Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -9.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $57M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $59M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -9.13 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1615.87 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.0% | 56.0% | 49.9% | — | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | -16232.0% | -16232.0% | -2084.5% | — | -1026.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -17143.9% | -17143.9% | -2060.1% | — | -1035.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -443.8% | -120.7% |
| ROA | -241.3% | -241.3% | -148.9% | -140.7% | -44.1% |
| ROIC | — | — | -547.3% | -184.4% | — |
| ROCE | — | — | -447.9% | -213.3% | -61.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 2.03 | 1.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 2.02 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -17.48 | -17.48 | -187.79 | -137.49 | -149.20 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 1.65 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 1.65 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.35 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | 0.07 | — | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1037.96 | 159.00 | — | 178.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $34M | $34M | $30M | $34M |
Imminent liquidity insolvency risk
Based on reported figures, MCRP trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1,615.87, a valuation level that appears disconnected from fundamental performance and suggests the market is pricing the firm as a distressed venture rather than a viable, scalable infrastructure software provider within the robotics sector.
The extreme P/S multiple indicates that investors are placing negligible value on current revenue, likely due to the 77% year-over-year decline and the lack of recurring income. This valuation suggests that the market has effectively written off the company's existing project pipeline, viewing the current revenue base as non-representative of future potential.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin has deteriorated to -10.5% in 2024Q4, indicating that the direct costs of hardware and bespoke engineering services are currently exceeding the revenue generated from these municipal contracts, leaving no contribution toward covering the firm's massive fixed operating overhead.
The persistent negative operating margin of -16,231% highlights a fundamental inability to achieve the scale necessary to amortize R&D and administrative costs. This suggests that the current business model is structurally unprofitable, as the cost of delivering customized robotics solutions consistently outpaces the pricing power available in the GCC market.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's days sales outstanding reached 1,257 days in 2024Q4, a figure that underscores severe delays in cash collection and suggests that the firm lacks the leverage to enforce timely payment terms on its large-scale municipal robotics and infrastructure integration projects.
The extreme DSO levels imply that the company is essentially financing its clients' operations, which is unsustainable given the current liquidity crunch. This inefficiency in the cash conversion cycle exacerbates the firm's reliance on external capital, as cash remains trapped in long-duration receivables rather than funding core R&D.
Based on the latest quarterly data, the current ratio has fallen to 0.17, a level that signals an acute inability to meet short-term liabilities and confirms that the company's liquidity position is insufficient to sustain operations without an immediate and substantial infusion of new capital.
With cash reserves dwindling to under $50,000, the company faces a high probability of insolvency if it cannot secure emergency financing. The lack of liquid assets relative to current obligations suggests that the firm is operating on a day-to-day basis, leaving no margin for error in project execution or unexpected costs.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to MCRP, failing to recognize that the company's revenue is derived from non-recurring, bespoke project work rather than a standardized, scalable software product, which renders traditional revenue multiples largely irrelevant for assessing the firm's long-term intrinsic value or operational viability.
Using P/S multiples obscures the reality that each deployment requires significant, non-scalable engineering effort, meaning that revenue growth does not necessarily correlate with improved margins. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the ratio of recurring subscription revenue to total revenue to better gauge the company's transition toward a sustainable business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MCRP stock.
Micropolis AI Robotics's current P/E ratio is -9.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Micropolis AI Robotics is trading at a P/E of -9.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Micropolis AI Robotics has 56.0% gross margin and -16232.0% operating margin.