Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 55.2x · EV/EBITDA 7.1x · ROE 5.0%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.1B | $6.2B | $5.2B | $5.6B | $7.0B | $6.6B | $5.1B | $5.6B | $3.7B | $3.6B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.6B | $12.8B | $11.8B | $12.6B | $13.8B | $13.9B | $12.7B | $13.9B | $7.6B | $7.8B | $4.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 55.19 | 67.68 | 7.38 | 16.23 | 7.24 | 7.95 | 6.29 | 24.43 | 9.58 | 7.77 | 21.90 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.02 | 1.26 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 1.13 | 1.85 | 1.35 | 1.47 | 1.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.47 | 3.02 | 2.28 | 2.43 | 2.54 | 2.32 | 2.01 | 2.74 | 1.99 | 2.26 | 7.05 |
| P/FCF | 6.81 | 8.39 | 4.69 | 6.61 | 5.65 | 6.24 | 4.92 | 25.55 | 5.91 | 97.68 | 7.94 |
| P/OCF | 5.67 | 7.00 | 4.14 | 5.62 | 5.01 | 5.47 | 4.07 | 13.46 | 5.06 | 32.80 | 7.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.59 | 2.19 | 2.55 | 2.65 | 2.99 | 2.81 | 4.57 | 2.73 | 3.22 | 3.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.06 | 7.77 | 5.71 | 7.64 | 7.01 | 7.88 | 6.52 | 13.05 | 7.01 | 9.30 | 10.45 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.48 | 24.22 | 8.45 | 14.86 | 8.90 | 10.11 | 8.79 | 20.48 | 10.03 | 16.21 | 13.70 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.25 | 10.72 | 14.82 | 11.10 | 13.07 | 12.20 | 63.10 | 12.00 | 213.62 | 16.88 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 39.0% | 58.9% | 56.9% | 61.5% | 59.9% | 61.8% | 55.6% | 59.6% | 57.4% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.4% | 17.4% | 23.5% | 14.4% | 25.2% | 25.3% | 30.6% | 21.6% | 27.4% | 21.3% | 26.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.2% | 2.2% | 13.4% | 7.0% | 18.6% | 17.9% | 18.0% | 7.6% | 14.1% | 19.5% | 8.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 31.5% | 13.6% | 34.5% | 30.9% | 35.4% | 11.7% | 22.6% | 50.9% | 49.4% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 6.1% | 2.8% | 7.5% | 6.3% | 5.9% | 2.2% | 5.4% | 9.1% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 7.4% | 7.4% | 10.4% | 5.6% | 10.0% | 8.7% | 10.1% | 6.1% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 10.6% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 11.6% | 6.2% | 10.8% | 9.3% | 10.7% | 6.7% | 11.3% | 10.8% | 12.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.33 | 3.33 | 3.00 | 3.08 | 2.53 | 2.61 | 3.04 | 4.14 | 2.13 | 2.76 | 8.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.16 | 4.16 | 3.28 | 4.32 | 3.55 | 4.23 | 3.97 | 7.98 | 3.69 | 5.18 | 5.75 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.19 | 2.94 | 3.02 | 2.45 | 2.54 | 2.98 | 4.02 | 2.05 | 2.69 | 7.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.99 | 3.99 | 3.21 | 4.23 | 3.44 | 4.12 | 3.89 | 7.76 | 3.56 | 5.04 | 5.53 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.85 | 6.04 | 8.22 | 5.46 | 6.83 | 7.28 | 37.56 | 6.08 | 115.94 | 8.93 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.40 | 1.40 | 3.16 | 1.90 | 4.61 | 4.86 | 4.29 | 2.23 | 3.41 | 2.00 | 2.68 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.66 | 1.53 | 1.81 | 1.79 | 1.66 | 1.43 | 1.90 | 1.57 | 1.92 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.66 | 1.53 | 1.81 | 1.79 | 1.66 | 1.43 | 1.84 | 1.47 | 1.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.46 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.37 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 49.31 | 14.42 | 9.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 79.28 | 69.40 | 81.02 | 75.65 | 80.18 | 73.37 | 106.15 | 72.20 | 84.49 | 72.15 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 2.7% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 155.0% | 155.0% | 30.3% | 55.2% | 14.6% | 14.1% | 12.4% | 36.0% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 32.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 1.5% | 13.6% | 6.2% | 13.8% | 12.6% | 15.9% | 4.1% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 14.7% | 11.9% | 21.3% | 15.1% | 17.7% | 16.0% | 20.3% | 3.9% | 16.9% | 1.0% | 12.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.4% | 1.9% | 11.6% | 10.8% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 1.4% | 2.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.7% | 4.6% | 15.8% | 14.2% | 14.5% | 9.9% | 7.5% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 4.3% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $33M | $36M | $40M | $44M | $47M | $48M | $47M | $46M | $32M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NXST stock.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 55.2x. The historical average is 17.5x. This places it at the 92th percentile of its historical range.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.0x.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.0%. The historical average is 16.0%.
Based on historical data, Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 55.2x. This is at the 92th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.32% with a payout ratio of 155.0%.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. has 39.0% gross margin and 17.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Debt surge from TEGNA acquisition
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Cyclicality
Gross margin swung from 64.7% in 2026Q2 to 37.2% in 2025Q3, reflecting political cycle and acquisition mix shifts. According to recent SEC filings, operating margin fell to 11.8% in 2026Q2 from 28.0% in 2024Q4, indicating limited operating leverage off-cycle.
The wide swings in gross margin are not purely operational; they reflect the biennial political advertising surge and the integration of TEGNA's lower-margin distribution revenue. Operating margin compression from 28.0% in 2024Q4 to 11.8% in 2026Q2 suggests that fixed costs, including programming and SG&A, are not scaling down proportionally in off-election periods. This implies that the company's true earning power is better measured on a normalized, ex-political basis, where margins likely stabilize in the mid-teens, as suggested by the 17.44% TTM operating margin.
ROIC Decay Post-Acquisition
ROIC has declined from 3.5% in 2024Q4 to 1.9% in 2026Q2, while ROE fell from 10.7% to 5.4% over the same period. Based on reported figures, the TEGNA acquisition has temporarily depressed returns on invested capital.
The drop in ROIC and ROE is largely a function of the massive debt-funded TEGNA acquisition, which expanded the capital base faster than earnings. The 2024Q4 peak reflects election-year profits, while subsequent quarters show a normalization to sub-2% ROIC. This suggests that the company is not currently compounding returns on capital, but rather absorbing integration costs and higher interest expenses. Investors should monitor whether management can restore ROIC to pre-acquisition levels as synergies materialize, or if the enlarged asset base permanently dilutes returns.
Working Capital Efficiency Stable
DSO has ranged from 48 to 88 days over the last ten quarters, with the most recent quarter at 48 days, while DPO has hovered between 14 and 29 days. As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle remains negative, indicating favorable working capital dynamics.
The negative cash conversion cycle, driven by low DIO and moderate DPO, suggests that Nexstar collects cash from advertisers and distributors before paying its suppliers, a structural advantage of the broadcast model. The recent DSO improvement to 48 days in 2026Q2 from 88 days in 2026Q1 may reflect better collection timing or a shift in revenue mix toward distribution fees, which are typically collected more promptly. However, the volatility in DSO warrants monitoring, as it could indicate timing effects from political advertising or acquisition-related receivables.
Leverage Spikes to Record Highs
Debt-to-equity surged to 5.39 in 2026Q2 from 2.92 in 2025Q3, while D/EBITDA reached 23.24, far exceeding peer averages. According to recent SEC filings, interest coverage fell to 1.93, indicating reduced debt service comfort.
The TEGNA acquisition added approximately $5.2 billion in debt, pushing leverage to levels that are significantly higher than peers like TEGNA (D/E 0.82) and Gray (D/E 2.07). The D/EBITDA of 23.24 is distorted by depressed EBITDA in the off-political quarter, but even on a normalized basis, leverage appears elevated. Interest coverage of 1.93 in 2026Q2 is thin, suggesting that a modest decline in cash flows could strain debt service. This leverage is the primary balance sheet risk, and investors should monitor the company's ability to deleverage through free cash flow generation.
Liquidity Ratios Mask Cash Constraints
Current ratio improved to 1.56 in 2026Q2, but cash balances fell to $218 million, the lowest in the series. Based on reported figures, the liquidity position appears adequate on paper but may be tighter than the ratio suggests.
The current ratio of 1.56 is above 1.0, indicating that current assets cover current liabilities, but the sharp decline in cash to $218 million from over $1 billion in prior quarters raises concerns about near-term liquidity. The quick ratio, which excludes inventory, is identical to the current ratio, suggesting that inventory is not a significant component of current assets. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged advertising downturn, the company's ability to service its $12.1 billion debt load could be challenged, given the thin interest coverage and high leverage.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 63.19 is distorted by depressed TTM net income, while the forward P/E of 5.66 reflects expected recovery. As reported in financial statements, EV/EBITDA of 7.50 is a more reliable valuation metric for this capital-intensive, cyclical business.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Nexstar is the trailing P/E, which is artificially inflated by the off-political cycle's low net income. Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA, which at 7.50 is below the peer average and more accurately captures the company's cash-generating ability. Additionally, the forward P/E of 5.66 suggests the market is pricing in a significant earnings rebound, likely driven by political advertising in 2026. However, this multiple may be misleading if the market is overestimating the sustainability of political revenue or underestimating the structural decline in linear subscribers. A normalized earnings power approach, adjusting for political cycles and acquisition integration costs, would provide a clearer valuation picture.