Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 37.1x · EV/EBITDA 18.5x · ROE 10.6%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $764M | $755M | $489M | $307M | $150M | $187M | $161M | $66M | $78M | $48M | $45M |
| Enterprise Value | $939M | $930M | $607M | $347M | $204M | $202M | $201M | $132M | $109M | $86M | $66M |
| P/E Ratio → | 37.06 | 37.15 | 49.44 | 11.81 | 16.08 | 7.18 | 4.36 | 34.48 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.47 | 1.46 | 1.11 | 0.81 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.77 | 3.78 | 2.74 | 1.84 | 1.03 | 1.32 | 1.56 | 1.20 | 1.96 | 1.05 | 0.62 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 9.41 | 8.98 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 12.91 | 12.75 | 16.68 | 12.00 | 169.89 | 6.83 | 6.85 | 67.10 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.80 | 1.38 | 0.92 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.52 | 18.34 | 22.90 | 8.66 | 9.03 | 3.58 | 9.07 | 9.87 | 24.48 | 21.66 | 11.17 |
| EV / EBIT | 31.41 | 31.52 | 35.13 | 9.65 | 12.32 | 2462.63 | 13.69 | 25.13 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 10.14 | 11.24 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 60.4% | 58.7% | 57.1% | 57.3% | 58.6% | 58.3% | 54.8% | 52.4% | 50.6% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 5.8% | 3.4% | 8.8% | 4.7% | 14.7% | 5.0% | 1.9% | -1.5% | -1.8% | -2.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.2% | 6.9% | 3.6% | 10.4% | 16.6% | 0.7% | -2.5% | -4.4% | -14.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.6% | 10.6% | 5.7% | 16.7% | 8.8% | 28.4% | 61.4% | 4.2% | -15.3% | -19.4% | -36.9% |
| ROA | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.5% | 8.2% | 4.3% | 12.8% | 22.1% | 1.2% | -4.3% | -7.2% | -15.2% |
| ROIC | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 12.3% | 6.9% | 24.7% | 8.4% | 4.1% | -3.8% | -4.0% | -4.0% |
| ROCE | 8.1% | 8.1% | 4.9% | 13.1% | 7.0% | 24.2% | 9.4% | 4.8% | -4.2% | -4.7% | -4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.62 | 1.22 | 1.15 | 0.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.02 | 4.02 | 6.70 | 2.91 | 4.44 | 1.74 | 3.54 | 6.68 | 10.92 | 13.19 | 7.11 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 1.19 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.46 | 3.46 | 4.46 | 1.02 | 2.41 | 0.26 | 1.82 | 4.91 | 6.98 | 9.54 | 3.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 0.73 | 2.26 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 8.70 | 8.70 | 6.74 | 103.71 | 103.72 | 0.04 | 11.53 | 1.77 | -1.62 | -0.66 | -3.58 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.23 | 1.83 | 2.07 | 1.85 | 1.11 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.20 | 1.79 | 2.03 | 1.80 | 1.07 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 1.04 | 1.11 | 1.26 | 0.57 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.05 | 1.01 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 1.80 | 1.69 | 1.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 51.53 | 51.53 | 59.53 | 55.05 | 56.82 | 51.06 | 51.04 | 76.80 | 86.40 | 78.10 | 89.72 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.97 | 35.65 | 34.46 | 38.96 | 28.47 | 37.39 | 27.58 | 25.90 | 22.01 | 28.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 8.5% | 6.2% | 13.9% | 22.9% | 2.9% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 10.6% | 11.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 6.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 7.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $31M | $31M | $26M | $25M | $25M | $25M | $24M | $24M | $23M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LINC stock.
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's current P/E ratio is 37.1x. The historical average is 20.9x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 18.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.2x.
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.6%. The historical average is 4.5%.
Based on historical data, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation is trading at a P/E of 37.1x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation has 60.4% gross margin and 5.8% operating margin.
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory and enrollment concentration risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Leverage
LINC's gross margin expanded to 59.4% in 2026Q1 from 55.7% in 2024Q2, yet operating margin swung from 12.5% in 2025Q4 to 2.3% in 2026Q2, indicating uneven cost control.
The 370 basis point gross margin improvement suggests operating leverage is present as revenue scales, but the dramatic operating margin collapse in 2026Q2—down 10.2 percentage points from the prior quarter—implies that SG&A spending, which consumed 55.8% of revenue, is not being managed consistently. This volatility suggests that the company's true earning power is better reflected in the 2025Q4 peak, where operating leverage was fully realized, rather than the most recent quarter. Investors should monitor whether the 2026Q2 margin compression is a seasonal anomaly or a sign of structural cost escalation.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC peaked at 3.6% in 2025Q4 but fell to 0.6% in 2026Q2, while ROE similarly declined from 6.6% to 1.0%, indicating that capital deployment is not yet generating meaningful returns.
Despite a 21.4% year-over-year increase in total assets, driven by heavy PPE investment, ROIC has not improved proportionally, suggesting that the expanded asset base is not yet producing commensurate profits. The low returns, even at the peak, are well below the cost of capital, implying that the company is in a reinvestment phase where returns are expected to materialize over time. The recent leverage increase to fund expansion may amplify returns if enrollment growth persists, but the current data suggests that capital efficiency is still a work in progress.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Seasonal Swings
CCC improved to -11 days in 2025Q4 from 9 days in 2024Q2, but DSO rose to 41 days in 2026Q2, indicating that cash collection is slowing as enrollment accelerates.
The negative cash conversion cycle in recent quarters indicates that LINC is collecting cash from students before paying suppliers, a favorable position that provides free financing. However, the DSO increase to 41 days in 2026Q2 from 36 days in 2025Q4 suggests that receivables are growing faster than revenue, which may reflect a higher proportion of students using third-party financing or delayed payments. The extreme swings in working capital, as evidenced by the $45 million reversal in working capital changes between 2026Q1 and 2026Q2, highlight the seasonality of enrollment and the need for careful liquidity management.
Leverage Rises to Fund Expansion
Debt-to-equity climbed to 1.13 in 2026Q2 from 1.02 in 2025Q4, while interest coverage fell to 3.13 from 18.91, indicating that debt service is becoming less comfortable as borrowing increases.
The 28.4% year-over-year increase in total debt to $228.1 million is funding aggressive campus expansion, but the sharp decline in interest coverage from 18.91 in 2025Q4 to 3.13 in 2026Q2 suggests that operating income is not keeping pace with interest expense. This deterioration is partly due to the seasonal drop in profitability, but it also reflects the higher debt load. While the absolute debt level remains manageable, the trend warrants monitoring, especially if regulatory changes or enrollment softness pressure cash flows.
Liquidity Tightens as Current Ratio Dips Below 1
Current ratio fell to 0.96 in 2026Q2 from 1.23 in 2024Q4, and cash declined to $44.2 million, indicating that LINC now has less than one dollar of current assets for every dollar of current liabilities.
The deterioration in the current ratio, coupled with a 25% drop in cash, suggests that LINC's liquidity buffer is thinning as it invests heavily in fixed assets and funds working capital needs. The quick ratio of 0.92 in 2026Q2 indicates that even excluding inventory, the company cannot cover its short-term obligations with liquid assets alone. This tight liquidity position could be vulnerable to a sudden enrollment decline or a regulatory shock that disrupts cash collections, though the company's access to debt markets may provide a backstop.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Volatile Earnings
LINC's trailing P/E of 47.34 is misleading given the extreme quarterly earnings volatility, as net margin swung from 8.9% in 2025Q4 to 1.4% in 2026Q2, making forward earnings estimates unreliable.
The market commonly uses P/E to value LINC, but the company's earnings are highly seasonal and subject to significant swings due to marketing timing and enrollment cycles. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 22.69 is still elevated but better captures the company's operating performance before non-cash charges and capital structure effects. Additionally, investors should consider the company's cash flow generation, as cumulative operating cash flow of $109.7 million over the last ten quarters exceeds net income by $73 million, suggesting that earnings understate the company's cash-generating ability. Using a normalized earnings figure or a cash-flow-based multiple would provide a more stable valuation framework.