Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -383.1x · EV/EBITDA 112.8x · ROE -4.4%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.3B | $9.4B | $8.2B | $5.8B | $3.7B | $4.6B | $2.3B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.8B | $9.9B | $8.5B | $6.1B | $4.2B | $5.0B | $2.8B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $3.3B | $2.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -383.14 | — | 107.23 | 63.73 | 8.38 | 121.00 | — | — | — | — | 1411.33 |
| P/S Ratio | 22.06 | 9.75 | 11.25 | 9.00 | 5.46 | 7.59 | 4.25 | 2.83 | 2.36 | 3.88 | 4.15 |
| P/B Ratio | 15.59 | 7.10 | 7.28 | 6.16 | 4.37 | 9.76 | 7.50 | 4.53 | 2.01 | 3.48 | 4.88 |
| P/FCF | 139.29 | 61.53 | 58.52 | 41.02 | 24.49 | 35.30 | 14.64 | — | — | 95.87 | 47.94 |
| P/OCF | 90.66 | 40.05 | 50.45 | 34.95 | 20.83 | 31.03 | 13.13 | 68.21 | 37.07 | 44.36 | 28.52 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.19 | 11.71 | 9.48 | 6.17 | 8.20 | 5.32 | 4.06 | 3.41 | 4.67 | 4.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 112.80 | 51.06 | 56.55 | 36.45 | 21.94 | 32.97 | 33.82 | 236.75 | 86.84 | 23.21 | 23.25 |
| EV / EBIT | 167.87 | — | 88.41 | 48.19 | 16.84 | 78.33 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 64.31 | 60.96 | 43.22 | 27.69 | 38.15 | 18.33 | — | — | 115.57 | 53.26 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.9% | 54.9% | 50.9% | 55.8% | 56.4% | 51.2% | 44.8% | 35.2% | 34.6% | 47.9% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | 11.5% | 18.0% | 19.7% | 13.3% | 0.9% | -19.2% | -15.8% | 6.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.6% | -5.6% | 10.5% | 14.1% | 65.2% | 6.3% | -8.7% | -76.8% | -24.5% | -24.3% | 0.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.4% | -4.4% | 7.4% | 10.2% | 66.9% | 9.8% | -15.1% | -78.3% | -19.4% | -27.3% | 0.3% |
| ROA | -2.8% | -2.8% | 4.6% | 5.9% | 32.5% | 3.3% | -4.1% | -29.7% | -9.0% | -12.0% | 0.1% |
| ROIC | 6.0% | 6.0% | 4.6% | 6.8% | 9.2% | 7.1% | 0.4% | -6.5% | -5.2% | 3.5% | 4.1% |
| ROCE | 7.6% | 7.6% | 5.4% | 7.9% | 10.5% | 7.7% | 0.4% | -8.0% | -6.2% | 3.6% | 4.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 1.12 | 2.32 | 2.22 | 1.04 | 0.88 | 1.26 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.79 | 2.79 | 3.23 | 2.89 | 3.16 | 3.50 | 8.36 | 80.82 | 31.01 | 4.88 | 5.40 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 1.89 | 1.98 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.26 | 1.86 | 2.53 | 2.46 | 6.81 | 72.01 | 26.79 | 3.96 | 2.32 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.78 | 2.43 | 2.20 | 3.19 | 2.85 | 3.69 | — | — | 19.70 | 5.32 |
| Interest Coverage | -4.26 | -4.26 | 18.82 | 10.30 | 28.93 | 2.88 | -0.52 | -10.82 | -3.95 | -0.72 | -0.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.71 | 3.71 | 8.35 | 9.11 | 8.36 | 5.61 | 5.07 | 5.33 | 4.29 | 4.81 | 6.65 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.98 | 2.98 | 6.55 | 7.48 | 7.18 | 4.72 | 4.11 | 3.88 | 3.14 | 3.64 | 5.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.42 | 2.42 | 5.38 | 6.16 | 6.03 | 3.71 | 3.51 | 2.36 | 1.80 | 1.83 | 3.87 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.83 | 1.83 | 1.84 | 2.10 | 2.56 | 3.58 | 3.20 | 3.00 | 3.03 | 2.68 | 2.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 56.09 | 52.88 | 51.37 | 54.90 | 50.86 | 31.60 | 63.15 | 73.57 | 80.75 | 87.13 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 0.9% | 1.6% | 11.9% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | 0.1% |
| FCF Yield | 0.7% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 2.4% | 4.1% | 2.8% | 6.8% | — | — | 1.0% | 2.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $74M | $74M | $72M | $71M | $70M | $67M | $66M | $65M | $61M | $53M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTSI stock.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -383.1x. The historical average is 60.0x.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 112.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 33.4x.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.4%. The historical average is -0.3%.
Based on historical data, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -383.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. has 54.9% gross margin and 13.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Negative net margin persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masks Bottom-Line Drag
Gross margin expanded 860 basis points to 58.3% by 2026Q3, yet net margin remains negative at -5.6%, per the latest quarterly data, indicating non-operating charges are suppressing reported profitability.
The gross margin trajectory from 49.7% in 2024Q2 to 58.3% in 2026Q3 reflects a favorable mix shift toward defense and data center products, as reported in the financial statements. However, the persistent negative net margin, despite operating margin of 22.5%, suggests that items below the operating line—likely acquisition-related amortization or one-time charges—are distorting bottom-line results. Investors should monitor whether these charges abate, as the operating leverage demonstrated by the 1,380 basis point operating margin expansion indicates underlying earning power is improving.
Return on Capital Inflecting Upward
ROIC improved from 0.9% in 2024Q2 to 3.3% in 2026Q3, per the quarterly ratio data, signaling a gradual recovery in capital efficiency, though still below the cost of capital.
The steady climb in ROIC, driven by margin expansion rather than asset turnover (which remained flat near 0.13), suggests that the company is beginning to generate returns on its invested capital after a period of heavy investment. The negative ROE of -4.4% on a trailing basis, however, indicates that shareholder returns are still being diluted by the cumulative losses and the recent acquisition. As the integration of the Wolfspeed RF business matures, ROIC should be monitored for further improvement, but the current level remains insufficient to justify the premium valuation without sustained progress.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
Cash conversion cycle extended to 172 days in 2026Q3 from 188 days in 2024Q2, as DIO rose to 170 days, according to the quarterly data, indicating increased inventory investment ahead of expected demand.
The rise in days inventory outstanding from 168 days in 2024Q2 to 170 days in 2026Q3, coupled with a stable DSO around 45 days, suggests that MTSI is building inventory to support the accelerated revenue growth and the expanded product portfolio. The slight improvement in DPO from 36 to 43 days indicates the company is taking longer to pay suppliers, which partially offsets the inventory build. However, the overall CCC of 172 days remains elevated, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the semiconductor business and the need for careful working capital management as growth continues.
Deleveraging Strengthens Balance Sheet
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.46 in 2024Q2 to 0.24 in 2026Q3, while interest coverage improved to 84.5x, per the balance sheet data, indicating a significantly reduced leverage burden.
The reduction in total debt from $574.9M in 2026Q1 to $371.1M in 2026Q3, as reported in the balance sheet, has improved the debt-to-EBITDA ratio from 14.6x to 4.6x, though the latter remains elevated due to depressed EBITDA. The interest coverage of 84.5x in 2026Q3 suggests that debt service is highly comfortable, but the low absolute level of EBITDA means that any operational downturn could quickly pressure coverage. The deleveraging trend appears deliberate and provides a buffer against cyclicality, but the high EV/EBITDA multiple of 127x implies the market is pricing in substantial future EBITDA growth.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Adequate
Current ratio declined to 2.34 in 2026Q3 from 3.56 in 2025Q2, per the quarterly data, yet remains above 2.0, indicating a still-adequate liquidity position despite tighter working capital.
The quick ratio of 1.78 in 2026Q3, down from 2.86 in 2025Q2, suggests that the company's liquid assets are sufficient to cover short-term obligations, though the reliance on inventory (with DIO at 170 days) introduces some risk if demand softens. The cash balance of $89.6M, as per the balance sheet, is modest relative to the company's scale, but the low leverage and strong interest coverage provide alternative sources of liquidity. Under a severe stress scenario, the company could likely draw on its credit facilities, but the declining current ratio warrants monitoring as growth continues.
EV/EBITDA Misleads in M&A Context
The trailing EV/EBITDA of 127x, per the valuation data, is distorted by acquisition-related charges and depressed EBITDA, obscuring the underlying earnings power of the combined business.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for MTSI is EV/EBITDA, as the recent acquisition of Wolfspeed's RF business has loaded the income statement with amortization and integration costs, artificially depressing EBITDA. This makes the multiple appear extreme and not comparable to peers like Qorvo (13.4x) or Skyworks (10.9x). Instead, investors should focus on forward EV/EBITDA (80x) or normalize EBITDA by adding back non-recurring charges, which would provide a more accurate picture of the company's valuation relative to its growth prospects. The negative net margin and the EPS miss versus raised guidance further complicate the use of P/E, making cash-flow-based metrics or EV/sales more reliable for this transitional period.