Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -272.7%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $102M | $183M | $39M | $106M | $22M | $129M | $240M | $312M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $97M | $179M | $69M | $137M | $19M | $119M | $239M | $310M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | 21.00 | 121.59 | 20.20 | 198.16 | 323.04 | 1554.94 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 9.52 | 12.62 | 1.48 | 0.89 | 2.31 | 9.69 | 88.93 | 65.67 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 54.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 54.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | 36.79 | 157.69 | 17.63 | 181.71 | 322.18 | 1541.72 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 95.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 103.9% | 103.9% | 76.6% | 69.6% | 66.1% | 66.1% | 84.3% | 29.0% | -3486.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 239.1% | 239.1% | -4993.6% | -493.2% | -550.8% | -992.8% | -429.1% | -1464.6% | -8379.4% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 273.7% | 273.7% | -4879.7% | -956.1% | -526.0% | -1079.7% | -428.7% | -1117.2% | -8738.2% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -272.7% | -272.7% | -125.3% | -13.0% | -49.7% | -87.9% | -85.4% | -104.1% | — | -125.9% | -58.2% |
| ROA | -133.0% | -133.0% | -81.8% | -9.9% | -43.4% | -77.1% | -64.2% | -68.3% | -595.0% | -111.9% | -54.4% |
| ROIC | -111.4% | -111.4% | -67.8% | -4.1% | -96.0% | -208.4% | -114.9% | -244.8% | — | -274.0% | — |
| ROCE | -128.3% | -128.3% | -88.8% | -5.3% | -49.9% | -78.5% | -75.3% | -118.6% | — | -125.9% | -58.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 1.22 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.29 | 0.21 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.32 | 1.11 | 0.26 | -0.29 | -0.80 | -0.24 | -0.56 | — | -0.73 | -0.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 41.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -5.46 | -5.46 | -36.63 | -4.88 | — | — | — | — | -195750.00 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 12.50 | 12.50 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 7.70 | 12.27 | 3.42 | 5.40 | 0.41 | 3.43 | 14.37 |
| Quick Ratio | 12.50 | 12.50 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 7.70 | 12.27 | 2.45 | 4.93 | 0.41 | 3.43 | 13.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 12.23 | 12.23 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 3.25 | 9.93 | 2.17 | 4.52 | 0.12 | 2.32 | 8.87 |
| Asset Turnover | — | -1.11 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.07 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.18 | 0.38 | — | — | 0.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | -0.09 | 0.97 | 429.63 | 1674.45 | 1299.73 | 82.33 | 82.12 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 1.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $54M | $25M | $13M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $5M | $5M |
Existential regulatory and solvency
According to recent market data, MTC trades at a P/B ratio of 8.82, which appears disconnected from its negative revenue trajectory and suggests that investors are pricing the firm based on speculative residual value rather than any tangible earnings power or growth potential in the current environment.
The negative TTM P/E ratio of -2.28 confirms that the company is currently unable to generate positive earnings, rendering traditional valuation multiples largely irrelevant for fundamental assessment. Investors should monitor whether the current valuation is supported by the remaining cash pile or if it represents a total decoupling from the underlying business reality.
Based on reported figures, MTC's ROIC has plummeted to -22.1% in 2025Q4, a trend that highlights a consistent failure to generate returns on invested capital and suggests that the company's historical investments in software infrastructure have failed to create sustainable value for shareholders over the long term.
The persistent negative ROE and ROIC trends suggest that the firm is effectively destroying capital with every operational cycle. This decay appears structural rather than cyclical, as the company has been unable to pivot its cost base to match the rapid contraction in its revenue-generating capacity.
As reported in financial statements, the lack of consistent asset turnover and working capital data makes it difficult to assess operational efficiency, though the erratic nature of historical DSO figures suggests significant challenges in collecting fees from the firm's small-cap institutional client base.
The absence of meaningful turnover metrics implies that the company's internal processes for managing receivables and operational assets are currently in a state of disarray. This lack of transparency warrants further investigation into whether the firm's software-as-a-service model is even capable of achieving the scale required for operational self-sufficiency.
According to the most recent quarterly filings, MTC maintains a current ratio of 12.50, yet this figure is misleading as it masks the rapid depletion of the company's cash reserves and the lack of a viable path to restore positive operating cash flow in the near term.
While the high current ratio might suggest a strong liquidity position, the underlying reality is that the firm is burning through its cash reserves to fund ongoing losses. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate closely, as the current liquidity buffer may be insufficient to support the business if revenue remains negative.
Market participants often misapply standard SaaS valuation multiples like EV/Sales to MTC, which obscures the fact that the company's revenue is currently negative and its business model is fundamentally threatened by regulatory shifts in the PRC rather than standard competitive pressures in the software industry.
Using traditional SaaS metrics for MTC is inappropriate because the firm lacks the recurring revenue stability and growth profile that these multiples are designed to capture. Analysts should instead focus on the company's cash runway and its ability to navigate the regulatory environment, as these are the true determinants of its survival.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTC stock.
MMTec, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
MMTec, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -272.7%. The historical average is -102.5%.
Based on historical data, MMTec, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MMTec, Inc. has 103.9% gross margin and 239.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.