Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -19.5x · EV/EBITDA 4.9x · ROE -2.6%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $148M | $366M | $646M | $210M | $20M | $220M | $290M | $567M | $524M | $451M | $893M |
| Enterprise Value | $96M | $314M | $595M | $191M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | -19.48 | — | — | 0.30 | — | — | — | 6.54 | 34.29 | 285.83 | 35.07 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.60 | 1.51 | 2.68 | 1.27 | 0.08 | 1.92 | 3.21 | 1.27 | 1.19 | 1.06 | 1.99 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.36 | 0.89 | 1.57 | 0.48 | — | — | — | — | 2.76 | 1.56 | 14.80 |
| P/FCF | 6.86 | 130.85 | 11.86 | — | — | — | 6.13 | 4.38 | 3.85 | 3.60 | 7.55 |
| P/OCF | 17.64 | 43.62 | 10.72 | — | — | — | 5.24 | 3.95 | 3.49 | 3.25 | 6.69 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.29 | 2.47 | 1.16 | 4.40 | 10.81 | 13.12 | 3.29 | 3.11 | 3.09 | 3.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.93 | 13.07 | 25.99 | — | 28.57 | — | — | 7.26 | 7.07 | 6.86 | 8.37 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 0.26 | 81.26 | — | 12.94 | 9.31 | 8.62 | 3.78 | 10.73 |
| EV / FCF | — | 112.06 | 10.92 | — | — | — | 25.08 | 11.29 | 10.09 | 10.50 | 14.78 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 30.3% | 30.2% | 51.5% | 52.7% | 32.9% | 51.9% | 69.8% | 91.5% | 92.4% | 93.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.7% | -5.7% | -8.1% | -16.5% | 2.8% | -59.9% | -67.5% | 36.3% | 35.0% | 36.1% | 38.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.4% | -4.4% | -9.3% | 426.9% | -11.5% | -42.5% | -72.3% | 8.1% | 6.8% | 0.4% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.6% | -2.6% | -5.3% | 162.3% | — | — | — | 105.6% | 12.4% | 0.9% | 41.0% |
| ROA | -1.9% | -1.9% | -3.9% | 103.7% | -3.6% | -5.7% | -6.5% | 3.2% | 2.3% | 0.1% | 2.4% |
| ROIC | -2.9% | -2.9% | -3.8% | -4.0% | 0.8% | -8.1% | -6.5% | 13.3% | 10.6% | 11.2% | 14.2% |
| ROCE | -2.8% | -2.8% | -3.9% | -55.4% | 4.1% | -8.7% | -6.6% | 15.8% | 13.1% | 13.6% | 18.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | 4.87 | 3.19 | 15.33 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.06 | — | 29.72 | — | — | 4.72 | 4.76 | 4.82 | 4.43 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | 4.47 | 2.98 | 14.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.22 | — | 28.06 | — | — | 4.45 | 4.37 | 4.51 | 4.10 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -18.79 | -0.93 | — | — | — | 18.95 | 6.92 | 6.24 | 6.90 | 7.23 |
| Interest Coverage | -16.67 | -16.67 | -12.00 | 25.97 | 0.17 | -0.83 | 1.64 | 2.71 | 2.87 | 6.58 | 3.02 |
Net cash position: cash ($75M) exceeds total debt ($23M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.42 | 2.42 | 2.42 | 2.46 | 0.14 | 2.27 | 4.00 | 2.13 | 2.09 | 1.94 | 1.83 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.42 | 2.42 | 2.42 | 2.46 | 0.14 | 2.27 | 4.00 | 2.13 | 2.18 | 2.05 | 1.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.59 | 0.05 | 1.45 | 3.61 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.57 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 128.02 | 129.30 | 213.43 | 134.75 | 168.80 | 57.74 | 145.57 | 133.63 | 141.34 | 137.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.7% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 48.7% | 7.7% | 23.7% | 22.1% | 10.4% | 13.0% | 13.7% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 0.1% | — | — | — | 347.6% | 182.6% | 3668.8% | 481.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 336.1% | — | — | — | 15.3% | 2.9% | 0.3% | 2.9% |
| FCF Yield | 14.6% | 0.8% | 8.4% | — | — | — | 16.3% | 22.9% | 26.0% | 27.8% | 13.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 14.8% | 6.0% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 22.5% | 9.1% | 2.2% | 0.2% | 49.7% | 8.6% | 24.1% | 22.4% | 10.8% | 14.1% | 14.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $94M | $96M | $49M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $7M | $6M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NCMI stock.
National CineMedia, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -19.5x. The historical average is 34.0x.
National CineMedia, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.7x.
National CineMedia, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -2.6%. The historical average is 17.1%.
Based on historical data, National CineMedia, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -19.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
National CineMedia, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 7.66%.
National CineMedia, Inc. has 30.3% gross margin and -5.7% operating margin.
National CineMedia, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Seasonal cash flow volatility and losses
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trailing Losses Make Earnings Multiples Unusable
Based on reported figures, NCMI trades at a negative trailing P/E of -14.36 and an EV/EBITDA of 3.98, a discount to peers such as LAMR at 21.43x that reflects skepticism about earnings durability rather than a clear valuation anomaly.
The negative P/E signals that trailing net losses, not a multiple compression, drive the headline number, so the more informative anchor is EV/EBITDA, where the stock screens cheaply against the sector. However, a 3.98x EBITDA multiple paired with a 7.7% dividend yield and a 52.9x price-to-free-cash-flow ratio suggests the market is discounting the sustainability of the payout given volatile quarterly cash generation. Investors should monitor whether the discount narrows as seasonal cash flows normalize.
Margins Swing Too Widely to Gauge Earning Power
As reported in the quarterly income statements, NCMI's operating margin ranged from -79.1% to 25.5% over ten quarters, a spread so wide that no single period reliably represents underlying earning power.
Gross margin moved from 2.1% to 93.7%, which points to a cost structure where fixed overhead of roughly $20-24M per quarter is absorbed unevenly against highly seasonal revenue. The trailing net margin of -17.0% in 2026Q2 sits against a positive 31.4% in 2025Q4, and the gap between operating and net income in some quarters suggests non-operating items are materially influencing reported profit. Investors should treat the average across a full seasonal cycle, not any single quarter, as the more meaningful profitability reference.
Returns Oscillate Around Breakeven Without Compounding
Based on NCMI's reported figures, ROIC moved between -6.0% and 5.2% across ten quarters, with ROE sitting near breakeven in most periods, indicating the business has not yet demonstrated sustained capital compounding.
Returns track the timing of profitable fourth-quarter seasonal peaks rather than building steadily, which means the trailing averages are far more informative than the quarter-to-quarter prints. Compared with OUT's 4.9% ROIC and LAMR's 8.2%, NCMI's returns are in a similar low range, suggesting the gap is partly structural to the out-of-home advertising model. The absence of a clear upward trend warrants further investigation into whether operating leverage can lift returns.
Current Ratio Holds Up but Depends on Seasonal Cash
According to reported balance sheet figures, NCMI's current ratio held between 1.74 and 2.76, while cash declined to $43.1M in 2026Q2, a level that may tighten near-term buffers ahead of seasonal troughs.
A current ratio consistently above 1.7 indicates short-term obligations are covered on paper, yet the composition matters because much of the liquidity appears tied to deferred revenue and seasonal receivables rather than durable cash. Under a severe stress scenario with a weak advertising quarter, the current ratio would likely compress faster than the headline suggests. Investors should monitor cash trajectory into the next seasonal low.
Low Leverage Masks Operating Fragility
As reported in the balance sheet, NCMI's debt-to-equity of roughly 0.03 to 0.07 appears very conservative, yet the ratio may understate risk given recurring operating losses in six of ten quarters.
The bull case reads the low D/E and minimal debt near $22M as balance sheet strength, but this leverage metric is measured against equity that has been shrinking alongside retained earnings. A low debt load is less comforting when the business cannot reliably cover fixed costs from operations, and interest coverage is not meaningful given negative operating income in most periods. Using EBITDA-based leverage and free cash flow coverage would likely present a more cautious picture than the headline D/E suggests.