Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.0x · EV/EBITDA 12.5x · ROE 14.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.6B | $18.1B | $20.9B | $17.4B | $22.7B | $23.4B | $24.8B | $22.6B | $20.0B | $13.1B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.5B | $22.0B | $25.2B | $21.8B | $27.7B | $28.4B | $29.2B | $26.8B | $24.6B | $18.0B | $13.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.98 | 22.97 | 26.54 | 25.59 | 33.33 | 30.95 | 33.09 | 32.21 | 21.42 | 27.48 | 25.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.84 | 2.65 | 3.11 | 2.61 | 3.57 | 3.70 | 4.42 | 4.23 | 3.77 | 2.72 | 2.68 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.19 | 3.14 | 3.93 | 3.42 | 4.83 | 5.28 | 6.28 | 6.55 | 6.28 | 5.11 | 7.23 |
| P/FCF | 16.99 | 24.48 | 32.29 | 17.87 | 58.27 | 42.50 | 30.34 | 29.28 | 30.66 | 20.74 | 23.48 |
| P/OCF | 13.07 | 18.84 | 22.66 | 14.06 | 34.84 | 28.23 | 23.78 | 23.91 | 24.34 | 16.10 | 17.99 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.22 | 3.75 | 3.28 | 4.36 | 4.50 | 5.22 | 5.01 | 4.64 | 3.72 | 2.99 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.46 | 16.65 | 19.87 | 18.78 | 26.02 | 23.66 | 25.11 | 24.01 | 23.60 | 21.78 | 17.57 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.09 | 19.86 | 22.76 | 21.67 | 28.79 | 27.53 | 28.75 | 27.23 | 26.85 | 26.02 | 20.41 |
| EV / FCF | — | 29.75 | 38.97 | 22.42 | 71.09 | 51.65 | 35.83 | 34.67 | 37.71 | 28.39 | 26.11 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 37.9% | 38.5% | 37.6% | 35.8% | 39.5% | 41.1% | 40.1% | 39.4% | 41.6% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 16.0% | 15.8% | 14.5% | 13.6% | 16.1% | 17.8% | 17.9% | 16.8% | 14.5% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.5% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 10.2% | 10.7% | 12.0% | 13.3% | 13.1% | 17.6% | 9.9% | 10.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.2% | 14.2% | 15.2% | 13.9% | 14.9% | 18.1% | 20.2% | 21.2% | 32.4% | 22.7% | 28.4% |
| ROA | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.1% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 6.0% | 6.7% | 6.8% | 9.0% | 6.4% | 10.3% |
| ROIC | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.3% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 8.5% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 8.8% | 10.1% | 16.2% |
| ROCE | 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.6% | 9.9% | 8.9% | 10.8% | 11.6% | 11.6% | 10.7% | 12.0% | 19.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 1.13 | 1.22 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.48 | 1.96 | 0.88 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.02 | 3.02 | 3.55 | 3.95 | 5.00 | 4.49 | 4.21 | 3.87 | 4.51 | 6.09 | 1.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.21 | 1.45 | 1.88 | 0.81 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.95 | 2.95 | 3.41 | 3.81 | 4.69 | 4.19 | 3.85 | 3.73 | 4.42 | 5.87 | 1.77 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.27 | 6.68 | 4.55 | 12.82 | 9.15 | 5.49 | 5.39 | 7.05 | 7.65 | 2.63 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.65 | 5.65 | 5.29 | 4.84 | 6.45 | 7.56 | 7.50 | 5.96 | 5.25 | 7.67 | 11.52 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.47 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.95 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.34 | 3.34 | 3.33 | 3.69 | 3.04 | 3.23 | 3.20 | 4.00 | 4.09 | 3.56 | 3.41 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 33.56 | 31.89 | 32.19 | 32.97 | 31.75 | 34.44 | 34.33 | 35.66 | 41.91 | 38.49 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.8% | 2.7% | 0.3% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 61.2% | 61.2% | 8.5% | 61.5% | 58.2% | 48.1% | 44.2% | 43.0% | 29.3% | 49.8% | 46.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.3% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 3.1% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 5.9% | 4.1% | 3.1% | 5.6% | 1.7% | 2.4% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 3.3% | 4.8% | 4.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 2.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.1% | 2.9% | 0.6% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 3.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $269M | $270M | $270M | $270M | $270M | $269M | $268M | $267M | $257M | $256M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MKC-V stock.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated's current P/E ratio is 16.0x. The historical average is 24.3x. This places it at the 12th percentile of its historical range.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated's current EV/EBITDA is 12.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.7x.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated's return on equity (ROE) is 14.2%. The historical average is 23.7%.
Based on historical data, McCormick & Company, Incorporated is trading at a P/E of 16.0x. This is at the 12th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated's current dividend yield is 3.83% with a payout ratio of 61.2%.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated has 37.9% gross margin and 16.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Non-recurring gains inflate earnings ratios
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Acquisition Growth Undercuts Earnings Multiple Support
At a 15.6x trailing P/E and 12.2x EV/EBITDA, MKC-V screens mid-pack for packaged-food peers, though as reported in recent financial statements the PEG of 14.77 signals the multiple is not being paid for genuine per-share earnings growth.
The forward P/E of 14.82 sits below the 15.60 trailing figure, but that narrowing appears driven more by depressed trailing earnings in 2026Q2 and 2026Q3 — where reported EPS fell 13.8% and 57.1% year over year — than by confidence in accretive acquisition integration. Relative to peers, the 12.2x EV/EBITDA is materially below Church & Dwight's 18.2x and Smucker's 34.0x but above Campbell's 7.2x, suggesting MKC-V is priced for quality-of-earnings questions rather than pure sector discounting, a gap investors should revisit alongside the 3.9% dividend yield.
Gross Margin Recovery Offset by Rising Overhead
According to recent SEC filings, MKC-V's gross margin recovered to 39.3% in 2026Q3 from a 37.4% trough in 2025Q3, yet operating margin compressed to 10.7% from 16.7% a year earlier, indicating cost discipline below the gross line is not reaching the operating result.
The divergence between gross and operating margin suggests integration and acquisition-related overhead is absorbing the pricing-driven gross recovery, consistent with SG&A rising from $352.5 million to $436.4 million year over year. Reported net margin in 2026Q1 of 54.6% reflects a large non-operating gain rather than earning power, so core profitability is best represented by operating margin near 11% — still ahead of Hormel's 4.0% and Conagra's negative margin, but well below the company's own 2024Q4 level of 18.0%.
Returns on Capital Erode Beneath Acquisition Inflation
As reported in financial statements, MKC-V's ROIC has hovered between 1.4% and 2.6% over the last ten quarters while ROE spiked to 15.3% in 2026Q1, an anomaly that appears tied to a non-recurring gain rather than any improvement in capital efficiency.
ROIC of 1.4% in 2026Q3 is the lowest in the observed window and compares with Church & Dwight's 13.9% and Campbell's 9.1%, indicating MKC-V's asset base — now roughly 90% goodwill-weighted relative to equity — is generating thin returns on invested capital even as revenue has scaled. Asset turnover of just 0.12–0.14 confirms the business is capital-heavy per dollar of sales in accounting terms, which means the goodwill build from acquisitions must earn incremental returns quickly to avoid ROIC decay.
Debt Repaid Faster Than Earnings Can Cover
Per the reported balance sheet, D/E fell to 0.56 in 2026Q3 from 0.85 in 2024Q4 as total debt declined to $4.2 billion, yet interest coverage slipped to 3.17x from 6.01x, suggesting deleveraging is outpacing earnings improvement.
The combination of falling debt and falling coverage indicates the coverage decline is being driven by weaker operating profit rather than new borrowing, which investors should distinguish from typical leverage risk since net debt of roughly $3.9 billion remains a durable drag on returns. At 19.6x D/EBITDA in 2026Q3 versus 10.2x in 2025Q4, leverage measured against trailing EBITDA has deteriorated sharply, though the trajectory versus Campbell (D/E of 1.85) or Smucker (1.28) still looks comparatively manageable.
Sub-Unit Current Ratio Leaves No Margin for Error
Based on reported figures, MKC-V's current ratio fell to 0.66 in 2026Q3 with quick ratio at the same level, against a cash balance of just $331 million versus $4.2 billion of total debt, implying a thin nominal liquidity cushion.
The near-identical current and quick ratios in 2026Q3 suggest the reported current ratio is not materially supported by inventory, given that inventories were roughly 102–112 days of supply in earlier quarters, and a current ratio below one may simply reflect a financeable model relying on cash generation timing rather than balance-sheet resilience. Under stress, that reliance would be tested by volatile working capital swings of over $400 million quarter to quarter, and with DPO of 112 days the company's supplier terms are doing meaningful financing work that a standard liquidity read understates.
The P/E Is the Most Misleading Ratio Here
The 15.6x trailing P/E is the ratio most commonly misapplied to MKC-V's model, because as reported in recent quarterly filings a $1.0 billion non-operating gain inflated 2026Q1 net income to $1.0 billion, making headline earnings appear far stronger than operating reality.
Because that gain inflated reported net income by an order of magnitude without generating comparable operating cash — the 2026Q1 operating cash flow-to-net-income ratio was 0.05 — trailing P/E and PEG figures are anchored to a distorted earnings base that makes MKC-V look cheaper than its operating profile warrants. A more informative lens is EV/EBITDA, which at 12.2x appears to normalize out the non-recurring item, paired with FCF margin, which swung from -0.1% to 36.0% over ten quarters and still averages far below reported net margin after the acquisition spend and dividends that absorbed roughly 86% of cumulative free cash flow.