.93 | 13.77 | 6.88 | 8.23 | 3.41 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 42.35 | 40.99 | 12.37 | 9.55 | 6.98 | 4.66 | 3.74 | — | — | -0.50 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 130.83 | 28.46 | 109.24 | 23.96 | 12.97 | 3.02 | 5.16 | — | — | 0.91 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.2% | 26.2% | 25.2% | 35.0% | 40.1% | 38.4% | 39.5% | 15.5% | -9.3% | 26.0% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 10.9% | 16.4% | 20.3% | 22.9% | 20.6% | -9.4% | -47.9% | -8.0% | -19.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.3% | 17.3% | 16.6% | 26.4% | 17.8% | 58.7% | 22.0% | -7.9% | -53.9% | 5.6% | -21.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 75.6% | 261.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 4.4% | 4.4% | 7.7% | 11.2% | 8.2% | 33.1% | 11.5% | -3.2% | -16.7% | 1.8% | -8.7% |
| ROIC | 248.5% | 248.5% | 467.5% | 479.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 3.6% | 3.6% | 8.9% | 18.0% | 27.4% | 45.6% | 42.6% | -15.6% | -45.6% | -5.3% | -14.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.59 | 1.59 | 3.39 | 5.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 20.22 | 20.22 | 9.31 | 2.98 | 2.45 | 1.75 | 2.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.97 | -0.96 | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -12.35 | -12.35 | -2.62 | -0.41 | -0.15 | -0.78 | -0.61 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -23.71 | -4.69 | -3.21 | -0.51 | -1.22 | -0.54 | -0.71 | — | — | -0.77 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.14 | 7.14 | 28.04 | 66.00 | 136.60 | 1360.00 | 531.00 | -4.40 | -24.39 | 3.28 | -2.43 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.0B) exceeds total debt ($1.2B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.59 | 5.59 | 2.74 | 1.45 | 1.31 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.41 | 1.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.83 | 4.83 | 2.28 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.63 | 4.63 | 2.02 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 0.80 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.44 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.03 | 1.03 | 2.05 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 2.02 | 2.31 | 2.75 | 1.63 | 1.06 | 1.50 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 24.97 | 66.06 | 56.31 | 47.33 | 35.61 | 43.71 | 36.73 | 113.85 | 100.61 | 23.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.6% | 1.6% | 6.7% | 10.0% | 10.4% | 19.5% | 2.5% | — | — | 14.5% | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.1% | 0.6% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 4.1% | 7.0% | 28.1% | 17.0% | — | — | 59.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $16M | $16M | $15M | $14M | $10M | $10M | $9M | $9M | $9M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LEU stock.
Centrus Energy Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 38.8x. The historical average is 27.6x. This places it at the 71th percentile of its historical range.
Centrus Energy Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 35.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
Centrus Energy Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 16.8%. The historical average is 21.6%.
Based on historical data, Centrus Energy Corp. is trading at a P/E of 38.8x. This is at the 71th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Centrus Energy Corp. has 26.2% gross margin and 11.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Centrus Energy Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 20.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Lumpy deliveries and capex spike
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for HALEU Optionality
LEU trades at 48.5x trailing earnings and 47.3x EV/EBITDA, far above peers, reflecting market pricing for HALEU growth. According to quarterly data, forward multiples compress to 73.9x P/E and 20.9x EV/EBITDA, implying expectations of significant margin expansion.
The current P/E of 48.5 and EV/EBITDA of 47.3 are steep relative to the peer group, where most companies are loss-making and trade on asset value. The forward EV/EBITDA of 20.9 suggests the market is pricing in a substantial EBITDA increase, likely tied to the HALEU production ramp. However, the PEG of 1.03 indicates that the growth rate implied by the forward multiple is roughly in line with the earnings growth forecast, but given the lumpy revenue history, investors should question the reliability of that growth estimate.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Earning Power
Gross margin swung from -5.7% in 2025Q3 to 45.0% in 2025Q1, while net margin ranged from -14.0% to 37.2% over ten quarters. As reported in financial statements, these swings reflect contract timing and inventory effects, obscuring the company's true earning power.
The extreme variability in margins—gross margin from -5.7% to 45.0% and operating margin from -22.2% to 28.0%—indicates that quarterly profitability is heavily influenced by the timing of deliveries and cost recognition. The 2026Q2 net margin of 9.5% on an operating margin of 5.9% suggests non-operating gains or tax benefits, as noted in prior analysis. Investors should focus on normalized margins over a full cycle, which appear to be in the mid-teens to low-twenties, rather than any single quarter's figure.
ROIC Spikes Reflect Timing, Not Sustainable Returns
ROIC ranged from -15.4% in 2024Q3 to 195.4% in 2024Q2, with 2026Q2 at 6.5%. Based on reported figures, these swings are driven by lumpy revenue and a rapidly expanding capital base, making the metric unreliable for trend analysis.
The ROIC figures are highly volatile, with a 195.4% peak in 2024Q2 and a -15.4% trough in 2024Q3, reflecting the lumpy nature of uranium deliveries and the timing of investments. The recent 6.5% ROIC in 2026Q2 is more indicative of the current capital intensity, as the company invests heavily in HALEU production. Over the long term, the company's ability to generate returns above its cost of capital will depend on the successful commercialization of HALEU, which is not yet reflected in the data.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency Metrics
Cash conversion cycle averaged over 300 days in the last ten quarters, with DIO spiking to 631 days in 2026Q1. According to quarterly filings, asset turnover fell to 0.07 in 2026Q2, reflecting a massive cash build and inventory accumulation.
The cash conversion cycle has been extremely volatile, ranging from 131 days in 2024Q2 to 692 days in 2025Q1, driven by swings in DIO (inventory days) which reached 631 days in 2026Q1. This suggests that inventory is being accumulated, possibly for future HALEU production, but it also ties up significant capital. Asset turnover has declined to 0.07 in 2026Q2, as the balance sheet has expanded with cash and PP&E, indicating that the company is becoming more asset-heavy, which may pressure returns if revenue does not scale accordingly.
Debt Load Eases but Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity fell from 3.34 in 2025Q3 to 1.39 in 2026Q2, while interest coverage improved to 6.14. As reported in financial statements, the debt reduction is positive, but the elevated D/EBITDA of 88.5 in 2026Q2 signals that EBITDA is still too low to comfortably service debt.
The leverage metrics have improved significantly from the 2025Q3 peak, with D/E dropping to 1.39 and interest coverage rising to 6.14 in 2026Q2. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 88.5 in 2026Q2 is extremely high, indicating that EBITDA is depressed relative to the debt load, likely due to the lumpy revenue and heavy investment phase. The company's ability to service its debt will depend on generating consistent EBITDA from HALEU sales, which is not yet evident in the data.
Cash Buffer Provides Cushion Amidst Negative FCF
Current ratio improved to 5.39 in 2026Q2, with cash at $1.9B, according to quarterly filings. Despite negative free cash flow of -$111.5M in 2026Q2, the liquidity position appears robust, but the reliance on inventory and receivables could be a concern.
The current ratio of 5.39 and quick ratio of 4.52 in 2026Q2 indicate a strong liquidity position, largely due to the $1.9B cash balance. However, the negative free cash flow of -$111.5M in 2026Q2, driven by heavy capex and working capital outflows, suggests that the cash pile may be drawn down if the investment phase continues. The high inventory levels (DIO of 257 days) could become a liquidity risk if uranium prices decline or if the inventory becomes obsolete, but the current cash buffer provides a significant cushion.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Lumpy Earnings
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to Centrus because earnings are highly volatile due to lumpy deliveries and one-time items. According to quarterly data, net income swung from -$14.0M to $37.2% margins, making trailing P/E misleading.
The P/E ratio is not a reliable valuation metric for Centrus because its earnings are subject to extreme quarterly swings, as seen in the net margin range of -14.0% to 37.2%. A single quarter's earnings can distort the P/E, as evidenced by the trailing P/E of 48.5 versus a forward P/E of 73.9, which implies a decline in earnings. Instead, investors should use EV/EBITDA on a normalized basis, or a sum-of-the-parts valuation that separates the LEU segment from the HALEU growth option, to better capture the company's intrinsic value.