Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.1x · EV/EBITDA 5.0x · ROE 21.7%. (2005–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.2B | $4.1B | $7.0B | $3.1B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $665M | $708M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.0B | $3.9B | $6.8B | $3.1B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $987M | $460M | $499M |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.06 | 12.08 | 24.40 | 15.03 | 12.54 | 16.19 | 18.79 | 45.40 | 33.42 | 24.07 | 1792.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.26 | 1.62 | 2.92 | 1.50 | 0.87 | 1.03 | 0.88 | 1.06 | 1.23 | 0.72 | 0.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.17 | 2.50 | 4.75 | 2.61 | 1.68 | 2.13 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.97 | 1.13 | 1.23 |
| P/FCF | 7.54 | 11.50 | 18.85 | 14.13 | 11.65 | 12.43 | 16.43 | 31.27 | 13.36 | 10.69 | 17.48 |
| P/OCF | 7.35 | 9.41 | 16.24 | 11.01 | 7.83 | 8.37 | 10.03 | 13.77 | 8.79 | 6.31 | 7.98 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.54 | 2.83 | 1.52 | 0.94 | 1.13 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 0.50 | 0.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.98 | 6.71 | 14.32 | 8.62 | 6.25 | 7.49 | 7.11 | 10.81 | 8.44 | 4.56 | 5.71 |
| EV / EBIT | 6.61 | 8.55 | 17.26 | 11.20 | 9.53 | 12.28 | 12.58 | 34.83 | 21.69 | 18.01 | 38.00 |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.91 | 18.23 | 14.26 | 12.62 | 13.70 | 17.41 | 31.92 | 10.59 | 7.39 | 12.32 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 37.8% | 39.2% | 37.4% | 35.2% | 35.4% | 34.8% | 33.4% | 34.7% | 35.4% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 17.9% | 15.0% | 12.2% | 9.0% | 9.3% | 7.2% | 3.1% | 4.5% | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | 12.0% | 10.0% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 3.7% | 3.0% | 0.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.7% | 21.7% | 21.7% | 19.2% | 14.4% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 3.7% | 6.1% | 4.8% | 0.1% |
| ROA | 14.3% | 14.3% | 13.7% | 11.1% | 7.5% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 2.6% | 4.8% | 3.7% | 0.1% |
| ROIC | 25.3% | 25.3% | 22.0% | 16.4% | 12.0% | 12.5% | 10.5% | 4.5% | 9.0% | 5.1% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | 21.8% | 21.8% | 19.6% | 16.0% | 11.9% | 12.0% | 10.7% | 4.4% | 7.1% | 4.1% | 2.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.16 | 1.47 | 1.97 | 2.22 | 2.33 | 2.25 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | -0.16 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.03 | -0.41 | -0.35 | -0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.36 | -0.36 | -0.49 | 0.08 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.40 | 0.22 | -2.21 | -2.03 | -2.39 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.59 | -0.62 | 0.13 | 0.97 | 1.27 | 0.98 | 0.65 | -2.77 | -3.30 | -5.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 38.46 | 38.46 | 37.48 | 31.38 | 21.53 | 18.77 | 6.30 | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($755M) exceeds total debt ($546M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.94 | 5.94 | 5.39 | 5.10 | 3.45 | 3.15 | 2.80 | 1.83 | 3.40 | 3.91 | 4.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.81 | 5.81 | 5.27 | 4.95 | 3.33 | 3.03 | 2.67 | 1.73 | 3.21 | 3.68 | 3.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.32 | 3.32 | 3.25 | 2.83 | 1.69 | 1.29 | 1.26 | 0.78 | 1.82 | 1.99 | 1.96 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.03 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 40.98 | 40.98 | 38.90 | 34.74 | 32.42 | 30.28 | 25.24 | 24.50 | 22.15 | 22.86 | 18.27 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 96.36 | 84.92 | 84.58 | 92.12 | 90.58 | 87.71 | 82.81 | 68.86 | 70.13 | 78.96 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.9% | 8.3% | 4.1% | 6.7% | 8.0% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 2.2% | 3.0% | 4.2% | 0.1% |
| FCF Yield | 13.3% | 8.7% | 5.3% | 7.1% | 8.6% | 8.0% | 6.1% | 3.2% | 7.5% | 9.4% | 5.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.9% | 4.6% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 4.1% | 0.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.9% | 4.6% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 4.1% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $47M | $48M | $44M | $43M | $42M | $42M | $41M | $41M | $41M | $40M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LRN stock.
Stride, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 10.1x. The historical average is 34.8x.
Stride, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.9x.
Stride, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 21.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 8.1%.
Based on historical data, Stride, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 10.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Stride, Inc. has 37.8% gross margin and 17.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Stride, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression amid growth deceleration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Discount to Education Peers
Stride trades at a 10.98x trailing P/E and 5.42x EV/EBITDA, materially below the 13.5–21.1x P/E and 8.5–15.7x EV/EBITDA range of listed education peers, while its 0.33 PEG ratio implies the market is pricing in far slower growth than recent trends suggest.
The valuation gap is striking: Stride's EV/EBITDA of 5.42x represents a roughly 40–60% discount to every peer in the comparable set, from Perdoceo at 8.52x to Graham Holdings at 15.70x. However, the 0.33 PEG ratio may be flattered by a TTM earnings base that has not yet fully reflected the recent $0.46 EPS miss and absent forward guidance. Investors should consider whether the discount reflects a rational repricing of growth durability or an overcorrection that assumes structural rather than cyclical margin compression.
Margins Retreating from Cyclical Peak
Operating margins have compressed from a cyclical peak of 23.3% in 2026Q2 to 13.2% in 2027Q1, with gross margins retreating from 41.1% to 37.7% over the same span, suggesting cost pressures or unfavorable enrollment mix shifts are eroding Stride's underlying earning power.
The gross margin trajectory is the most concerning signal: after peaking at 41.1% in 2026Q2, every subsequent quarter has deteriorated or partially recovered without reclaiming the high-water mark, indicating that the COGS inflation or mix shift may be persistent rather than one-off. Net margins similarly fell from 15.8% at the 2026Q2 peak to 10.2% in 2027Q1, a decline that outpaces the gross margin compression and points to operating deleverage on top of cost-of-goods pressure. The pronounced Q1 SG&A seasonality noted in prior analysis amplifies this pattern, but the fact that 2027Q1 operating margin of 13.2% still exceeds the 8.6% of 2025Q1 and 11.1% of 2026Q1 suggests the baseline earning power has improved even as recent quarters disappoint relative to peak.
ROIC Lagging Well Behind Peers
Stride's ROIC declined from 7.0% in 2025Q3 to 4.0% in 2027Q1, placing it substantially below peer returns such as Perdoceo's 15.3% and Grand Canyon's 32.4%, indicating that capital deployment is generating comparatively weaker incremental returns.
A 4.0% ROIC against a weighted average cost of capital likely in the 8–10% range suggests Stride may not currently be creating economic value on invested capital, a conclusion that contrasts sharply with peer economics. The erosion from the 7.0% peak appears driven by both margin compression and a declining asset turnover ratio of 0.26, meaning returns are being squeezed from the profitability and efficiency sides simultaneously. Investors should monitor whether the new capex ramp — $78.3M in 2026Q4 and $24.5M in 2027Q1 — eventually lifts asset turnover enough to reverse this trend, or whether the heavier asset base further dilutes returns in the near term.
Conservative Balance Sheet Insulates Downside
Stride's debt-to-equity ratio compressed from 0.46 to 0.37 over ten quarters while interest coverage stands at 29.51x, levels well inside peer leverage norms and suggesting the balance sheet provides substantial insulation from refinancing or covenant stress.
The deleveraging appears driven primarily by equity accretion from retained earnings — which grew from $558.5M to $1.2B — rather than absolute debt reduction, since total debt actually rose modestly within its $528–619M band. With D/E of 0.37 comparing favorably to Laureate at 0.71 and Adtalem at 0.54, Stride carries meaningfully less balance sheet risk than several capital-intensive education peers. However, given the documented capex ramp and absence of forward guidance, investors should assess whether management intends to deploy this low leverage capacity for acquisitions or organic investment, as either path could alter the current conservative profile.
Working Capital Cycle Is Lengthening
Asset turnover has drifted lower from 0.29 to 0.26 over the trailing ten quarters while the cash conversion cycle stretched from 85 to 102 days, indicating working capital is being deployed less efficiently as receivables collection lengthens relative to supplier payment terms.
The DSO expansion from 89 days in 2024Q4 to 109 days in 2027Q1 is the primary driver of the longer CCC, suggesting that state funding disbursements are arriving more slowly or that billing timing has shifted — a pattern that warrants further investigation into the causes behind slower collection cycles. Meanwhile, DPO has remained relatively stable at 9–14 days, meaning Stride is not extracting additional supplier financing to offset the receivables drag. The combination of declining asset turnover and a lengthening cash conversion cycle may partially explain why the company's operating cash conversion has become more volatile, with quarterly OCF/NI ratios swinging from -3.47 to +5.81.
P/E Misleads Amid Extreme Seasonality
Stride's trailing P/E of 10.98x is the ratio most commonly misapplied to this enrollment-driven education model, because academic-calendar seasonality distorts quarterly earnings and makes any snapshot multiple unreliable for comparing Stride against peers with differing fiscal periods and cost structures.
The seasonality problem is concrete: Stride's operating margins range from 8.6% in Q1 troughs to 23.3% in Q2 peaks, meaning a P/E computed on any single quarter's annualized earnings would either dramatically overstate or understate the business's normalized earning power. What the trailing P/E obscures is the trajectory — with 2027Q1 EPS missing consensus by $0.46 and no forward guidance provided, the 10.98x multiple may reflect a stale earnings base rather than a genuine valuation floor. Analysts should instead anchor on a full-cycle EV/EBITDA or mid-cycle P/E that smooths academic-year fluctuations, while cross-referencing against the company's peer-relative ROIC deficit of 4.0% versus the 12.8–32.4% range, to determine whether the discount to peers is justified by structurally weaker returns or merely by cyclical margin timing.