Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.5x · EV/EBITDA 6.6x · ROE 8.2%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.2B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $1.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.9B | $3.2B | $2.7B | $1.9B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.45 | 19.35 | 27.37 | 13.96 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.41 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.51 | 1.58 | 1.37 | 0.75 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 11.77 | 13.37 | 10.63 | 14.24 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 7.09 | 8.06 | 7.01 | 5.69 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.55 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.58 | 7.27 | 6.11 | 3.51 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 10.26 | 11.38 | 9.50 | 7.34 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.89 | 13.39 | 19.23 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 20.9% | 21.3% | 19.8% | 21.6% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 8.0% | 8.4% | 10.7% | 9.4% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2.3% | 2.9% | 7.8% | 4.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 4.6% | 5.8% | 15.6% | 8.9% |
| ROA | 3.4% | 3.4% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 6.3% | 3.6% |
| ROIC | 9.6% | 9.6% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 9.2% | 6.2% |
| ROCE | 9.9% | 9.9% | 10.0% | 13.0% | 10.7% | 7.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.35 | 1.58 | 2.33 | 2.72 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.53 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.26 | 0.91 | 1.81 | 2.11 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.52 | 2.76 | 4.99 | 4.47 | 882.00 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.44 | 3.44 | 2.89 | 4.68 | 13.39 | 6.47 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.90 | 1.68 | 1.40 | 1.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.44 | 1.25 | 1.01 | 1.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.83 | 5.83 | 6.03 | 5.77 | 5.72 | 6.12 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 84.25 | 87.63 | 106.16 | 97.36 | 102.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.8% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.6% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 32.3% | 32.3% | 55.7% | 22.5% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.4% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 7.2% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.5% | 7.5% | 9.4% | 7.0% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 9.1% | 8.0% | 9.8% | 1.7% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.9% | 9.7% | 11.9% | 3.3% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $40M | $45M | $47M | $47M | $47M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PHIN stock.
PHINIA Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 18.5x. The historical average is 20.2x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
PHINIA Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.6x.
PHINIA Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.2%. The historical average is 8.6%.
Based on historical data, PHINIA Inc. is trading at a P/E of 18.5x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PHINIA Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.75% with a payout ratio of 32.3%.
PHINIA Inc. has 20.9% gross margin and 8.0% operating margin.
PHINIA Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue sustainability and margin volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Forward Earnings Signal
PHIN trades at 22.99x trailing earnings but only 12.45x forward, implying the market expects substantial earnings growth. According to recent financial data, EV/EBITDA of 7.82 is below the peer average, suggesting undervaluation relative to peers.
The steep discount between trailing and forward P/E suggests the market is pricing in a significant earnings rebound, likely from margin expansion and operational leverage. With EV/EBITDA at 7.82 versus peers like DAN at 11.98 and THRM at 11.31, PHIN appears cheaper on an enterprise basis, but this may reflect higher perceived risk or lower growth quality. Investors should monitor whether the forward earnings estimates are achievable given the historical volatility in margins and revenue.
Margin Expansion with Earnings Quality Concerns
Gross margin improved to 23.0% in 2026Q2 from 21.4% in 2026Q1, as reported in financial statements, while operating margin rose to 9.4%. However, net margin of 4.3% remains thin, and prior earnings were boosted by one-time items.
The sequential improvement in gross and operating margins indicates better cost control and pricing power, but the net margin is still below the peer average of around 5-10% for profitable peers like DORM. The prior income statement analysis noted a $12M negative SBC adjustment in 2026Q2, which may have inflated reported EPS, suggesting that underlying profitability is weaker than headline numbers. Investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of earning power, as it excludes non-operating items and better reflects core business performance.
Subdued Returns on Invested Capital
ROIC has hovered between 2.2% and 3.0% over the past ten quarters, as per financial statements, indicating limited value creation relative to capital employed. ROE similarly remains in the low single digits, averaging around 1.8%.
The consistently low ROIC suggests that PHIN is not generating sufficient returns on its invested capital, which may be due to a combination of thin margins and a large asset base. While the company has been returning cash to shareholders, the lack of improvement in ROIC over time implies that growth is not translating into higher returns. This could be a concern for long-term value creation, especially if the company continues to invest in assets that yield below its cost of capital.
Working Capital Efficiency Improving
Cash conversion cycle improved from 89 days in 2024Q1 to 75 days in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, driven by faster collection of receivables and better inventory management. Asset turnover remains low at 0.25.
The reduction in DSO from 108 to 81 days and DIO from 67 to 61 days indicates improved working capital management, which has contributed to stronger cash flow. However, asset turnover of 0.25 is low, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the auto parts industry. The company appears to be managing its working capital more efficiently, but the overall asset base remains heavy, which may limit returns on capital.
Leverage Creeping Higher with Coverage Adequate
Debt-to-equity rose from 0.46 in 2024Q1 to 0.66 in 2026Q2, as per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 4.19x in 2026Q2 from 1.95x in 2025Q3. D/EBITDA remains elevated at 7.96.
The increase in leverage is modest but persistent, and the D/EBITDA ratio of 7.96 is high, indicating that debt levels are substantial relative to earnings. Interest coverage of 4.19x provides a comfortable cushion for now, but the prior balance sheet analysis noted that goodwill increased to $509M, which could be at risk of impairment. If earnings decline, the coverage could deteriorate quickly, making the company more vulnerable to refinancing risk. Investors should monitor the trajectory of debt and EBITDA closely.
Adequate Liquidity with Shrinking Cash Buffer
Current ratio stands at 1.81 and quick ratio at 1.34, as reported in financial statements, indicating sufficient short-term coverage. However, cash declined from $484M in 2024Q4 to $370M in 2026Q2.
The current and quick ratios suggest that PHIN can meet its short-term obligations, but the declining cash balance and rising debt levels indicate a tightening liquidity position. The company has been returning significant cash to shareholders, which may be limiting its ability to build a larger cash cushion. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp drop in revenue, the current ratio could fall below 1.5, potentially straining liquidity. Investors should watch whether the company can maintain its shareholder returns while preserving adequate liquidity.
Misapplied P/E in Cyclical Downturn
The trailing P/E of 22.99 is misleading for PHIN due to depressed earnings in a cyclical trough, as per financial data. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 7.82 better reflects the company's operating performance.
In cyclical industries like auto parts, trailing P/E can be artificially high when earnings are at a low point, making the stock appear expensive. PHIN's forward P/E of 12.45 suggests the market expects a recovery, but this may not materialize if the industry remains weak. EV/EBITDA is a more reliable valuation metric as it is less affected by non-cash items and capital structure differences. Investors should also consider the price-to-sales ratio of 0.79, which indicates the market is valuing the company at a discount to its revenue generation, possibly due to concerns about long-term growth and margin sustainability.