Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -131.4%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3M | $2M | $15M | $41M | $43M | $403M | $122M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-6809981 | $-7966987 | $9M | $29M | $38M | $402M | $118M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.07 | 0.22 | 3.22 | 6.20 | 40.89 | — | 35.73 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -131.4% | -131.4% | -264.9% | -3.1% | -2272.8% | -723.8% | -95.7% | — |
| ROA | -97.9% | -97.9% | -159.7% | -1.4% | -287.0% | -359.8% | -70.2% | -16.0% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -126.9% | -126.9% | -140.5% | -224.8% | -2280.1% | -2198.2% | -641.7% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.12 | -1.38 | -1.80 | -4.99 | — | -1.32 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | -286.18 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($11M) exceeds total debt ($746784)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.41 | 5.41 | 3.43 | 2.18 | 1.22 | 0.89 | 1.35 | — |
| Quick Ratio | 5.41 | 5.41 | 3.43 | 2.18 | 1.22 | 0.89 | 1.35 | — |
| Cash Ratio | 5.36 | 5.36 | 3.40 | 2.15 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.46 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $620800 | $171510 | $14290 | $1123 | $588 | $181 | $542 |
Binary clinical trial failure
As reported in financial statements, REVB's operating margin remains deeply negative at -65.0% in 2024Q4, illustrating that the company's current cost structure is entirely disconnected from revenue generation as it prioritizes clinical development over immediate profitability in a high-risk biotechnology environment.
The absence of gross margin stability suggests that the firm has yet to achieve any commercial scale, rendering traditional profitability metrics largely irrelevant for assessing operational health. Investors should monitor the ratio of R&D expenses to total cash burn as the primary indicator of whether management is effectively allocating capital toward value-creating clinical milestones.
Based on recent SEC filings, REVB's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, reaching 10.02 in 2026Q1, yet this metric is misleadingly high due to the rapid depletion of cash reserves relative to the ongoing, non-discretionary clinical trial expenditures required to maintain the company's regulatory standing.
While the high current ratio might appear to signal a strong liquidity position, it primarily reflects the company's reliance on recent capital raises rather than operational efficiency. The rapid contraction of this ratio over time warrants further investigation into the firm's ability to sustain operations without further dilutive financing.
According to historical balance sheet data, REVB maintains a negligible debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06 as of 2026Q1, which suggests that the company has avoided traditional debt financing in favor of equity-based capital raises to fund its ongoing research and development activities.
The lack of significant debt is a double-edged sword, as it avoids restrictive covenants but leaves the company entirely dependent on the equity markets for survival. This structure implies that shareholders bear the full brunt of clinical failure risk, as there is no debt-based cushion to absorb operational volatility.
The price-to-book ratio, currently at 0.07, is frequently misapplied to REVB, as it fails to account for the fact that the company's primary assets are intangible clinical-stage intellectual property rather than tangible book value, which is rapidly being eroded by persistent operational losses.
Investors should instead focus on the cash runway and the probability-weighted net present value of the pipeline, as the book value provides no meaningful insight into the firm's future commercial viability. Relying on P/B in this context may lead to a false sense of value based on accounting artifacts rather than clinical potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying REVB stock.
Revelation Biosciences, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Revelation Biosciences, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -131.4%. The historical average is -123.8%.
Based on historical data, Revelation Biosciences, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.