Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -91.3%. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29M | $36M | $26M | $16M | $27M | $42M | $21M | $22M | $38M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $22M | $29M | $25M | $11M | $19M | $36M | $18M | $22M | $40M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -6.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.38 | 2.95 | 7.67 | 8.26 | 157.96 | 237.18 | 10.85 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.16 | 5.04 | 32.23 | 2.58 | 2.82 | 6.45 | 10.12 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.43 | 7.33 | 5.63 | 111.47 | 200.21 | 9.44 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.3% | 67.3% | 31.3% | 23.4% | -41.4% | -54.9% | 96.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -34.9% | -34.9% | -344.3% | -612.3% | -5860.2% | -5735.9% | -254.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -29.8% | -29.8% | -356.7% | -607.4% | -5842.0% | -5584.3% | -708.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -91.3% | -91.3% | -348.4% | -149.6% | -123.8% | -230.8% | -3292.4% | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -44.6% | -44.6% | -182.9% | -113.4% | -96.3% | -156.7% | -515.5% | -1805.1% | -2913.0% | -1004.7% | -12.6% |
| ROIC | -1621.1% | -1621.1% | -2431.1% | -650.2% | -931.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -72.6% | -72.6% | -251.3% | -149.2% | -121.7% | -223.1% | -840.7% | — | — | — | -40.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.64 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.89 | -1.46 | -0.82 | -0.83 | -1.00 | -1.31 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -9.79 | -9.79 | -52.79 | — | — | -3257.49 | -0.65 | -20.43 | — | -2.20 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($266806)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.44 | 4.44 | 2.09 | 4.08 | 3.93 | 6.17 | 1.76 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.47 | 3.47 | 0.90 | 3.12 | 3.70 | 6.09 | 1.76 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.85 | 2.85 | 0.66 | 2.97 | 3.60 | 5.84 | 1.71 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.77 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.12 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.40 | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.78 | 1.78 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.34 | 2.81 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.16 | 18.67 | — | 70.87 | 99.03 | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $902563 | $658754 | $467807 | $367226 | $281833 |
Capital dilution and liquidity
As reported in recent financial filings, NMTC trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.38, reflecting a market valuation that prioritizes the company's potential for future commercial scaling over its current lack of profitability and the inherent risks associated with its reliance on third-party distribution partners.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the company as a high-growth option rather than a mature medical device manufacturer. Given the absence of positive EBITDA or earnings, this valuation appears highly sensitive to the company's ability to maintain its 250% YoY revenue growth trajectory while simultaneously managing its cash burn.
Based on the company's reported figures, ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -53.8% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the capital deployed into the business is currently failing to generate economic returns as the firm continues to prioritize R&D and market entry over immediate profitability.
The persistent decay in return on invested capital highlights the difficulty of scaling a specialized thin-film manufacturing process within a high-fixed-cost environment. Investors should monitor whether future revenue growth from the ablation generator can eventually offset the heavy R&D and clinical trial expenditures that currently suppress capital efficiency.
According to quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 179 days in 2026Q2, which suggests that the company's reliance on distributor stocking orders creates substantial inefficiencies in managing inventory and collecting receivables compared to more vertically integrated medical device peers.
The high DIO and DSO figures indicate that the company's working capital is tied up in inventory and delayed payments, likely exacerbated by the distribution agreement with Zimmer Biomet. This lack of operational fluidity warrants further investigation into whether the company can optimize its supply chain as it moves toward higher-volume therapeutic product lines.
As indicated by the company's financial statements, the current ratio has declined from 7.13 in 2025Q3 to 4.37 in 2026Q2, signaling a tightening liquidity position that leaves the firm with limited room to maneuver should clinical trials or regulatory approvals face unexpected delays.
While the current ratio remains technically healthy, the absolute cash balance of approximately $6.5M against ongoing operating losses suggests a vulnerable liquidity profile. This necessitates a cautious outlook, as the company may be forced to seek dilutive financing to sustain its operations if revenue growth does not accelerate to self-funding levels.
Investors frequently misapply P/S multiples to NMTC, failing to account for the fact that distributor-driven revenue recognition can mask underlying end-user demand, thereby overstating the company's true commercial momentum and underestimating the risks associated with its reliance on a single primary distribution partner.
Using P/S as a primary valuation metric obscures the quality of revenue, which is heavily influenced by stocking orders rather than actual surgical procedures. A more appropriate metric would be a risk-adjusted valuation that discounts revenue based on the concentration of the Zimmer Biomet partnership and the company's limited cash runway.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NMTC stock.
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation's current P/E ratio is -6.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -91.3%. The historical average is -188.8%.
Based on historical data, NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation is trading at a P/E of -6.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation has 67.3% gross margin and -34.9% operating margin.