Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -67.2%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9M | $6M | $13M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $12M | $10M | $14M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.61 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.92 | 0.82 | 1.39 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.41 | 0.66 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 13.3% | 11.6% | 14.3% | 16.5% | 20.7% | 16.0% |
| Operating Margin | -17.5% | -17.5% | -9.2% | 5.3% | 8.3% | 15.8% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -23.6% | -23.6% | -3.8% | 6.3% | 5.9% | 11.7% | 6.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -67.2% | -67.2% | -10.7% | 15.6% | 19.4% | 52.0% | 31.8% |
| ROA | -24.6% | -24.6% | -3.7% | 5.3% | 7.6% | 18.5% | 8.7% |
| ROIC | -28.7% | -28.7% | -16.0% | 7.4% | 16.2% | 47.0% | 34.0% |
| ROCE | -45.7% | -45.7% | -23.6% | 13.9% | 34.4% | 86.0% | 45.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 1.60 | 1.14 | 0.59 | 0.09 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.55 | 0.11 | 0.34 | 0.08 | -0.08 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 1.30 | 0.26 | -0.15 | 0.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -0.52 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.09 | -2.09 | -36292.70 | 178.32 | 92.69 | 176.95 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.52 | 1.21 | 1.14 | 1.03 | 1.28 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.13 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 1.08 | 1.25 | 1.41 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.18 | 2.31 | 4.00 | 5.63 | 3.36 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 56.89 | 25.96 | 59.73 | 131.11 | 37.72 | 12.35 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $9M | $7M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $8M |
Imminent liquidity exhaustion risk
Based on current market data, LOBO trades at a P/S ratio of 0.37, which appears to reflect deep investor skepticism regarding the company's ability to achieve profitability, especially when compared to the broader automotive manufacturing sector where growth-stage firms typically command significantly higher valuation multiples than this.
The negative P/E ratio of -1.19 confirms that the market is currently pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented technology play. Investors should monitor whether this valuation floor holds as the company's cash reserves continue to dwindle toward critical levels.
As reported in recent financial statements, LOBO's ROIC has plummeted to -20.3% in 2025Q4, a stark reversal from the 23.3% peak observed in 2021Q4, suggesting that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its recent investments in software and hardware manufacturing.
The decay in returns on invested capital appears driven by the inability to scale gross margins alongside rising R&D expenditures. This trend suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy has failed to generate the necessary returns to justify its ongoing operational burn rate.
According to the latest quarterly filings, LOBO's cash conversion cycle has extended to 102 days in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is struggling to manage its inventory and receivables effectively compared to its historical performance, which further exacerbates the existing pressure on its limited cash reserves.
The increase in days inventory outstanding to 92 days suggests a potential buildup of unsold hardware, which may necessitate future write-downs. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a primary contributor to the company's persistent inability to generate positive free cash flow.
Based on the 2025Q4 balance sheet, LOBO maintains a quick ratio of 0.63, which, when combined with a cash balance of only $908,341, suggests that the company lacks the necessary liquidity to sustain its current operational burn rate without seeking immediate external financing or dilutive capital.
The reliance on current assets to cover short-term obligations appears increasingly precarious given the company's history of negative operating margins. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional funding, as the current liquidity position may be insufficient to support ongoing manufacturing and development activities.
The most commonly misapplied metric for LOBO is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which obscures the company's underlying lack of profitability and high cash burn, leading investors to potentially overvalue the firm based on top-line growth that fails to translate into sustainable cash generation or long-term shareholder value.
Instead of relying on P/S, analysts should prioritize the cash burn rate and the cash-to-revenue ratio to assess the company's survival probability. The software-royalty narrative often leads to the misapplication of tech-sector multiples, which are inappropriate for a business with 13% gross margins and significant hardware-related capital intensity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LOBO stock.
Lobo EV Technologies Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -1.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Lobo EV Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -67.2%. The historical average is 6.8%.
Based on historical data, Lobo EV Technologies Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -1.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lobo EV Technologies Ltd. has 13.3% gross margin and -17.5% operating margin.