Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -331.4%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6M | $18M | $23M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | $16M | $16M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.28 | 0.82 | 0.95 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.50 | 9.54 | 3.01 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.74 | 0.64 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | 48.5% | 37.8% | 37.4% | 30.1% | 30.3% | 34.3% |
| Operating Margin | -64.2% | -64.2% | -31.4% | -36.8% | -61.9% | -64.8% | -29.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -74.1% | -74.1% | -35.7% | -44.0% | -74.0% | -63.0% | -32.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -331.4% | -331.4% | -481.6% | — | — | -1686.3% | — |
| ROA | -122.9% | -122.9% | -77.8% | -115.6% | -135.0% | -90.1% | -94.2% |
| ROIC | -24345.9% | -24345.9% | -512.1% | -291.3% | -341.3% | -245.7% | — |
| ROCE | -285.5% | -285.5% | -417.8% | — | — | -1687.2% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.37 | 2.37 | 0.02 | — | — | 2.55 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.95 | -1.00 | — | — | -0.03 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -6.74 | -6.74 | -5.85 | -4.69 | -7.31 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($6M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 2.48 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 1.20 | 0.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 | 2.02 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.89 | 0.30 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.65 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.80 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.61 | 1.94 | 2.39 | 2.05 | 0.97 | 2.93 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.07 | 7.07 | 6.82 | 6.49 | 6.15 | 2.82 | 3.62 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 25.45 | 15.46 | 21.34 | 13.69 | 19.64 | 8.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $7M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $16M |
High fixed cost burn
As reported in financial statements, PMNT's operating margin reached -64.16% in certain periods, demonstrating that the company's fixed cost base, particularly SG&A, is currently too large to be supported by the existing revenue scale, leading to significant operating deleveraging during off-peak quarters.
The wide spread between gross margins, which have fluctuated near 48.5%, and negative operating margins suggests that the brand's marketing-heavy cost structure is not yet optimized for its current revenue volume. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve the necessary scale to cover these fixed expenses, as the current trajectory implies significant value destruction.
Based on the company's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle remains highly volatile, with DIO reaching as high as 1,293 days in 2026Q2, reflecting the inherent difficulty in managing inventory and receivables within a seasonal luxury apparel model that lacks consistent year-round demand.
The extreme fluctuations in days inventory outstanding suggest that the company may be struggling with aged stock, which poses a persistent risk of future markdowns and gross margin compression. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a structural drag on cash flow, necessitating further investigation into inventory turnover policies.
According to recent SEC filings, PMNT maintains a current ratio of 1.19, which, while technically above parity, masks a precarious cash position of only $1.6M that appears insufficient to support the company's high fixed-cost structure during off-peak seasonal periods.
The company's liquidity position appears vulnerable to any disruption in the seasonal revenue cycle, as the current cash balance provides little buffer against sustained operating losses. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional financing, as the current liquidity profile may limit management's strategic flexibility.
Based on EDBL's reported figures, the market's reliance on P/S multiples for PMNT is likely misleading, as it obscures the company's inability to convert revenue into positive operating cash flow, thereby ignoring the fundamental risk of a high-fixed-cost business model in a cyclical industry.
Using P/S ratios to value a loss-making, high-burn enterprise like PMNT fails to account for the quality of earnings and the sustainability of the current cost structure. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted EBITDA or a cash-burn-to-runway analysis, which would better reflect the company's actual financial health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PMNT stock.
Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock's current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock's return on equity (ROE) is -331.4%. The historical average is -406.5%.
Based on historical data, Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock has 48.5% gross margin and -64.2% operating margin.