Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.2x · EV/EBITDA 13.7x · ROE 34.4%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $59.7B | $54.4B | $48.7B | $36.8B | $33.2B | $30.4B | $22.8B | $23.1B | $23.1B | $13.8B | $11.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $83.7B | $78.4B | $68.6B | $56.7B | $53.2B | $49.4B | $43.4B | $43.4B | $36.4B | $21.1B | $15.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.20 | 11.07 | 11.37 | 9.61 | 8.76 | 10.35 | — | 24.72 | 12.68 | 33.46 | 11540.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.05 | 4.60 | 4.46 | 3.53 | 3.15 | 3.17 | 2.71 | 2.68 | 3.47 | 3.73 | 3.89 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.13 | 3.74 | 3.47 | 2.71 | 2.45 | 2.33 | 1.63 | 1.31 | 2.93 | 1.25 | 1.03 |
| P/FCF | 14.55 | 13.26 | 9.95 | 8.25 | 7.87 | 6.93 | 6.82 | 13.79 | 25.42 | 27.75 | 142.70 |
| P/OCF | 10.10 | 9.20 | 8.19 | 6.82 | 6.61 | 6.19 | 5.03 | 5.66 | 8.16 | 7.22 | 9.09 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.64 | 6.29 | 5.43 | 5.05 | 5.16 | 5.17 | 5.03 | 5.47 | 5.71 | 5.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.69 | 12.83 | 10.44 | 9.27 | 8.67 | 9.37 | 27.34 | 11.95 | 10.12 | 11.25 | 12.47 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.58 | 13.19 | 12.91 | 11.62 | 11.01 | 12.66 | 291.39 | 18.67 | 13.94 | 18.58 | 25.09 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.12 | 14.03 | 12.70 | 12.64 | 11.28 | 13.01 | 25.92 | 40.10 | 42.51 | 193.71 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 45.2% | 44.2% | 43.7% | 40.7% | 42.3% | 44.6% | 42.5% | 41.7% | 35.5% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 40.3% | 40.3% | 48.5% | 47.0% | 46.6% | 41.7% | 2.5% | 27.5% | 41.0% | 32.3% | 22.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 41.6% | 41.6% | 39.6% | 37.6% | 37.4% | 32.1% | -8.6% | 12.0% | 27.3% | 21.5% | 7.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 34.4% | 34.4% | 31.3% | 29.0% | 29.7% | 22.8% | -4.6% | 8.1% | 19.3% | 7.1% | 2.2% |
| ROA | 12.2% | 12.2% | 11.7% | 10.9% | 11.1% | 8.6% | -1.9% | 3.3% | 8.6% | 4.4% | 1.4% |
| ROIC | 9.9% | 9.9% | 11.8% | 11.0% | 11.2% | 9.0% | 0.4% | 6.0% | 10.4% | 5.3% | 3.4% |
| ROCE | 12.9% | 12.9% | 15.5% | 14.6% | 15.0% | 12.0% | 0.6% | 7.9% | 13.7% | 7.0% | 4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.53 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 1.46 | 1.48 | 1.16 | 1.70 | 0.67 | 0.39 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.28 | 4.28 | 3.26 | 3.42 | 3.31 | 3.61 | 13.02 | 5.59 | 3.73 | 3.91 | 3.47 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.65 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.48 | 1.15 | 1.69 | 0.67 | 0.37 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.93 | 3.93 | 3.03 | 3.25 | 3.27 | 3.61 | 13.01 | 5.59 | 3.70 | 3.91 | 3.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.86 | 4.07 | 4.45 | 4.76 | 4.35 | 6.19 | 12.12 | 14.68 | 14.76 | 51.01 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.05 | 6.05 | 5.77 | 5.28 | 5.23 | 4.44 | 0.17 | 2.54 | 3.95 | 3.21 | 3.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.01 | 1.07 | 0.79 | 0.45 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.43 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.96 | 1.01 | 0.73 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.34 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | 37.63 | 37.63 | 33.82 | 36.92 | 42.24 | 38.87 | 39.43 | 45.15 | 50.36 | 36.63 | 35.91 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.75 | 51.68 | 54.64 | 51.21 | 50.17 | 50.59 | 54.08 | 38.74 | 44.70 | 50.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.7% | 7.4% | 7.3% | 8.6% | 8.8% | 11.3% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 26.8% | 23.1% | 8.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 81.8% | 81.8% | 82.4% | 81.0% | 74.1% | 111.5% | — | 284.3% | 339.3% | 401.0% | 407.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.2% | 9.0% | 8.8% | 10.4% | 11.4% | 9.7% | — | 4.0% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield | 6.9% | 7.5% | 10.0% | 12.1% | 12.7% | 14.4% | 14.7% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 0.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 13.4% | 12.8% | 12.7% | 26.8% | 23.3% | 8.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $907M | $761M | $388M | $338M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MPLX stock.
MPLX Lp's current P/E ratio is 12.2x. The historical average is 36.2x. This places it at the 42th percentile of its historical range.
MPLX Lp's current EV/EBITDA is 13.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.7x.
MPLX Lp's return on equity (ROE) is 34.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 14.4%.
Based on historical data, MPLX Lp is trading at a P/E of 12.2x. This is at the 42th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MPLX Lp's current dividend yield is 6.70% with a payout ratio of 81.8%.
MPLX Lp has 45.2% gross margin and 40.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
MPLX Lp's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commodity price and volume volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion on Volume Leverage
Gross margin surged to 56.9% in 2026Q2 from 41.0% in 2026Q1, per reported financials, reflecting strong operating leverage and favorable product mix, while net margin remains robust at 32.8%.
The sequential jump in gross margin suggests that incremental volumes flow through with minimal variable cost, a hallmark of the high-fixed-cost midstream model. Operating margin of 41.6% in 2026Q2, though slightly below the 2025Q3 peak of 49.8%, indicates that the company retains significant pricing power and cost discipline. The narrow gap between operating and net margins implies minimal non-operating drag, but investors should monitor whether the margin expansion is sustainable given commodity price volatility.
ROIC Stability Amidst Expansion
ROIC has remained in a tight 2.0%-3.7% band over the past ten quarters, per reported data, despite a 18% increase in invested capital, suggesting that growth projects are not yet generating incremental returns.
The stability of ROIC at around 2.6% in 2026Q2, despite a significant capex surge, indicates that the company is in an investment phase where returns lag capital deployment. This is consistent with the balance sheet expansion and rising PPE, but it raises questions about the eventual return on these projects. ROE, however, is much higher at 34.4% (annualized), reflecting the benefits of leverage and equity buybacks, but this metric may overstate true economic returns given the high debt levels.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 49 days in 2026Q2 from 43 days in 2025Q3, per reported figures, driven by a rise in DSO to 46 days, indicating slower collections from customers.
The increase in DSO suggests that MPLX is extending credit terms to its customers, possibly to support volumes, but this ties up cash and reduces operational efficiency. The current ratio of 0.89 in 2026Q2, down from 1.31 in 2025Q3, indicates that current liabilities now exceed current assets, a liquidity concern that warrants monitoring. Asset turnover remains low at 0.08, typical for asset-heavy midstream, but the declining efficiency in working capital management could pressure cash flows if not reversed.
Leverage Creeps Higher with Debt-Funded Growth
Debt-to-equity rose to 1.82 in 2026Q2 from 1.54 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage fell to 4.77, indicating a thinner cushion for debt service.
The increase in leverage is a direct result of the elevated capital expenditure program, with total debt climbing to $25.9B. Although the D/EBITDA of 14.86 is elevated, this metric is distorted by the low EBITDA relative to debt due to the asset-heavy model; a more appropriate measure would be debt to distributable cash flow. The interest coverage of 4.77, while still adequate, has declined from 7.02 in 2025Q3, suggesting that rising debt levels and potentially higher interest rates are eroding the safety margin. Investors should monitor whether the growth projects generate sufficient cash flow to service this debt.
Liquidity Buffer Thins as Cash Declines
Cash dropped to $1.0B in 2026Q2 from $2.5B in 2025Q1, per balance sheet data, and the current ratio fell to 0.89, indicating a tighter liquidity position relative to short-term obligations.
The decline in cash and the sub-1.0 current ratio suggest that MPLX is relying on its revolving credit facility or other sources to meet near-term obligations. However, the company's strong operating cash flow generation, with OCF/NI consistently above 1.0, provides a buffer. The liquidity position is not yet critical, but the trend warrants monitoring, especially if commodity price volatility reduces cash flows.
Misapplied P/E in MLP Valuation
The P/E ratio of 12.2 is often used to compare MPLX with C-corps, but for MLPs, distributable cash flow (DCF) is the more relevant metric, as GAAP earnings include non-cash charges.
The market frequently applies a P/E multiple to MPLX, but this is misleading because the company's earnings are heavily impacted by depreciation and amortization, which are non-cash. A more appropriate valuation metric is price-to-DCF or EV/EBITDA, which better captures the cash-generating ability of the business. The current EV/EBITDA of 13.69 is at a premium to peers like ET (9.61) and PAA (9.68), suggesting that the market is pricing in MPLX's superior balance sheet and captive relationship with MPC. Investors should focus on DCF yield and distribution coverage rather than P/E when assessing MPLX's value.