Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA 5.5x · ROE -9.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $793M | $2.3B | $1.7B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $2.8B | $3.7B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.0B | $6.5B | $6.1B | $6.6B | $6.6B | $6.0B | $6.5B | $6.9B | $7.6B | $8.4B | $7.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.66 | — | — | — | 4.51 | 12.94 | 7.58 | — | 10.84 | 20.15 | 13.60 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.55 | 1.57 | 1.39 | 1.45 | 1.72 | 2.33 | 4.71 | 3.28 | 2.76 | 3.49 | 6.01 |
| P/FCF | — | 13.49 | — | 19.49 | — | 6.67 | 12.94 | — | 10.96 | 13.04 | 9.54 |
| P/OCF | 1.32 | 3.78 | 3.43 | 3.10 | 17.11 | 2.81 | 4.13 | 4.57 | 3.53 | 5.06 | 3.77 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.01 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 1.11 | 1.23 | 1.14 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.49 | 5.80 | 6.08 | 5.07 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 5.96 | 5.90 | 6.34 | 8.29 | 7.08 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.95 | 22.28 | 16.41 | 16.05 | 6.30 | 11.00 | 10.47 | 137.20 | 14.17 | 15.55 | 12.21 |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.73 | — | 50.51 | — | 20.86 | 44.31 | — | 29.90 | 30.15 | 25.83 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 17.3% | 16.0% | 21.1% | 17.7% | 17.2% | 16.0% | 17.5% | 18.7% | 16.5% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 9.9% | 8.0% | 11.4% | 8.5% | 8.5% | — | 9.9% | 10.3% | 7.7% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.0% | -2.0% | -1.6% | -1.4% | 8.5% | 2.3% | 4.1% | -6.0% | 3.7% | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -9.7% | -9.7% | -7.2% | -6.3% | 49.6% | 24.3% | 51.6% | -50.7% | 25.0% | 23.7% | 36.2% |
| ROA | -1.4% | -1.4% | -1.2% | -1.1% | 6.5% | 1.7% | 2.7% | -4.1% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 8.4% | 8.4% | 6.8% | 10.8% | 8.4% | 8.2% | — | 8.7% | 9.1% | 7.1% | 8.1% |
| ROCE | 9.3% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 11.6% | 8.5% | 7.7% | — | 8.8% | 9.5% | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.46 | 3.46 | 4.30 | 2.84 | 3.09 | 5.83 | 12.82 | 9.86 | 5.27 | 5.05 | 11.29 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.46 | 4.46 | 5.15 | 3.82 | 4.54 | 5.13 | 4.73 | 4.78 | 4.44 | 5.19 | 4.92 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.93 | 3.69 | 2.31 | 2.58 | 4.96 | 11.42 | 8.88 | 4.76 | 4.58 | 10.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.78 | 3.78 | 4.42 | 3.11 | 3.79 | 4.36 | 4.22 | 4.31 | 4.01 | 4.71 | 4.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 25.24 | — | 31.02 | — | 14.19 | 31.36 | — | 18.94 | 17.11 | 16.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.11 | 1.20 | 4.37 | 2.54 | 2.33 | 0.16 | 2.06 | 2.03 | 2.31 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.15 | 1.23 | 1.10 | 1.36 | 1.21 | 1.25 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.31 | 5.31 | 5.70 | 5.24 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.09 | 5.29 | 5.50 | 5.54 | 5.58 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 34.14 | 31.97 | 34.47 | 40.46 | 39.73 | 37.33 | 33.88 | 29.14 | 35.23 | 31.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | 1.7% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | 7.7% | 13.2% | — | 9.2% | 5.0% | 7.4% |
| FCF Yield | — | 7.4% | — | 5.1% | — | 15.0% | 7.7% | — | 9.1% | 7.7% | 10.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.0% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 0.2% | 2.3% | 5.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 0.6% | 3.9% | 5.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $154M | $155M | $155M | $159M | $160M | $159M | $155M | $162M | $165M | $163M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OI stock.
O-I Glass, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.7x. The historical average is 18.9x.
O-I Glass, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.0x.
O-I Glass, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -9.7%. The historical average is 6.2%.
Based on historical data, O-I Glass, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
O-I Glass, Inc. has 17.3% gross margin and 9.9% operating margin.
O-I Glass, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Structural ROIC decay with leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Sub-2% ROIC Signals Capital Destruction
O-I Glass has posted ROIC between 0.9% and 2.3% across all ten reported quarters, never once approaching its estimated cost of capital, which per company filings fell from 2.3% in Q3 2025 to just 1.4% in Q3 2026, confirming a multi-year pattern of value erosion rather than creation.
This sustained sub-2% ROIC, viewed alongside gross margin compression from 18.1% to 12.0% over the same ten-quarter window, indicates the return shortfall is driven by both margin erosion and an asset base (turnover of 0.16–0.20x) that is too heavy for the revenue it generates. The Q2 2026 goodwill impairment reduced the book capital base, which could mechanically improve ROIC, but the underlying operating income is declining too quickly for any accounting benefit to materialize meaningfully. Investors should monitor whether the Fit to Win program can restore ROIC above 3% in the Americas while the Europe segment stabilizes, though the current trajectory offers no evidence of inflection.
Deep Value Discount or Earnings Mirage
O-I Glass trades at 0.68x book value and 4.66x EV/EBITDA, a substantial discount to packaging peers like AptarGroup at 11.51x and Sealed Air at 14.33x, yet the forward P/E of 13.75 versus a negative TTM P/E of -7.65 signals the market has priced in a recovery that current fundamentals do not yet support.
The P/B of 0.68x implies the market believes book equity is impaired, which the $920 million goodwill write-down between Q1 and Q3 2026 partially validates, but the equity base itself has been distorted by that same impairment, making P/B an unreliable anchor in either direction. The EV/EBITDA of 4.66x appearing cheap against peers must be contextualized by the forward multiple expanding to 5.65x, which suggests consensus expects EBITDA to decline, not grow, making the apparent discount partially illusory. The 0.15x P/S is strikingly low even for a capital-intensive packaging business and likely reflects the market pricing in further European restructuring or margin deterioration that has not yet been fully disclosed.
Debt-to-Equity Near 4x Amid Earnings Collapse
O-I Glass reported Debt/Equity of 3.71x in Q3 2026, which jumped to 9.25x in Q2 2026 when the equity base collapsed to just $383 million, compared to peer Silgan at 2.03x and AptarGroup at 0.56x, placing O-I among the most levered names in the sector on any reasonable measure.
Interest coverage has oscillated between -0.58x and 2.20x over ten quarters, dipping negative in Q4 2024 and Q1 2026, which suggests the company has periodically generated insufficient EBIT to cover its interest expense and may have relied on cash reserves or asset sales to bridge the gap. The equity rebound from $383 million in Q2 2026 to approximately $1.3 billion in Q3 2026, with zero retained earnings as reported, appears to reflect an accounting reclassification or OCI recovery rather than fundamental earnings improvement, meaning the headline D/E of 3.71x may still understate true economic leverage. With total debt near $4.9 billion against $379 million in cash and only $100 million of quarterly operating income, investors should scrutinize the maturity ladder and covenant headroom closely.
Working Capital Masks Operating Weakness
O-I Glass maintains a cash conversion cycle of 31–42 days that appears stable, but this masks a critical dynamic: DPO of 67–83 days consistently exceeds DSO of 38–50 days, indicating the company is extending supplier payment terms to fund operations rather than generating genuine cash from its own receivables cycle.
Asset turnover of just 0.16–0.20x, while expected for a furnace-intensive manufacturer, confirms that O-I's revenue generation per dollar of assets is structurally low and has not improved over ten quarters, meaning every incremental dollar of fixed costs absorbed by declining revenue amplifies operating deleverage. The DPO extension from 70 to 83 days between Q3 2025 and Q4 2025, before partially normalizing, may reflect negotiation leverage with suppliers or a deliberate cash preservation tactic, both of which carry sustainability risks if supplier confidence erodes. When combined with the cash flow analysis showing cumulative operating cash flows driven primarily by working capital swings rather than operational earnings, this ratio profile suggests the reported FCF margin of 10.2% in Q3 2026 may be temporarily inflated by inventory drawdowns rather than structural efficiency gains.
EV/EBITDA Fails for Impaired Industrials
EV/EBITDA is the most commonly misapplied ratio for O-I Glass at 4.66x because it ignores the $972 million non-cash impairment embedded in recent results, understates the true debt burden when equity is near zero, and fails to account for the $118–128 million in quarterly depreciation that may include deferred furnace maintenance rather than genuine asset consumption.
A more appropriate analytical framework for O-I Glass would focus on EV/EBITDA minus maintenance CapEx, or on net debt to operating cash flow, both of which would reveal a significantly higher effective multiple than 4.66x suggests. The standard EV/EBITDA approach also obscures the capital intensity problem: with CapEx declining from $136M per quarter to effectively zero, the reported EBITDA improvement may come at the cost of deferred furnace relining, meaning maintenance CapEx is being borrowed from future periods. For a business where furnaces require periodic capital reinvestment of $30–50 million each, the true free cash flow yield after normalized maintenance CapEx is materially lower than the headline 5.87x P/FCF would imply, and investors relying solely on the EV/EBITDA discount are likely understating the capital reinvestment required to sustain current operations.