Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.5x · EV/EBITDA 24.3x · ROE 8.8%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $335M | $281M | $227M | $263M | $166M | $154M | $144M | $170M | $138M | $147M | $82M |
| Enterprise Value | $473M | $428M | $365M | $382M | $192M | $71M | $65M | $153M | $129M | $211M | $128M |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.53 | 14.45 | 14.61 | 15.13 | 10.58 | 8.27 | 17.18 | 13.38 | 11.05 | 15.55 | 12.73 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.09 | 2.50 | 2.09 | 2.71 | 2.69 | 2.59 | 2.46 | 2.86 | 2.55 | 3.01 | 2.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.29 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.28 | 0.84 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 1.23 | 1.07 | 1.22 | 1.07 |
| P/FCF | 20.09 | — | 13.59 | 12.37 | 9.48 | 10.40 | 10.29 | 14.67 | 11.30 | 11.54 | 14.55 |
| P/OCF | 19.20 | — | 12.98 | 11.77 | 9.02 | 9.99 | 9.55 | 12.61 | 9.64 | 10.55 | 10.51 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.81 | 3.36 | 3.93 | 3.11 | 1.19 | 1.11 | 2.58 | 2.38 | 4.31 | 3.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.28 | 18.21 | 18.71 | 17.50 | 10.09 | 2.85 | 5.53 | 8.85 | 7.81 | 13.37 | 13.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.81 | 18.21 | 19.89 | 18.38 | 10.16 | 3.11 | 6.67 | 10.02 | 8.84 | 15.40 | 15.43 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 21.86 | 17.94 | 10.98 | 4.77 | 4.65 | 13.26 | 10.59 | 16.57 | 22.79 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.8% | 65.8% | 60.7% | 71.0% | 92.3% | 91.8% | 67.4% | 76.4% | 80.1% | 84.3% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 20.9% | 16.9% | 21.4% | 30.6% | 38.1% | 16.6% | 25.8% | 27.0% | 28.0% | 24.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.3% | 17.3% | 14.3% | 17.9% | 25.4% | 31.3% | 14.2% | 21.4% | 23.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.8% | 8.8% | 7.5% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 12.9% | 5.9% | 9.6% | 10.0% | 9.6% | 9.2% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 10.7% | 4.7% | 6.0% | 4.9% | 5.4% | 4.7% |
| ROCE | 2.3% | 2.3% | 8.0% | 9.5% | 10.1% | 14.0% | 6.2% | 10.5% | 10.1% | 11.5% | 10.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.39 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.94 | 7.94 | 9.44 | 8.02 | 4.09 | 0.56 | 1.17 | 1.08 | 6.01 | 6.59 | 8.29 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.13 | -0.57 | -0.55 | -0.12 | -0.07 | 0.53 | 0.60 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.24 | 6.24 | 7.08 | 5.43 | 1.39 | -3.36 | -6.71 | -0.95 | -0.53 | 4.05 | 4.94 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 8.27 | 5.57 | 1.51 | -5.63 | -5.64 | -1.42 | -0.72 | 5.02 | 8.23 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 0.83 | 4.00 | 5.41 | 1.05 | 1.16 | 1.47 | 2.06 | 1.99 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 41.6% | 39.5% | 35.0% | 22.8% | 45.9% | 29.0% | 30.4% | 35.5% | 36.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.7% | 6.9% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 9.5% | 12.1% | 5.8% | 7.5% | 9.0% | 6.4% | 7.9% |
| FCF Yield | 5.0% | — | 7.4% | 8.1% | 10.6% | 9.6% | 9.7% | 6.8% | 8.8% | 8.7% | 6.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $8M | $8M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $7M | $6M | $6M | $4M |
CRE concentration and margin compression
Based on reported figures, MBCN trades at a P/B of 1.29, which suggests the market currently prices the bank as a stable, rural-focused franchise rather than a high-growth urban competitor, despite the ongoing strategic expansion into the more competitive Columbus metropolitan area as noted in recent financial disclosures.
The current P/B multiple appears to reflect a premium relative to some peers, likely due to the perceived stickiness of the bank's legacy rural deposit base. However, investors should monitor whether this valuation holds if the bank's return on tangible common equity remains suppressed by the costs associated with its urban expansion strategy.
According to recent quarterly data, MBCN's ROE has remained in a narrow range between 1.1% and 2.9%, indicating that the bank's profitability is currently strained by a combination of compressed net interest margins and volatile non-interest income contributions that obscure core operational earnings power.
The decomposition of ROE suggests that the bank's reliance on a large securities portfolio rather than high-yielding loan growth is limiting asset utilization. The recent volatility in non-interest income further complicates the assessment of core profitability, warranting caution regarding the sustainability of current earnings levels.
As reported in financial statements, the bank's NIM has stagnated at 0.9% through 2025Q4, suggesting that the cost of funding is effectively neutralizing the yield benefits of the bank's asset base, while the efficiency ratio of 46.8% indicates ongoing pressure from administrative overhead and expansion costs.
The inability to expand the NIM despite asset growth implies that the bank's funding advantage may be eroding as market rates remain elevated. Management's ability to control the efficiency ratio will be critical, as any further rise in non-interest expenses could lead to a permanent contraction in operating margins.
Based on reported figures, MBCN maintains a stable equity-to-assets ratio of approximately 11% to 12% across the last ten quarters, providing a robust capital cushion that supports the bank's ongoing geographic expansion into the Columbus market without the immediate need for external equity financing or excessive leverage.
This conservative capital position appears to be a deliberate strategy to mitigate the risks associated with the bank's concentrated CRE portfolio. While this provides a buffer against regional economic volatility, it also suggests that management is prioritizing balance sheet stability over aggressive capital return to shareholders.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to MBCN, as it fails to account for the significant impact of non-recurring provision volatility and purchase accounting accretion, which can artificially distort earnings and obscure the bank's true underlying operational performance and long-term franchise value.
Investors should instead prioritize P/TBV and ROTCE, as these metrics provide a more accurate reflection of the bank's capital efficiency and the intrinsic value of its deposit franchise. Relying on P/E in a period of shifting provision expenses may lead to a flawed assessment of the bank's earnings quality.
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MBCN stock.
Middlefield Banc Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 17.5x. The historical average is 12.4x. This places it at the 96th percentile of its historical range.
Middlefield Banc Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 24.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.6x.
Middlefield Banc Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.8%. The historical average is 10.3%.
Based on historical data, Middlefield Banc Corp. is trading at a P/E of 17.5x. This is at the 96th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Middlefield Banc Corp.'s current dividend yield is 2.37%.
Middlefield Banc Corp. has 65.8% gross margin and 20.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Middlefield Banc Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.