Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -301.0%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $6M | $24M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6M | $8M | $29M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.70 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.25 | 0.36 | 1.31 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.28 | 2.26 | 37.61 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.44 | 1.56 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 16.2% | 20.3% | 19.9% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | -27.9% | -2.9% | -1.9% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -29.5% | -29.5% | -1.2% | 5.8% | -0.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -301.0% | -301.0% | -30.1% | 158.8% | -3.7% |
| ROA | -44.5% | -44.5% | -3.1% | 13.7% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | -78.9% | -78.9% | -8.7% | -4.9% | — |
| ROCE | -123.4% | -123.4% | -17.5% | -9.0% | 4.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.25 | 2.25 | 7.24 | 3.76 | 50.12 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 17.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.50 | 7.05 | 3.56 | 45.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 15.96 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 144.82 | 18.86 |
| Interest Coverage | -12.27 | -12.27 | -1.72 | 9.08 | 0.94 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.62 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.23 | 1.99 | 2.35 | 1.80 |
| Inventory Turnover | 154.47 | 154.47 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 71.32 | 68.08 | 62.64 | 42.92 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $6M | $8M | $8M |
Insolvency and liquidity exhaustion
According to recent market data, LSH trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.25, a valuation level that typically signals deep market skepticism regarding the firm's ability to achieve sustainable profitability or scale its niche logistics operations within the highly competitive trans-Pacific freight forwarding sector.
The negative TTM P/E ratio confirms that the market is currently pricing the company based on its distressed status rather than future earnings potential. Investors should monitor whether this low multiple represents a genuine value opportunity or a reflection of the structural inability of the business model to generate positive returns on invested capital.
As reported in financial statements, LSH's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -8.1% in 2026Q3, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding capital through its specialized middle-mile consolidation services for social commerce platforms.
The persistent negative trend in ROIC suggests that the company's investments in logistics infrastructure and operational overhead are not yielding sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital. This decay warrants further investigation into whether the firm's current asset base is fundamentally misaligned with its revenue-generating capacity.
Based on LSH's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has expanded significantly to 395 days in 2026Q3, a dramatic increase from historical levels that highlights severe friction in the company's ability to collect receivables and manage its operational cash flow effectively.
The ballooning DSO, which reached 903 days in the most recent quarter, suggests that the company is struggling to collect payments from its fragmented customer base, potentially indicating credit quality issues. This inefficiency forces the company to rely on external liquidity to fund its day-to-day operations, increasing the risk of a cash crunch.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, LSH's current ratio of 4.27 in 2026Q3 appears superficially healthy, yet this metric is heavily distorted by the company's inability to convert its ballooning accounts receivable into actual cash, leaving the firm vulnerable to sudden liquidity shocks.
While the current ratio suggests a cushion, the underlying quality of these current assets is highly questionable given the extreme DSO levels. Investors should monitor the company's ability to liquidate these receivables, as any impairment would rapidly erode the firm's remaining liquidity and threaten its ongoing operational viability.
The current ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for LSH, as it obscures the reality that the company's liquidity is tied up in potentially uncollectible receivables rather than cash, thereby masking the true severity of the firm's ongoing cash burn and insolvency risk.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash-to-burn ratio or the quick ratio adjusted for receivable aging to gain a more accurate picture of the firm's survival runway. Relying on standard liquidity ratios in this context provides a false sense of security that ignores the structural failure of the company's collection cycle.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LSH stock.
Lakeside Holding Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Lakeside Holding Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -301.0%. The historical average is -44.0%.
Based on historical data, Lakeside Holding Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lakeside Holding Limited has 16.2% gross margin and -27.9% operating margin.