Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.3%. (2025–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-93977784 | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.46 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.10 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.06 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 11.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | -4.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.6% | -2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.3% | -2.3% |
| ROA | -1.9% | -1.9% |
| ROIC | -79.2% | -79.2% |
| ROCE | -3.8% | -3.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.96 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($110M) exceeds total debt ($7M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.19 | 7.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.69 | 6.69 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.58 | 6.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.98 | 9.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M |
Capital depletion via losses
According to recent financial data, the company trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.10, which, when coupled with a negative TTM P/E of -2.46, suggests that the market is heavily discounting the firm's future earnings potential due to persistent operational losses and lack of profitability.
The extremely low P/B ratio of 0.06 indicates that the market assigns almost no value to the company's book equity, likely reflecting investor skepticism regarding the quality of the asset base. This valuation profile suggests that the market views the current business model as fundamentally impaired rather than merely cyclical.
As reported in the 2026Q1 financial statements, the company's gross margin of 10.7% and negative operating margin of 10.2% highlight a structural inability to generate positive returns, suggesting that the firm's core operations are currently incapable of covering basic overhead costs without further capital erosion.
The net margin of -7.1% confirms that the company is failing to achieve the scale necessary for profitability. Investors should monitor whether management can implement cost-cutting measures, as the current margin profile appears unsustainable for long-term operational viability.
Based on the 2026Q1 reported figures, the company's days inventory outstanding reached 144 days, which, when compared to industry standards, suggests significant inefficiencies in inventory management and a potential over-accumulation of stock that ties up critical liquidity within the firm's balance sheet.
The high DIO relative to the low asset turnover of 0.20 indicates that the company is struggling to convert its inventory into revenue effectively. This inefficiency appears to be a primary driver of the firm's negative cash flow, as capital remains trapped in slow-moving assets.
According to the 2026Q1 balance sheet, the company maintains a current ratio of 6.91, which provides a temporary liquidity cushion, yet this figure may be misleading as it does not account for the ongoing cash burn required to sustain the firm's current operational trajectory.
While the quick ratio of 6.37 suggests the company can meet short-term obligations, the reliance on existing cash reserves to fund operations is not a permanent solution. The lack of positive cash flow generation warrants further investigation into how long these reserves can sustain the current business model.
Investors frequently misapply the current ratio as a measure of health for this business model, but as shown in the 2026Q1 data, a high ratio of 6.91 obscures the underlying cash burn and the structural inability of the firm to generate positive operating cash flow.
The current ratio is a poor proxy for solvency here because it ignores the rapid depletion of cash through operating losses. A more appropriate metric would be the cash burn rate relative to total liquidity, which would provide a clearer picture of the company's remaining runway.
Includes 30+ ratios · 1 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PEW-WT stock.
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. WT's current P/E ratio is -2.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. WT's return on equity (ROE) is -2.3%. The historical average is -2.3%.
Based on historical data, GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. WT is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. WT has 11.7% gross margin and -4.5% operating margin.