Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.9x · ROE N/A. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3M | $84M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4.5B | $4.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.12 | 3.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.01 | 0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.93 | 6.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 12.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 182.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.3% | 34.3% | 35.0% | 33.8% | 30.5% | 34.3% | 34.5% | 33.9% | 34.5% | 34.7% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 3.9% | -8.1% | 5.4% | -16.9% | 7.7% | 11.1% | 1.4% | 9.4% | 10.0% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -26.4% | -26.4% | -12.9% | -1.3% | -21.4% | 2.4% | 8.4% | -3.4% | 6.5% | 23.5% | 11.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -28.6% | -147.8% | 10.1% | 27.5% | -8.5% | 11.6% | 32.5% | 24.1% |
| ROA | -28.9% | -28.9% | -12.5% | -1.2% | -18.0% | 2.0% | 7.0% | -2.6% | 4.4% | 12.7% | 8.4% |
| ROIC | 10.2% | 10.2% | -13.3% | 7.7% | -19.4% | 8.1% | 10.4% | 1.1% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 7.1% |
| ROCE | 9.5% | 9.5% | -10.6% | 6.5% | -19.0% | 9.0% | 12.3% | 1.4% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 7.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 12.18 | 13.09 | 2.44 | 2.01 | 1.61 | 1.28 | 0.85 | 1.29 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.54 | 8.54 | — | 5.97 | — | 4.49 | 3.51 | 10.13 | 3.76 | 4.84 | 3.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 9.89 | 10.66 | 2.25 | 1.64 | 1.36 | 1.17 | 0.76 | 1.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.92 | 5.92 | — | 4.85 | — | 4.13 | 2.87 | 8.53 | 3.43 | 4.32 | 3.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 178.92 | 16.13 | 8.39 | — | 8.44 | 2.86 | 8.17 | 7.83 | 6.19 | 4.99 |
| Interest Coverage | -4.21 | -4.21 | 1.47 | 1.16 | 1.30 | 3.10 | 3.58 | 3.61 | 3.32 | 3.96 | 4.01 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 1.21 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 1.21 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.21 | 1.09 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 0.74 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.24 | 6.24 | 6.15 | 6.93 | 6.25 | 5.69 | 7.14 | 6.30 | 6.25 | 4.81 | 7.14 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.13 | 41.57 | 43.74 | 43.54 | 52.06 | 51.11 | 55.76 | 47.60 | 60.55 | 43.54 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 31.8% | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 147.9% | 104.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 29.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 31.8% | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $9M | $9M | $9M |
Secular linear television decline
As reported in recent financial data, QVCGA trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 5.93x, a figure that reflects the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to stabilize its core retail operations as the linear television landscape continues to experience a secular and persistent contraction in reach.
The current valuation appears to be pricing in a terminal decline rather than a turnaround, as evidenced by the lack of a meaningful forward P/E and a deeply negative net margin. Investors should monitor whether the 31.8% dividend yield is a signal of market distress or a genuine attempt to return capital, though the latter seems unlikely given the company's negative equity position.
Based on the company's reported figures, ROIC has experienced extreme volatility, swinging from a positive 3.6% in 2025Q4 to a negative 49.9% in 2025Q2, which underscores the difficulty management faces in generating efficient returns on capital within a high-fixed-cost broadcasting and retail business model.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that capital allocation is being heavily influenced by non-recurring impairment charges rather than operational efficiency. The inability to maintain a consistent, positive ROIC indicates that the company's core assets are struggling to produce value above their cost of capital, warranting further investigation into the sustainability of current operations.
According to quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 50 days in 2025Q4, which highlights the company's ongoing struggle to balance inventory levels against the logistical demands of a high-return-rate business model in a period of declining consumer discretionary spending.
The variability in DSO and DIO suggests that the company is attempting to optimize its working capital to preserve liquidity, yet the underlying asset turnover remains low at 0.35x. This indicates that the company's infrastructure is becoming increasingly inefficient as it fails to generate sufficient revenue relative to its asset base.
As indicated by the financial statements, the interest coverage ratio has remained precarious, hovering near 0.91x in 2025Q4, which suggests that the company's ability to service its debt obligations is increasingly reliant on cash reserves rather than consistent operating income generated from its core retail segments.
The high debt-to-EBITDA levels, which reached 33.22x in 2025Q4, indicate that the company's leverage is significantly constrained by its declining profitability. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance upcoming maturities, as the current interest coverage profile appears insufficient to support the existing debt load without further restructuring.
The most commonly misapplied metric for QVCGA is the P/E ratio, which fails to account for the significant non-cash goodwill impairments that frequently distort net income, making the company appear more distressed than its underlying cash-generative potential might suggest to a casual observer of the headline figures.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or free cash flow metrics to better understand the company's operational health, as these measures are less sensitive to the accounting noise created by restructuring and impairment charges. Relying on P/E in this context obscures the reality that the company is currently being valued as a credit-recovery play rather than a traditional retail entity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying QVCGA stock.
QVC Group Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
QVC Group Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.0x.
Based on historical data, QVC Group Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
QVC Group Inc.'s current dividend yield is 31.85%.
QVC Group Inc. has 34.3% gross margin and 3.9% operating margin.
QVC Group Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.