Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -271.4x · EV/EBITDA 47.4x · ROE -9.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $1.5B | $2.9B | $4.5B | $4.4B | $4.6B | $3.2B | $3.5B | $3.9B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.7B | $1.3B | $2.3B | $4.2B | $4.1B | $4.5B | $3.0B | $3.4B | $3.7B | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | -271.39 | — | 32.43 | 26.22 | 24.48 | 37.14 | 23.00 | 23.01 | 28.55 | 28.53 | 22.89 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.01 | 0.72 | 0.50 |
| P/B Ratio | 40.35 | 31.99 | 30.36 | 47.81 | 53.97 | — | 71.62 | 851.16 | 49.85 | 35.66 | 24.47 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 6.11 | 28.38 | 13.82 | 20.25 | 12.73 | 23.33 | 25.96 | 13.82 | 15.01 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 5.66 | 22.64 | 12.62 | 17.68 | 9.13 | 16.92 | 20.99 | 11.57 | 11.16 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 0.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 47.36 | 36.12 | 14.54 | 16.14 | 14.02 | 21.04 | 13.46 | 15.94 | 18.28 | 14.28 | 10.57 |
| EV / EBIT | — | 63.22 | 15.20 | 16.78 | 15.71 | 25.36 | 15.41 | 17.40 | 19.73 | 15.86 | 12.08 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 4.86 | 26.70 | 12.85 | 19.62 | 12.25 | 23.06 | 24.74 | 12.36 | 13.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.2% | 13.2% | 16.0% | 16.0% | 17.0% | 16.5% | 18.8% | 17.0% | 17.8% | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.1% | -0.1% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 4.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.1% | -0.1% | 1.4% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -9.8% | -9.8% | 95.3% | 195.1% | 451.2% | 585.9% | 573.5% | 369.6% | 188.1% | 133.1% | 56.6% |
| ROA | -0.3% | -0.3% | 3.9% | 8.2% | 9.5% | 7.4% | 9.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | 8.6% | 7.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -1.6% | -1.6% | 17.3% | 32.0% | 38.2% | 26.6% | 32.3% | 39.5% | 47.3% | 40.4% | 35.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 9.46 | 9.46 | 4.48 | 4.54 | 5.23 | — | 9.83 | 80.48 | 1.86 | 1.57 | 1.72 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 12.43 | 12.43 | 2.70 | 1.63 | 1.46 | 2.05 | 1.92 | 1.52 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -4.50 | -6.23 | -2.83 | -3.79 | — | -2.75 | -9.58 | -2.35 | -3.77 | -3.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -5.91 | -5.91 | -3.75 | -1.02 | -1.06 | -0.67 | -0.54 | -0.18 | -0.90 | -1.69 | -1.48 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -1.25 | -1.68 | -0.97 | -0.63 | -0.49 | -0.26 | -1.22 | -1.46 | -1.84 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.83 | 0.83 | 5.50 | 9.33 | 18.27 | 23.57 | 24.61 | 25.80 | 40.07 | 41.50 | 44.90 |
Net cash position: cash ($642M) exceeds total debt ($435M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.48 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 3.09 | 2.53 | 3.06 | 2.91 | 2.84 | 2.71 | 3.09 | 3.21 | 3.10 | 3.24 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 59.98 | 62.14 | 52.53 | 42.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.81 | 45.98 | 39.05 | 38.28 | 38.59 | 33.44 | 39.71 | 38.19 | 38.02 | 34.15 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.8% | 6.1% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 3.1% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 2.8% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 97.8% | 49.3% | 42.7% | 116.2% | 44.8% | 32.2% | 24.7% | 77.9% | 31.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 16.4% | 3.5% | 7.2% | 4.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 3.9% | 7.2% | 6.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | 1.3% | 2.1% | 2.9% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 3.1% | 5.8% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 11.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.9% | 7.4% | 5.2% | 4.8% | 3.4% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 7.2% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 13.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $38M | $38M | $38M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $40M | $41M | $41M | $42M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NSP stock.
Insperity, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -271.4x. The historical average is 29.9x.
Insperity, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 47.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.3x.
Insperity, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -9.8%. The historical average is 63.3%.
Based on historical data, Insperity, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -271.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Insperity, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.85%.
Insperity, Inc. has 13.2% gross margin and -0.1% operating margin.
Insperity, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 12.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent margin compression risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression at the Inflection Point
Gross margin fell to 13.2% in 2026Q2 from 19.1% in 2024Q1, while operating margin turned negative at -0.15% TTM, indicating benefit costs are outpacing pricing power. Based on quarterly data, this marks the lowest gross margin in the observed period.
The sequential deterioration in gross margin from 15.4% in 2026Q1 to 13.2% in 2026Q2 suggests that medical benefit costs and pass-through expenses are rising faster than service fees. Operating margin swung from +6.0% in 2024Q1 to -0.15% TTM, implying that SG&A overhead has not flexed downward with revenue growth. The negative net margin of -0.10% indicates that the company is currently unable to fully pass through cost increases, a trend that warrants close monitoring for any reversal in the benefit cost cycle.
Return on Equity Eroding as Losses Persist
ROE swung from 67.5% in 2024Q1 to -49.6% in 2025Q4, with TTM ROE at -9.8%, reflecting equity erosion from $140M to $61M. As reported in the balance sheet, retained earnings fell $164M over the period.
The extreme volatility in ROE, ranging from +67.5% to -49.6%, is driven by a shrinking equity base rather than operational efficiency. With equity down 56% since 2024Q1, the negative TTM ROE suggests that the company is not generating sufficient returns to sustain its capital base. The absence of ROIC data for most quarters limits a full decomposition, but the negative operating margins imply that returns on invested capital are likely below the cost of capital, a condition that may persist until margin recovery takes hold.
Working Capital Swings Mask Underlying Efficiency
Cash conversion cycle rose to 49 days in 2026Q2, up from 36 days in 2024Q1, driven by DSO of 47 days and minimal DPO. According to the cash flow statement, working capital changes ranged from -$540M to +$618M, indicating significant timing distortions.
The CCC expansion from 36 to 49 days suggests that receivables are taking longer to collect, possibly reflecting slower-paying SMB clients or a shift in client mix. However, the near-zero DPO and DIO indicate that the company has little leverage over suppliers, consistent with a pass-through business model. The extreme working capital swings, driven by payroll and benefit timing, obscure the underlying efficiency; investors should focus on the trend in DSO and the stability of the CCC rather than quarter-to-quarter fluctuations.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Shrinks
Debt-to-equity rose from 3.04 in 2024Q1 to 7.84 in 2026Q2, while interest coverage turned negative at -0.17 in 2026Q2. Based on the balance sheet, total debt increased to $478M as equity contracted to $61M.
The rising D/E ratio is more a function of equity erosion than aggressive borrowing, as total debt increased only modestly from $425M to $478M. However, the negative interest coverage in 2026Q2 indicates that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expense, a condition that could strain liquidity if it persists. The elevated D/EBITDA of 29.88 in 2026Q2, though distorted by negative EBITDA, suggests that leverage is becoming less comfortable relative to earnings power.
Liquidity Buffer Holds Despite Operational Losses
Current ratio improved to 1.11 in 2026Q2, with cash at $619M, up from $441M a year earlier. As reported in the balance sheet, the quick ratio of 1.10 indicates minimal inventory dependence, but client funds may inflate the cash position.
The current ratio has remained above 1.0 throughout the observed period, suggesting adequate short-term liquidity even as losses mounted. However, the cash balance likely includes client payroll and tax funds held in a fiduciary capacity, which may overstate the true corporate liquidity buffer. The negative operating cash flow in several quarters, such as -$443M in 2025Q1, highlights the volatility of cash generation, but the current ratio suggests the company can meet near-term obligations.
Gross Margin Misapplied as a Profitability Gauge
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Insperity is gross margin, which appears low at 13.2% but is distorted by pass-through payroll and benefit costs. According to the income statement, gross profit per worksite employee is a more accurate measure of service value.
Analysts often compare Insperity's gross margin to software companies, but the PEO model reports revenue on a gross basis, including pass-through costs. This makes gross margin structurally lower and not directly comparable to asset-light HCM providers. Instead, investors should evaluate gross profit per worksite employee or net revenue (service fees only) to assess true pricing power and margin trends. The recent decline in gross margin from 19.1% to 13.2% may reflect rising benefit costs, but without adjusting for pass-through, the magnitude of the deterioration is overstated.