Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 7.9%. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $175M | $120M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $175M | $119M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.03 | 41.68 | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 596.16 | 568.34 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.9% | 7.9% | -0.0% |
| ROA | 3.6% | 3.6% | -0.0% |
| ROIC | -1.2% | -1.2% | — |
| ROCE | -0.7% | -0.7% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.49 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -4.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($313322) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.02 | 2.02 | 3.83 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.02 | 2.02 | 3.83 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.52 | 1.52 | 3.34 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 2.4% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $15M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RANG stock.
Range Capital Acquisition Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 0.0x. The historical average is 41.7x.
Range Capital Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.9%. The historical average is 4.0%.
Based on historical data, Range Capital Acquisition Corp. is trading at a P/E of 0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidation and deal failure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Speculative Premium Amidst Operational Void
Based on reported figures, RANG trades at a P/E of 42.72, a valuation multiple that appears disconnected from its lack of commercial operations and suggests investors are pricing in a high-risk, binary outcome rather than any underlying fundamental earnings power or sustainable growth trajectory.
The elevated P/E ratio is likely an artifact of non-cash accounting adjustments rather than a reflection of market-implied growth. Investors should monitor whether this premium persists as the company approaches its liquidation deadline, as the lack of a target makes traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant.
Capital Erosion Undermines Future Returns
According to recent SEC filings, the company's ROIC has deteriorated to -153.3% in 2026Q1, illustrating that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value as it consumes its limited capital base to fund administrative overhead without generating any offsetting returns from business combinations.
The negative return on capital is a direct consequence of the high fixed costs associated with maintaining a public shell entity. This trend warrants further investigation, as it suggests that the longer the search for a target continues, the more the initial investment is eroded by compliance-related expenses.
Critical Depletion of Operating Runway
As reported in financial statements, the company's liquidity position has reached a precarious state, with cash reserves falling to $4,400 in 2026Q1, which appears insufficient to cover the ongoing legal and administrative costs required to sustain the firm's search for a suitable acquisition target.
The rapid decline in liquidity suggests that the company may soon face a funding gap that could force a premature liquidation or necessitate dilutive financing. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate closely, as the current trajectory indicates that the firm's operational runway is effectively exhausted.
Misleading Reliance on P/E Multiples
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for RANG, as it obscures the reality that the company generates no revenue and that reported net income is heavily distorted by non-cash changes in derivative warrant liabilities rather than actual operational performance.
Analysts should instead focus on the net asset value of the trust and the remaining cash balance available for operations. Relying on earnings-based multiples for a pre-merger shell company provides a false sense of security and fails to capture the significant risk of total capital loss.