Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -15.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -60.3%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $260M | $390M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $3.0B | $1.1B | $584M | $71M | $163M |
| Enterprise Value | $207M | $337M | $1.1B | $2.5B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $2.8B | $978M | $514M | $41M | $182M |
| P/E Ratio → | -15.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.95 | 1.41 | 2.57 | 5.11 | 2.72 | 3.04 | 6.03 | 3.63 | 3.01 | 1.48 | 2.23 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -60.3% | -60.3% | -54.1% | -50.0% | -47.0% | -35.3% | -36.2% | -33.2% | -61.6% | -48.8% | -47.1% |
| ROA | -52.0% | -52.0% | -47.3% | -43.9% | -42.3% | -31.1% | -30.5% | -26.7% | -42.2% | -25.5% | -35.3% |
| ROIC | -62.4% | -62.4% | -52.1% | -46.7% | -54.6% | -48.9% | -46.6% | -38.9% | -74.8% | -36.2% | -51.9% |
| ROCE | -58.1% | -58.1% | -54.4% | -50.4% | -45.4% | -32.4% | -29.8% | -25.8% | -42.7% | -24.3% | -36.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 1.04 | 0.67 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.19 | -0.30 | -0.06 | -0.24 | -0.46 | -0.47 | -0.45 | -0.36 | -0.61 | 0.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -116.99 | -116.99 | -136.19 | -129.98 | -115.22 | -27.71 | -17.59 | -14.96 | -13.11 | -5.65 | -29.22 |
Net cash position: cash ($78M) exceeds total debt ($25M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.38 | 6.38 | 9.30 | 7.80 | 9.29 | 17.69 | 14.94 | 16.81 | 13.60 | 24.83 | 17.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.38 | 6.38 | 9.30 | 7.80 | 9.29 | 17.69 | 14.94 | 16.81 | 13.60 | 24.83 | 17.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.25 | 6.25 | 9.15 | 7.69 | 9.10 | 17.54 | 14.80 | 16.61 | 13.38 | 24.57 | 17.54 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $111M | $95M | $84M | $68M | $63M | $55M | $49M | $39M | $7M | $7M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RCKT stock.
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -15.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -60.3%. The historical average is -64.6%.
Based on historical data, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -15.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Zero revenue binary clinical dependency
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Book Value Pricing Suggests Pipeline Doubt
RCKT trades at a P/B of 0.98 — below book value — despite $1.5B in accumulated deficits and zero revenue, suggesting the market assigns minimal franchise value to a pipeline that has not yet produced a commercial product, per recent SEC filings.
The P/E of -1.22 is arithmetically meaningless given negative trailing earnings, but the P/B of 0.98 is analytically revealing: investors are pricing the equity at roughly par to book, which includes $39.2M in goodwill that has sat static for ten consecutive quarters. For a pre-commercial gene therapy company, a sub-1.0 P/B implies the market is discounting the entire intangible pipeline as having near-zero recoverable value in a downside scenario, rather than assigning it option value as typically seen in earlier-stage peers like CRSP at 2.41x book. This warrants monitoring: any clinical catalyst would need to materially reset the market's implied franchise valuation, while a goodwill impairment could push reported book value — and the P/B ratio — lower still.
Negative ROIC Reflects Capital Incineration Phase
ROIC has been consistently negative, ranging from -11.3% in 2024Q1 to -18.4% in 2026Q2, indicating that every dollar of invested capital has been destroyed rather than compounded — a pattern typical of pre-revenue biotech but deteriorating over the last two quarters, per RCKT's reported figures.
The ROIC trajectory shows a clear erosion from the -11.3% level seen in early 2024 to the -18.4% posted in 2026Q2, suggesting that despite SG&A reductions, the ratio of operating losses to invested capital has worsened — the company is destroying more capital per dollar deployed. The ROE spike to +40.6% in 2026Q2 appears to be entirely an artifact of the approximately $170M non-operating gain and should be disregarded as a measure of earning power. True economic return on capital remains deeply negative, and the trend suggests the compounding equation will only turn positive once clinical programs convert to revenue.
Near-Zero Leverage Preserves Financing Capacity
D/E has remained between 0.06 and 0.10 for ten consecutive quarters, and the 279.7x interest coverage in 2026Q2 reflects a one-time gain rather than operating cash generation, suggesting RCKT retains meaningful balance sheet capacity to raise non-dilutive capital if needed, per reported filings.
Total debt of approximately $25M against equity of $400M+ represents a leverage profile that is essentially undeployed — the D/E of 0.07 in 2026Q2 leaves substantial headroom if management chooses to access credit markets rather than issue equity. The interest coverage ratio of 279.7x in 2026Q2 is an artifact of the non-recurring gain and should be normalized against the historical pattern of negative coverage (ranging from -11.9x to -146.9x), which reflects the fact that RCKT has been servicing interest from its balance sheet rather than from operating income. Investors should note that while debt service is currently trivially manageable, future financing capacity may be constrained by market conditions for pre-commercial gene therapy companies.
Cash Rebound Drives Current Ratio to 9.24x
The current ratio surged from 6.12 in 2026Q1 to 9.24 in 2026Q2 — its highest level in ten quarters — driven primarily by a $175M cash swing that appears tied to non-operating inflows rather than operating improvement, based on RCKT's balance sheet disclosures.
The sharp liquidity improvement masks an underlying pattern of cash depletion: total assets fell from $527.7M at end-2024Q4 to $285.4M at 2026Q1 before rebounding to $423.1M, suggesting the 2026Q2 balance sheet strength may not be self-sustaining absent additional financing or partnership inflows. With cash burn averaging roughly $48M per quarter over the last ten periods, the current cash position implies a runway of approximately 10-12 quarters under current operating patterns — comfortable in absolute terms but insufficient to fund a Phase 3 program without external capital. The quick ratio being identical to the current ratio (9.24x) reflects the fact that virtually all current assets are cash and equivalents, leaving no inventory dependency.
RCKT Outperforms Gene Therapy Peers on ROE
RCKT's trailing ROE of approximately -14% to -18% is materially better than peers CRSP (-24.4%), NTLA (-57.8%), and EDIT (-196.6%), suggesting more disciplined capital allocation relative to the gene therapy cohort — though the 2026Q2 positive ROE is distorted by a non-recurring gain.
The peer comparison reveals RCKT's ROIC of -18.4% (2026Q2) sits between CRSP (-22.3%) and BEAM (-31.1%), placing it in the middle of the gene therapy cohort on capital destruction intensity. Notably, RCKT's D/E of 0.07 is among the lowest in the peer group — below CRSP (0.21), NTLA (0.14), and dramatically below EDIT (2.81) — suggesting a more conservative balance sheet posture that may provide greater resilience in a prolonged funding drought. However, the P/B of 0.98 is the lowest in the peer set, implying the market is assigning less franchise value per dollar of book to RCKT than to any comparable — a discount that appears disproportionate to RCKT's relatively better ROE trajectory and warrants further investigation.
P/E Ratio Is Analytically Misleading for RCKT
The P/E of -1.22, while technically computable, is analytically meaningless for a pre-commercial biotech with zero revenue and negative operating income, and any investor relying on this metric should instead evaluate RCKT on cash runway and pipeline catalyst timing, per reported filings.
For a company like RCKT with zero revenue, a negative P/E ratio tells the analyst nothing about relative value — it merely reflects that losses exist, not how the market prices the underlying pipeline optionality. The more relevant metrics for this business model are cash burn rate (~$48M/quarter), current cash position ($224.5M), and runway in quarters — which together suggest approximately 10-12 quarters of visibility. The P/B of 0.98 may appear cheap in isolation, but with $39.2M in goodwill that has not been impaired despite $1.5B in accumulated deficits, the true book value may be overstated; investors should monitor cash runway against clinical milestone timing and non-dilutive financing catalysts rather than relying on earnings-based multiples that assume a functioning income statement.