Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.2x · EV/EBITDA 17.5x · ROE 75.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $87.3B | $86.3B | $71.3B | $50.6B | $56.9B | $86.9B | $85.1B | $86.3B | $95.9B | $120.6B | $92.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $95.0B | $94.0B | $79.4B | $61.6B | $70.1B | $100.7B | $100.2B | $105.2B | $107.7B | $131.5B | $101.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.22 | 26.68 | 17.10 | — | 9.85 | 14.67 | 15.61 | 18.89 | 17.92 | 24.82 | 18.30 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.50 | 3.46 | 2.90 | 2.06 | 1.66 | 2.46 | 2.64 | 2.69 | 2.93 | 3.81 | 3.07 |
| P/B Ratio | 19.22 | 18.18 | 18.31 | 10.40 | 3.85 | 5.75 | 6.58 | 8.52 | 9.74 | 10.37 | 8.93 |
| P/FCF | 62.55 | 61.82 | 111.77 | 10.00 | 14.81 | 14.86 | 12.87 | 16.07 | 19.73 | 24.77 | 17.62 |
| P/OCF | 37.87 | 37.42 | 39.20 | 7.58 | 10.18 | 11.66 | 10.49 | 12.21 | 14.89 | 19.32 | 13.87 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.77 | 3.23 | 2.50 | 2.05 | 2.85 | 3.11 | 3.27 | 3.29 | 4.15 | 3.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.46 | 17.28 | 12.89 | 11.25 | 11.87 | 10.66 | 11.30 | 12.28 | 11.63 | 15.00 | 11.97 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.82 | 18.90 | 13.23 | — | 10.18 | 13.14 | 13.64 | 17.13 | 14.88 | 17.23 | 14.00 |
| EV / FCF | — | 67.33 | 124.40 | 12.17 | 18.25 | 17.21 | 15.15 | 19.59 | 22.16 | 27.02 | 19.40 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 39.6% | 41.0% | 38.9% | 43.7% | 47.0% | 48.5% | 47.6% | 49.4% | 49.5% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | 20.1% | 16.4% | 11.9% | 21.3% | 21.6% | 21.7% | 23.7% | 22.8% | 23.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.0% | 13.0% | 17.0% | -28.4% | 16.9% | 16.7% | 16.9% | 14.2% | 16.3% | 15.3% | 16.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 75.2% | 75.2% | 95.3% | -71.2% | 38.7% | 42.2% | 47.3% | 45.8% | 49.8% | 44.2% | 46.3% |
| ROA | 8.4% | 8.4% | 9.2% | -14.4% | 12.4% | 12.5% | 11.8% | 11.3% | 14.4% | 13.7% | 15.4% |
| ROIC | 28.1% | 28.1% | 26.6% | 13.8% | 10.7% | 19.8% | 18.3% | 20.6% | 26.3% | 25.7% | 26.2% |
| ROCE | 16.1% | 16.1% | 15.4% | 11.2% | 10.9% | 19.4% | 18.6% | 21.6% | 26.1% | 25.4% | 26.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.73 | 2.73 | 3.51 | 3.44 | 1.14 | 1.21 | 1.53 | 2.10 | 1.49 | 1.21 | 1.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.38 | 2.38 | 2.22 | 3.06 | 2.85 | 1.94 | 2.23 | 2.48 | 1.59 | 1.60 | 1.38 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.62 | 2.07 | 2.26 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 1.87 | 1.20 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.31 | 2.01 | 2.24 | 1.46 | 1.70 | 2.21 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.52 | 12.63 | 2.17 | 3.44 | 2.35 | 2.29 | 3.52 | 2.44 | 2.25 | 1.77 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.91 | 6.91 | 5.08 | -11.09 | 13.84 | 16.76 | 13.29 | 14.25 | 30.17 | 90.86 | 35.07 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.41 | 1.07 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 1.89 | 1.86 | 1.89 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.08 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 1.15 | 1.35 | 0.96 | 1.29 | 1.33 | 1.34 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.49 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.12 | 4.12 | 3.92 | 3.81 | 3.59 | 3.76 | 3.91 | 4.07 | 3.80 | 3.97 | 4.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 51.69 | 48.60 | 55.02 | 49.43 | 49.24 | 54.78 | 56.37 | 57.07 | 57.44 | 54.56 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.4% | 2.8% | 6.5% | 5.9% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 36.2% | 36.2% | 47.5% | — | 58.3% | 57.8% | 62.2% | 72.6% | 59.7% | 57.7% | 53.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.5% | 3.7% | 5.8% | — | 10.2% | 6.8% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 5.6% | 4.0% | 5.5% |
| FCF Yield | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 10.0% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 7.8% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 4.0% | 5.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.5% | 5.6% | 2.5% | 0.1% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 0.4% | 1.6% | 5.1% | 1.7% | 4.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.8% | 6.9% | 5.3% | 6.6% | 8.5% | 6.5% | 4.4% | 5.5% | 8.4% | 4.0% | 7.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $539M | $552M | $554M | $568M | $585M | $582M | $585M | $602M | $613M | $619M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MMM stock.
3M Company's current P/E ratio is 28.2x. The historical average is 17.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
3M Company's current EV/EBITDA is 17.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.4x.
3M Company's return on equity (ROE) is 75.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 33.4%.
Based on historical data, 3M Company is trading at a P/E of 28.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
3M Company's current dividend yield is 1.29% with a payout ratio of 36.2%.
3M Company has 39.6% gross margin and 18.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
3M Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage and litigation overhang
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability
3M's gross margin averaged roughly 40% over the past year, but operating margin swung from 12.9% to 24.7%, according to quarterly filings, indicating uneven cost control and non-operating items distorting true earning power.
The latest quarter's operating margin of 15.1% sits well below the 20%+ levels seen in several prior quarters, suggesting that recent profitability may be pressured by one-time charges or operational inefficiencies. Net margin of 14.4% in 2026Q2 is more stable than operating margin, implying that non-operating items (e.g., gains or tax effects) are smoothing the bottom line. Investors should focus on gross margin stability around 41% as the core earnings driver, while treating operating margin swings as a signal of potential litigation or restructuring costs.
ROIC Decay Despite High ROE
ROIC has hovered between 4.6% and 10.0% over the past ten quarters, while ROE spiked to 29.5% in 2026Q2, as per reported figures, indicating that returns on equity are amplified by a shrinking equity base rather than operational improvement.
The divergence between ROE and ROIC is stark: ROE of 29.5% in 2026Q2 is inflated by equity that has collapsed to $3.0B, while ROIC of 6.0% reflects a more modest return on invested capital. This suggests that the company is not compounding returns on a sustainable basis; instead, the balance sheet is being deleveraged through asset sales and payouts, which temporarily boosts ROE. The trend in ROIC, which has not exceeded 10% in the last ten quarters, indicates that underlying business returns are mediocre and may be deteriorating relative to the cost of capital.
Working Capital Efficiency Stalls
3M's cash conversion cycle has lengthened from 72 days in 2026Q2 to 99 days in 2024Q1, according to quarterly data, driven by slower inventory turnover and extended payment terms, indicating reduced working capital efficiency.
DSO has remained stable around 52-54 days, but DIO has risen from 85 days to 89 days over the past year, while DPO has increased from 61 to 70 days, suggesting that 3M is stretching supplier payments to offset inventory buildup. The net effect is a CCC that has improved slightly from 99 to 72 days, but this is still elevated compared to historical norms, implying that cash is tied up in operations. Asset turnover of 0.18 is extremely low, reflecting the company's asset-heavy balance sheet and recent asset shrinkage, which may indicate that the remaining asset base is not generating sufficient sales.
Leverage Elevated as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity surged to 4.18 in 2026Q2 from 2.73 in 2025Q4, while D/EBITDA rose to 11.21, based on reported figures, indicating that debt service is becoming less comfortable despite absolute debt reduction.
Total debt has fallen from $22.2B to $12.6B over ten quarters, but equity has shrunk even faster, dropping to $3.0B, which has pushed leverage ratios to extreme levels. Interest coverage of 5.33 in 2026Q1 is thin, and the absence of a reported figure for 2026Q2 suggests it may have deteriorated further. The high D/EBITDA of 11.21 implies that EBITDA is insufficient to cover debt obligations comfortably, and any further earnings pressure could strain debt service. This leverage is a key risk, especially given the litigation overhang that could require additional cash outflows.
Liquidity Buffer Thinning Rapidly
The current ratio fell to 1.24 in 2026Q2 from 1.71 in 2025Q4, and cash dropped from $10.9B to $3.0B over ten quarters, according to SEC filings, indicating a shrinking liquidity cushion.
The quick ratio of 0.91 in 2026Q2 is below 1.0, suggesting that 3M may struggle to cover short-term liabilities without relying on inventory sales, which could be problematic in a downturn. The rapid depletion of cash, combined with a current ratio that is approaching 1.0, indicates that the company has limited buffer to absorb unexpected cash needs, such as litigation settlements or operational disruptions. This thinning liquidity is a concern, especially given the volatile free cash flow, which has been negative in several quarters over the past year.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Power
The trailing P/E of 30.34 and forward P/E of 20.44, as per market data, may mislead investors because earnings are volatile and include non-operating items, obscuring the true earnings power of the business.
The P/E ratio is commonly used to value 3M, but given the significant swings in net income—from $1.07 to $2.48 EPS over the past year—the trailing P/E is not a reliable indicator of value. The forward P/E of 20.44 is more reasonable, but it still relies on analyst estimates that may not fully capture litigation costs or restructuring charges. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA, which at 18.67 is elevated relative to peers like Honeywell (12.46) and Emerson (20.02), but it still does not adjust for the high leverage and potential cash flow volatility. Investors should consider a normalized earnings figure that excludes one-time items and uses a mid-cycle margin to assess valuation.