Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -92.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -8.7%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $922M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $989M | $700M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -92.59 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.65 | 3.54 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.18 | 4.01 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 71.53 | 54.46 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 66.35 | 50.52 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.69 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.35 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 65.7% | 60.6% | 57.0% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | -4.6% | -25.7% | -53.8% | -81.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.9% | -4.9% | -27.8% | -55.0% | -81.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -8.7% | -8.7% | -57.6% | -53.0% | -46.6% |
| ROA | -5.6% | -5.6% | -28.9% | -34.0% | -32.7% |
| ROIC | -68.9% | -68.9% | -202.8% | -307.9% | — |
| ROCE | -7.3% | -7.3% | -38.3% | -41.4% | -38.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.97 | -0.71 | -0.86 | -0.88 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -13.11 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -4.04 | -4.04 | -9.46 | -13.35 | -16.26 |
Net cash position: cash ($222M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.60 | 3.60 | 2.10 | 3.26 | 5.46 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.54 | 3.54 | 2.03 | 3.18 | 5.36 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.93 | 2.93 | 1.42 | 2.64 | 4.87 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.85 | 1.13 | 0.70 | 0.40 |
| Inventory Turnover | 19.90 | 19.90 | 20.30 | 14.61 | 13.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 48.51 | 51.42 | 48.87 | 47.75 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.4% | 1.8% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $56M | $56M | $56M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OMDA stock.
Omada Health's current P/E ratio is -92.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Omada Health's return on equity (ROE) is -8.7%. The historical average is -41.5%.
Based on historical data, Omada Health is trading at a P/E of -92.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Omada Health has 65.7% gross margin and -4.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
GLP-1 disruption and margin sustainability
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Inflection Points to Scalability
According to the latest quarterly data, Omada's gross margin expanded to 72.6% in Q2 2026 from 62.4% in Q1, while operating margin turned positive at 4.0%, signaling a potential inflection toward sustainable profitability.
The sequential gross margin improvement of over 10 percentage points suggests a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin programs and improved cost management, though it remains below pure SaaS peers due to the human-in-the-loop coaching model. Operating margin swung from -6.1% to +4.0% in one quarter, indicating that revenue growth is now outpacing expense growth, but the sustainability of this margin is unproven given the volatility in prior quarters. Net margin of 6.0% in Q2 2026 is partly driven by non-cash items, as stock-based compensation exceeded net income, so investors should monitor cash-based profitability metrics.
Return on Capital Shows Volatile Recovery
Based on reported figures, Omada's ROIC swung from -97.5% in Q1 2025 to 10.0% in Q2 2026, while ROE turned positive at 2.2%, suggesting a dramatic but fragile recovery in capital efficiency.
The extreme volatility in ROIC, ranging from -97.5% to 18.7% over the past year, reflects the company's transition from heavy investment phase to early profitability, but the small positive ROIC of 10.0% is still below the cost of capital for a high-risk healthcare tech firm. ROE of 2.2% is modest and largely driven by a recent equity raise that expanded the capital base, not by retained earnings, as accumulated deficits exceed equity. The improvement in returns appears to be driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, given asset turnover remains low at 0.28, indicating that the business model requires significant capital to generate revenue.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves Sharply
As reported in the latest financial statements, Omada's cash conversion cycle improved to 27 days in Q2 2026 from 166 days in Q1 2025, driven by a dramatic reduction in DSO from 194 to 50 days, indicating better collections and working capital management.
The sharp decline in DSO from 194 days in Q1 2025 to 50 days in Q2 2026 suggests that the company has resolved prior billing or collection issues, possibly due to more standardized contracts with enterprise clients. DPO has also increased from 76 to 38 days, but the net effect is a much shorter cash conversion cycle, which reduces the need for external financing. However, the volatility in working capital metrics across quarters—such as CCC swinging from 38 to 27 days recently—indicates that these improvements may not be linear, and investors should monitor whether the company can sustain this efficiency as it scales.
Debt-Free Balance Sheet Enhances Flexibility
Omada's balance sheet shows zero debt as of Q2 2026, with interest coverage of 379.14, according to the latest data, providing substantial financial flexibility to fund growth without refinancing risk.
The elimination of debt, following the repayment of a $30M facility, positions the company with a clean capital structure, which is unusual for a high-growth healthcare tech firm. Interest coverage of 379.14 is not meaningful in the absence of debt, but it underscores that the company has no near-term debt service obligations. The $222M cash pile, combined with zero debt, suggests that the company can fund operations and potential M&A without dilutive equity raises, though the accumulated deficit of -$454M indicates that the equity base is entirely from external capital.
Ample Liquidity Cushions Operational Risks
Omada's current ratio stands at 3.91 and quick ratio at 3.85 in Q2 2026, according to the latest balance sheet data, indicating a strong liquidity position that can cover over two years of operating expenses.
The high current and quick ratios, driven by a $221.7M cash balance, provide a robust buffer against operational volatility, including potential delays in at-risk revenue recognition or unexpected cash burn. However, the company's cumulative operating cash flow over the past ten quarters was -$8.9M, suggesting that the cash pile is being consumed, albeit at a slowing pace. The liquidity position appears adequate to weather a severe downturn, but the reliance on external capital raises to build this cushion means that future dilution risk remains if cash burn accelerates.
P/S Multiple Misleads on Profitability
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Omada is the price-to-sales multiple, which at 5.49 appears reasonable for a 53% grower, but obscures the fact that the company is barely profitable and generates thin cash flows.
P/S is often used for high-growth companies, but for Omada, it fails to capture the capital intensity of the human-in-the-loop model and the volatility in margins. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Revenue adjusted for the cash pile, or forward EV/EBITDA, which would better reflect the company's path to profitability. Given that net income is positive but SBC exceeds it, investors should also consider price-to-cash earnings or a normalized earnings figure that excludes non-cash charges. The P/S ratio also ignores the potential impact of GLP-1 drugs on the company's core business, which could compress revenue growth and margins.