Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.2x · EV/EBITDA 3.4x · ROE -10.3%. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $107M | $266M | $145M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $191M | $350M | $223M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.19 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.60 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.43 | — |
| P/FCF | 3.66 | 9.08 | 31.87 | — |
| P/OCF | 3.23 | 8.01 | 13.50 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.81 | 0.93 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.43 | 6.27 | 16.49 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.64 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.94 | 49.08 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 7.9% | 19.2% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 3.8% | -3.3% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.8% | -7.8% | -3.5% | 5.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.3% | -10.3% | -5.0% | 1838.8% |
| ROA | -6.8% | -6.8% | -3.3% | 162.8% |
| ROIC | 3.0% | 3.0% | -2.8% | — |
| ROCE | 3.8% | 3.8% | -3.5% | 2660.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.76 | 6.92 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.27 | 0.23 | -1.18 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.50 | 1.50 | 5.78 | -0.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.86 | 17.21 | -0.04 |
| Interest Coverage | -5.21 | -5.21 | -2.01 | 10.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.29 | 0.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.26 | 0.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.90 | 0.47 | 30.89 |
| Inventory Turnover | 231.32 | 231.32 | 143.45 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 35.88 | 61.54 | 0.09 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 27.3% | 11.0% | 3.1% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $28M | $18M | $24M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PAL stock.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock's current P/E ratio is -3.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock's current EV/EBITDA is 3.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.4x.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock's return on equity (ROE) is -10.3%. The historical average is -7.6%.
Based on historical data, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock is trading at a P/E of -3.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock has 7.9% gross margin and 3.8% operating margin.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical Automotive Demand Exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Speculative Pricing Amidst Operational Uncertainty
As reported in financial statements, PAL's forward P/E of 69.54 suggests that the market is pricing in significant future earnings recovery, yet the current negative TTM P/E of -5.94 highlights the disconnect between current operational losses and the optimistic growth narrative surrounding this newly consolidated logistics entity.
The valuation multiples appear to be highly sensitive to the company's ability to transition from a roll-up phase to a profitable operating model. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E compresses as the company demonstrates consistent earnings, or if the current premium reflects an overestimation of the moat provided by its specialized fleet.
Capital Efficiency Remains Severely Impaired
Based on the provided financial data, PAL's ROIC has fluctuated wildly, reaching a negative 15.0% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying rather than compounding value as it struggles to integrate its fragmented asset base into a cohesive, high-return logistics platform.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the capital invested in the 615-unit fleet is not yet generating sufficient throughput to cover the associated depreciation and integration costs. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company can achieve positive returns on capital as the integration of the five founding entities matures.
Working Capital Volatility Hinders Performance
According to recent quarterly filings, PAL's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.20, suggesting that the company is failing to optimize its specialized fleet utilization compared to industry peers who typically maintain higher turnover rates in the competitive finished vehicle logistics market.
The lack of improvement in asset turnover implies that the company may be suffering from operational friction, such as high empty-mile ratios or inefficient dispatch systems. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these metrics to demonstrate that the consolidation of these five entities has actually created a more efficient network.
Liquidity Buffers Facing Rapid Erosion
As indicated by the company's reported figures, the current ratio has declined from 1.36 in 2024Q2 to 1.06 in 2026Q1, signaling that the company's ability to cover short-term obligations is tightening as it continues to burn cash to sustain its ongoing operational and integration requirements.
The narrowing liquidity buffer leaves the company with little margin for error should the automotive production cycle experience a downturn. This trend suggests that the company may face increased pressure to secure additional financing if it cannot reach cash-flow neutrality in the near term.
Misapplication of Standard Logistics Multiples
Based on an analysis of the business model, the most commonly misapplied metric for PAL is the standard EV/EBITDA multiple, which obscures the significant impact of non-recurring integration costs and the heavy depreciation associated with the company's specialized, asset-heavy stinger-steered fleet of transport vehicles.
Using standard logistics multiples fails to account for the unique 'roll-up' nature of the company, where historical EBITDA is heavily distorted by the costs of consolidating five distinct entities. Analysts should instead focus on normalized free cash flow and unit-level economics to better gauge the true earning power of the business.