Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -14.2x · EV/EBITDA 11.9x · ROE -4.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $393M | $551M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $900M |
| Enterprise Value | $949M | $1.1B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $2.3B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $985M |
| P/E Ratio → | -14.16 | — | 14.29 | 25.17 | 11.50 | 10.40 | — | 17.14 | 19.61 | 20.36 | 17.17 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 1.35 | 1.20 | 1.44 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 0.88 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 2.13 | 2.73 | 3.43 | 2.69 | 2.67 | 2.22 | 2.72 | 3.08 | 2.39 |
| P/FCF | 34.78 | 48.77 | 22.19 | 8.99 | 24.14 | 8.22 | 19.69 | 13.89 | 21.93 | 16.60 | 13.02 |
| P/OCF | 3.29 | 4.61 | 6.84 | 6.26 | 15.17 | 6.90 | 12.90 | 9.63 | 13.50 | 11.18 | 7.59 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.75 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.64 | 1.38 | 1.76 | 1.30 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 0.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.88 | 13.87 | 9.45 | 12.82 | 8.67 | 7.70 | — | 10.92 | 9.81 | 10.63 | 7.46 |
| EV / EBIT | 68.16 | 79.52 | 14.84 | 22.96 | 10.56 | 9.56 | — | 15.62 | 14.41 | 15.87 | 10.96 |
| EV / FCF | — | 97.88 | 29.55 | 10.93 | 29.27 | 9.52 | 23.96 | 17.32 | 22.01 | 17.09 | 14.25 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 56.3% | 62.9% | 63.4% | 63.0% | 61.8% | 55.4% | 57.4% | 57.5% | 56.4% | 57.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 15.5% | 14.5% | -8.5% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.9% | -1.9% | 6.1% | 3.9% | 11.7% | 11.5% | -12.8% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.9% | -4.9% | 15.7% | 10.9% | 31.2% | 28.8% | -20.5% | 13.6% | 14.6% | 16.2% | 14.8% |
| ROA | -2.1% | -2.1% | 7.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | 14.4% | -10.1% | 7.8% | 9.3% | 9.4% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | 1.0% | 1.0% | 9.1% | 6.6% | 19.5% | 18.2% | -6.5% | 10.8% | 14.3% | 13.9% | 16.2% |
| ROCE | 1.3% | 1.3% | 12.5% | 9.1% | 26.5% | 23.6% | -8.3% | 13.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | 17.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.06 | 7.06 | 2.40 | 2.33 | 1.55 | 1.27 | — | 2.55 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.69 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.08 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.43 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.96 | 6.96 | 2.35 | 2.27 | 1.52 | 1.05 | — | 2.16 | 0.04 | 0.31 | 0.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 49.11 | 7.35 | 1.94 | 5.13 | 1.30 | 4.28 | 3.43 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 1.23 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.03 | 2.03 | 48.23 | 13.42 | 71.75 | 175.32 | -61.07 | 75.24 | 39.68 | 27.66 | 26.27 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.18 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.77 | 1.32 | 1.62 | 1.90 | 1.75 | 1.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 1.25 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.93 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.43 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.87 | 1.09 | 1.52 | 1.55 | 1.49 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.91 | 3.91 | 3.36 | 3.61 | 2.37 | 3.70 | 2.70 | 3.14 | 2.93 | 3.73 | 3.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 18.02 | 18.71 | 19.26 | 16.40 | 17.35 | 23.59 | 19.09 | 22.75 | 22.70 | 20.80 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 10.7% | 7.6% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 46.5% | 68.7% | 21.3% | 21.0% | — | 36.8% | 34.8% | 27.9% | 34.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 7.0% | 4.0% | 8.7% | 9.6% | — | 5.8% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.8% |
| FCF Yield | 2.9% | 2.1% | 4.5% | 11.1% | 4.1% | 12.2% | 5.1% | 7.2% | 4.6% | 6.0% | 7.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 14.0% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 5.0% | 0.6% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 24.7% | 17.7% | 3.3% | 4.7% | 6.8% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OXM stock.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -14.2x. The historical average is 17.0x.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.6x.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.9%. The historical average is 10.7%.
Based on historical data, Oxford Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -14.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 10.69%.
Oxford Industries, Inc. has 56.3% gross margin and 0.9% operating margin.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Volatile profitability from margin swings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value Discount to Peers
OXM trades at a steep discount to peers with a 0.86x P/B and 0.30x P/S, yet its 9.5% dividend yield, as reported in current market data, suggests significant market skepticism about the sustainability of its earnings and capital allocation.
The forward P/E of 13.29 implies the market anticipates a meaningful earnings recovery, but the trailing P/E is meaningless due to recent losses. The P/B of 0.86 is far below Ralph Lauren's 7.35, indicating investors are pricing in substantial future equity erosion or low returns on capital. This discount appears to reflect the balance sheet stress and operational volatility documented in prior analyses, not just cyclicality.
Erratic Margins Obscure Core Earning Power
Gross margin volatility is extreme, swinging from 52.5% to 73.8% in consecutive quarters, with the Q2 2026 operating margin of 15.6% representing a sharp reversal from a -27.7% loss in Q3 2025, as shown in reported financials.
The erratic gross margin pattern suggests unpredictable promotional activity, channel mix shifts, or accounting timing, making it difficult to assess sustainable profitability. The sudden Q2 2026 improvement, coinciding with a drop in reported SG&A, appears more indicative of a non-recurring accounting event than a fundamental operational turn, warranting deep skepticism about its repeatability.
Capital Returns Underperform Cost of Capital
ROIC has been volatile and mostly depressed, reaching only 4.2% in Q2 2026 after a deep trough of -5.8% in Q3 2025, indicating the company is struggling to generate returns above its estimated cost of capital based on reported figures.
The negative ROIC in several recent quarters confirms the prior finding of destructive operating leverage and SG&A burden overwhelming gross profit. Even the most recent positive quarters show ROIC well below historical levels and peer benchmarks like Ralph Lauren's 24.7%, suggesting a structural impairment to the company's capital efficiency and competitive position.
Leverage Rising as a Financial Crutch
The Debt-to-Equity ratio has climbed to 0.93 as of Q2 2026, while interest coverage remains highly volatile at 41.41x after swinging from negative levels, a pattern suggesting debt accumulation may be funding unprofitable operations rather than growth.
The rising leverage in the context of shrinking equity and erratic earnings indicates a potentially self-reinforcing negative cycle. The high Q2 2026 interest coverage is likely a temporary artifact of the quarter's singular profitability spike and should not be mistaken for sustainable debt-service capacity, especially with a minimal cash buffer.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Amidst Volatility
The quick ratio of 0.56 in Q2 2026 signals immediate liquidity is dependent on inventory, which represents 130 days of sales, creating vulnerability if operational performance falters again.
While the current ratio of 1.17 appears adequate, the composition is concerning. The high inventory level relative to payables (DPO of 82 days) means the company is funding a significant portion of its working capital internally. A repeat of the Q3 2025 loss scenario would severely test this thin liquidity position, as highlighted by the critically low cash reserves.
Dividend Yield Masks Capital Erosion
The 9.5% dividend yield is the most commonly misapplied metric to this business model, as it obscures the fact that sustained payout in the face of erratic and negative cash flows may accelerate equity erosion rather than signal value.
Investors often mistake a high yield for a sign of safety or value, but in OXM's case, with retained earnings declining by over $80 million since Q4 2024, the dividend appears unsustainable without further leveraging the balance sheet. The yield is a function of a collapsing share price due to operational distress, not a reflection of secure, recurring income, and the payout policy warrants immediate scrutiny.