Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -74.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.2%. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $61M | $85M | $99M | $395M | $22M | $14M | $3775 | $1051 |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $952M | $1.5B | $62M | $89M | $83M | $380M | $24M | $16M | $3775 | $-79813 |
| P/E Ratio → | -74.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 2693.14 | 2474.62 | 4165.50 | 169.90 | 621.36 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 14.48 | 0.89 | 1.30 | 6.14 | 27.07 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1395.33 | 3957.01 | 171.87 | 657.03 | — | — | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -546.66 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.31 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.23 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.8% | 9.8% | 30.0% | 45.3% | 55.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | -7489.3% | -7489.3% | -6953.6% | -7330.4% | -21062.5% | — | — | — | — | — | -0.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2738.1% | -2738.1% | -18375.9% | -7548.0% | -19101.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 6.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.2% | -2.2% | -77.9% | -40.4% | -63.9% | -181.3% | -420.6% | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -2.1% | -2.1% | -60.1% | -35.4% | -54.2% | -171.4% | -320.9% | -819.5% | -553.8% | — | 55.2% |
| ROIC | -8.6% | -8.6% | -39.3% | -28.2% | -61.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -5.8% | -5.8% | -23.7% | -36.6% | -63.6% | -111.3% | -294.9% | — | -2422.7% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.46 | -0.72 | 0.01 | 0.07 | -1.03 | -1.03 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -553.86 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.23 |
| Interest Coverage | -286.29 | -286.29 | -26.46 | -15.87 | -32.65 | -60.65 | -3.12 | -0.43 | -1.57 | — | 7.78 |
Net cash position: cash ($738M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 102.38 | 102.38 | 17.36 | 0.55 | 1.19 | 15.91 | 21.98 | 0.04 | 0.54 | — | 0.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 102.34 | 102.34 | 17.36 | 0.54 | 1.19 | 15.91 | 21.98 | 0.04 | 0.54 | — | 0.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 100.89 | 100.89 | 17.32 | 0.43 | 1.16 | 15.47 | 21.92 | 0.03 | 0.53 | — | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 8.51 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.75 | 1.75 | 14.50 | 2.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.50 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2222.65 | 26.42 | 350.73 | 34.89 | — | — | — | — | — | 17.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21000.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32948.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $164M | $94M | $67M | $56M | $29M | $28M | $7M | $5M | $943735 | $350498 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying QUBT stock.
Quantum Computing, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -74.4x. The historical average is 0.0x.
Quantum Computing, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -2.2%. The historical average is -131.0%.
Based on historical data, Quantum Computing, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -74.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Quantum Computing, Inc. has 9.8% gross margin and -7489.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn vs. revenue
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Collapse Masks Hardware Pivot
Gross margin swung from 42.6% in 2025Q2 to -21.0% in 2026Q2, while operating margin worsened to -4.1%, per quarterly filings, indicating the hardware pivot is consuming cash faster than revenue scales.
The reported gross margin deterioration from positive territory to -21.0% in 2026Q2 suggests that the shift toward nanophotonic hardware has introduced significant COGS, likely from low-yield fabrication or third-party component costs. Operating margin of -4.1% in 2026Q2, though improved from -112.2% in 2025Q4, still reflects a cost structure where R&D and SG&A outpace the $5.6M quarterly revenue base. This implies that the company's earning power is entirely dependent on future productization, and current margins provide no evidence of a scalable path to profitability.
Capital Efficiency Decays Despite Equity Infusion
ROIC has remained deeply negative, improving from -14.6% in 2025Q1 to -1.2% in 2026Q2, but the improvement is driven by a massive equity base rather than operational gains, as reported in financial statements.
The ROIC trend from -14.6% to -1.2% appears to show improvement, but this is largely a denominator effect: total assets surged to $1.6B by 2026Q2, diluting the negative returns. The underlying operating losses of $23M in 2026Q2 against a $1.6B capital base imply that the company is not compounding returns but rather spreading losses over a larger equity cushion. This suggests that capital allocation has prioritized fundraising over operational efficiency, and investors should monitor whether the hardware pivot can generate positive incremental returns on the substantial invested capital.
Working Capital Cycle Signals Scaling Pains
The cash conversion cycle swung from -7,656 days in 2024Q1 to 266 days in 2026Q2, per quarterly data, reflecting a dramatic shift from negative to positive working capital requirements as inventory and receivables build.
The CCC transition from deeply negative to positive 266 days indicates that QUBT is now funding its operations through its own working capital rather than supplier credit, a reversal from earlier periods where DPO exceeded 8,000 days. DSO of 197 days in 2026Q2 suggests that revenue recognition is tied to slow-paying government contracts or pilot programs, while DIO of 115 days reflects inventory build-up for hardware production. This implies that the company's cash conversion is deteriorating as it scales, and the efficiency gains from supplier leverage are no longer available, warranting close monitoring of receivables collectability.
Near-Zero Debt Masks Equity Dilution Risk
Debt-to-equity remains at 0.01 with total debt of $23.4M against $1.6B equity, per the latest balance sheet, indicating minimal leverage but heavy reliance on equity financing to fund operations.
The absence of meaningful debt suggests that QUBT has not faced covenant or refinancing pressure, but this is a double-edged sword: the company has funded its $23M quarterly operating losses through equity raises, which have diluted shareholders. Interest coverage of -978.42 in 2026Q2 reflects negligible interest expense relative to operating losses, but the real risk is not debt service but the sustainability of equity issuance. If the reported cash of $189.2M in 2026Q2 is accurate, the runway appears adequate, but the reliance on equity markets for future funding could become a constraint if investor sentiment shifts.
Cash Buffer Provides Extended Runway
The current ratio stands at 53.13 in 2026Q2, with cash of $189.2M against a $16.5M quarterly FCF burn, implying a 11-quarter runway, as reported in the balance sheet and cash flow statement.
The liquidity position appears exceptionally strong, with a current ratio of 53.13 and quick ratio of 52.44, indicating that current assets vastly exceed current liabilities. However, this liquidity is a function of the massive equity raises rather than operational cash generation, and the cash balance has already declined from $737.9M in 2025Q4 to $189.2M in 2026Q2, a 74% drawdown in two quarters. This suggests that while the company can weather near-term stress, the burn rate is accelerating, and the liquidity buffer could erode quickly if revenue growth does not materially improve.
P/S Multiple Misleads on Quantum Value
The price-to-sales ratio of 2,979.58, based on TTM revenue of $682K, is commonly misapplied to QUBT, as it implies a software-like valuation while the company is pivoting to capital-intensive hardware, per reported figures.
The P/S multiple is the most misapplied ratio for QUBT because it treats the company as a scalable software business, but the shift to nanophotonic hardware introduces significant capital intensity and manufacturing costs that a revenue multiple does not capture. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Invested Capital or a price-to-book ratio, which at 0.93 suggests the market is valuing the company below its asset base, potentially reflecting skepticism about the hardware's commercial viability. Investors should instead focus on cash burn per revenue dollar and the trajectory of gross margins, as these better reflect the company's ability to transition from a research-stage entity to a commercial hardware provider.