Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -148.8%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $50M | $81M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $23M | $43M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.16 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.82 | 0.97 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -148.8% | -148.8% | -2172.0% | -187.5% | -318.4% | — |
| ROA | -95.8% | -95.8% | -158.3% | -92.1% | -155.3% | -141.3% |
| ROIC | -139.2% | -139.2% | -345.8% | -113.4% | -92.5% | — |
| ROCE | -93.5% | -93.5% | -180.8% | -112.6% | -93.6% | -50.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | — | 2.03 | 0.37 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.46 | — | 0.06 | 0.18 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -136.93 | -136.93 | -12.64 | -11.75 | -70.30 | -2946.12 |
Net cash position: cash ($40M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.67 | 4.67 | 1.64 | 3.55 | 0.52 | 3.68 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.67 | 4.67 | 1.64 | 3.51 | 0.52 | 3.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.99 | 3.99 | 1.31 | 3.27 | 0.41 | 3.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 4.65 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $21M | $8M | $6M | $5M | $6M |
Pre-revenue development liquidity risk
According to recent financial data, NEXM trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.81, which suggests that the market is currently valuing the company at a discount to its reported asset base, likely reflecting the inherent uncertainty surrounding the rehabilitation of its legacy Botswana mining infrastructure.
The P/B ratio below parity indicates that investors are applying a significant haircut to the company's book value, potentially due to concerns regarding the recoverability of historical assets. This valuation suggests that the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to convert its inherited shafts and geological data into a profitable, modern mining operation without substantial additional capital dilution.
As reported in financial statements, NEXM's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -12.4% in 2026Q1, which underscores the company's current inability to generate returns on its invested capital while it remains in a pre-revenue, exploration-heavy phase of its project lifecycle.
The persistent negative ROIC trend, which saw a trough of -144.4% in 2025Q3, highlights the structural challenge of funding intensive drilling and infrastructure maintenance without offsetting revenue. Investors should monitor whether the company can improve these returns as it transitions from exploration to feasibility, as current levels suggest significant capital destruction relative to the scale of the project.
Based on reported figures, NEXM's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, dropping from 7.72 in 2026Q1 to lower levels in previous quarters, which indicates that while the company maintains a nominal liquidity cushion, its rapid cash burn rate necessitates frequent and potentially dilutive external financing rounds.
The high current ratio is somewhat misleading as it is heavily influenced by the timing of equity-funded cash injections rather than operational liquidity. The company's reliance on these cash balances to fund ongoing exploration suggests that its liquidity position is highly vulnerable to shifts in investor sentiment toward the battery metals sector.
According to recent SEC filings, NEXM maintains a minimal debt-to-equity ratio of 0.02 as of 2026Q1, which suggests that management has successfully avoided traditional debt obligations to preserve financial flexibility while the company lacks the operational cash flow required to service interest payments.
This low leverage profile is a strategic necessity for a pre-revenue developer, as it avoids the covenant risks associated with debt financing during the high-risk exploration phase. However, this reliance on equity-only funding implies that shareholders bear the full brunt of the company's capital-intensive development, which may limit the upside potential of future production success.
As indicated by the company's financial disclosures, the market commonly misapplies the 'resource grade' metric to NEXM, which obscures the true value of its inherited brownfield infrastructure that would otherwise require hundreds of millions of dollars to replicate from a greenfield starting point.
Focusing solely on mineral grades ignores the significant 'sunk cost' advantage provided by the existing Selebi and Selkirk shafts, which could materially shorten the timeline to production. Analysts should instead prioritize 'replacement cost' and 'infrastructure utility' metrics to better assess the company's competitive position relative to greenfield peers.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NEXM stock.
NexMetals Mining Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -1.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
NexMetals Mining Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -148.8%. The historical average is -218.2%.
Based on historical data, NexMetals Mining Corp. is trading at a P/E of -1.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.