Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 6.9%. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $258M | $185M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $258M | $185M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.04 | 30.76 | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.08 | 1.06 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.9% | 6.9% | — |
| ROA | 6.6% | 6.6% | -0.0% |
| ROIC | -0.9% | -0.9% | — |
| ROCE | -1.1% | -1.1% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.00 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.92 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($296249) exceeds total debt ($250000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 3.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $24M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PLMK stock.
Plum Acquisition Corp. IV's current P/E ratio is 0.0x. The historical average is 30.8x.
Plum Acquisition Corp. IV's return on equity (ROE) is 6.9%. The historical average is 6.9%.
Based on historical data, Plum Acquisition Corp. IV is trading at a P/E of 0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidation and deal failure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Speculative Valuation Lacks Fundamental Anchor
As reported in recent financial filings, PLMK trades at a P/E of 31.35, a metric that appears largely disconnected from the company's pre-revenue status and suggests that market participants are pricing the vehicle based on speculative merger potential rather than any underlying operational earnings or cash flow generation.
The current P/E ratio is essentially a reflection of non-operating interest income rather than business performance, rendering traditional valuation multiples largely irrelevant for this entity. Investors should monitor whether the premium over the trust value persists as the liquidation deadline approaches and the probability of a successful business combination fluctuates.
Liquidity Constraints Threaten Operational Runway
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio has deteriorated significantly from 4.09 in 2025Q1 to 0.43 in 2026Q1, indicating that the entity's ability to cover its short-term administrative obligations is becoming increasingly strained as the search for a target acquisition continues to consume available cash reserves.
The rapid decline in the current ratio highlights the structural risk inherent in a SPAC that lacks an active revenue stream to offset ongoing compliance and administrative costs. This trend suggests that management may soon face a binary choice between securing a merger or requiring additional capital injections from the sponsor to avoid insolvency.
Capital Efficiency Remains Structurally Negative
According to quarterly data, PLMK's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -70.4% in 2024Q3, which underscores the inherent difficulty of generating positive returns on invested capital while the vehicle remains in a pre-revenue, cash-consuming search phase prior to any potential business combination.
The negative ROIC is a direct consequence of the company's cost-center structure, where administrative expenses are incurred without any corresponding operational income. This metric will only become meaningful once the company successfully merges with an operating entity and begins to deploy capital toward revenue-generating activities.
Misapplied Metrics Obscure SPAC Reality
As indicated by the financial data, the use of P/E ratios to evaluate PLMK is fundamentally flawed, as it obscures the reality that the company is a pre-revenue vehicle where earnings are driven by non-operating interest income rather than the core business performance of an underlying operating entity.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'trust value per share' and the 'cash burn rate' to assess the vehicle's true financial health and the sponsor's ability to preserve capital. Relying on traditional profitability metrics for a SPAC risks misinterpreting accounting noise as evidence of operational success or failure.