Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $3M | $160M | $983M | $877M | $40.8B | $3.2B | $32.4B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $111.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | $12M | $153M | $980M | $875M | $40.8B | $3.2B | $32.4B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $111.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | 179458.36 | 1474.49 | — | 5125.00 | 20500.00 | 65207.14 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.33 | 0.57 | 6.81 | 25.24 | 22.33 | 858.45 | 70.12 | 842.39 | 69.23 | 53.34 | 2104.98 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | 129.67 | 84.93 | 3456.57 | 352.91 | 5701.83 | 378.58 | 415.51 | 14968.72 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 2148.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 128281.34 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 1793.13 | — | — | 18779.88 | 72920.27 | 17167.01 | — | 109576.69 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.79 | 6.52 | 25.17 | 22.27 | 858.52 | 70.19 | 842.43 | 69.25 | 53.35 | 2104.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 36747.66 | 1865.04 | — | 2459.69 | 2653.98 | 35333.89 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 47047.18 | 1056.97 | — | 3068.57 | 3236.40 | 36768.73 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 2142.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 128280.90 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -29.9% | -29.9% | 20.3% | 21.2% | 23.4% | 22.8% | 26.8% | 21.2% | 25.3% | 25.8% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -181.0% | -181.0% | -59.3% | -21.0% | -9.4% | 0.1% | 3.1% | -8.4% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 5.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -365.5% | -365.5% | -99.0% | -21.9% | -11.8% | 0.5% | 4.7% | -7.4% | 1.4% | 0.3% | 3.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -95.3% | -41.9% | 2.2% | 29.4% | -40.3% | 7.7% | 2.0% | 26.1% |
| ROA | -103.5% | -103.5% | -101.1% | -38.5% | -18.3% | 0.8% | 11.2% | -19.8% | 5.0% | 1.2% | 15.4% |
| ROIC | -75.4% | -75.4% | — | -94.1% | -23.7% | 0.4% | 11.0% | -29.7% | 8.9% | 9.7% | 32.9% |
| ROCE | — | — | -2032.8% | -74.4% | -31.9% | 0.6% | 15.7% | -41.6% | 12.7% | 12.9% | 39.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.53 | 0.07 | 0.91 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 9.71 | 2.28 | — | 0.74 | 1.18 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | -0.36 | -0.21 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.08 | -0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 3.06 | 1.81 | — | 0.58 | 0.51 | -0.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -5.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.44 |
| Interest Coverage | -19.30 | -19.30 | -11.91 | -20.55 | -6.53 | 1.49 | 6.42 | -12.83 | 4.07 | 3.29 | 11.51 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 1.43 | 2.48 | 1.46 | 1.68 | 1.45 | 2.94 | 2.30 | 2.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 1.20 | 0.65 | 1.30 | 0.63 | 1.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.55 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.35 | 1.28 | 1.40 | 2.36 | 1.39 | 2.05 | 2.32 | 3.81 | 4.62 | 4.55 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 8.56 | 4.46 | 3.31 | 3.30 | 6.28 | 3.99 | 5.76 | 5.29 | 7.20 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.20 | 82.12 | 71.04 | 21.49 | 95.36 | 71.50 | 18.59 | 16.16 | 13.35 | 11.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.1% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 53.0% | 30.3% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 53.0% | 30.3% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $9M | $5M | $3M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Insolvency and liquidity exhaustion
Based on reported figures, RIME trades at a P/S multiple of 0.33, which suggests that the market has largely abandoned expectations for a successful turnaround, pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a viable technology entity following its recent rebranding efforts.
The lack of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples underscores the absence of positive earnings or cash flow to support traditional valuation frameworks. Investors should monitor whether the current low sales multiple represents a deep-value opportunity or a realistic assessment of the company's terminal value in a declining hardware market.
As reported in recent financial statements, RIME's gross margin plummeted to -28.2% in 2026Q1, a figure that highlights the company's inability to cover basic production and logistics costs, effectively rendering the core hardware business model value-destructive at the gross profit level.
This negative margin trend suggests that the company is likely liquidating inventory at a loss or facing prohibitive logistics costs that exceed the retail price of its products. Such performance indicates that the current earning power is non-existent, and any potential for future profitability remains entirely dependent on a successful pivot to high-margin software services.
According to quarterly data, ROIC has deteriorated to -54.6% in 2026Q1, reflecting a severe and persistent inability to generate returns on invested capital that would justify the company's ongoing operational expenditures and historical capital allocation decisions.
The consistent negative trend in ROIC over the last ten quarters suggests that the company is not merely struggling with cyclical headwinds but is experiencing a structural decay in its ability to deploy capital effectively. This trend warrants further investigation into whether any remaining capital is being allocated to projects with a realistic path toward positive returns.
Based on the provided financial data, RIME's asset turnover has languished at 0.15 in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is failing to generate sufficient revenue from its existing asset base, which further exacerbates the pressure on its already thin liquidity position.
The inability to optimize the cash conversion cycle, combined with low asset turnover, suggests that inventory is likely becoming obsolete before it can be sold. This inefficiency appears to be a primary driver of the company's cash burn, as capital remains trapped in slow-moving hardware that fails to contribute to top-line growth.
As reported in recent filings, the current ratio has fallen to 0.90 in 2026Q1, signaling that the company's short-term assets are no longer sufficient to cover its immediate liabilities, which places the firm in a highly vulnerable position regarding its ongoing solvency.
The rapid decline in the quick ratio suggests that the company lacks the liquid resources to navigate even minor operational disruptions or seasonal demand shifts. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional financing, as the current liquidity profile appears insufficient to support the business through a prolonged restructuring period.
The most commonly misapplied metric for RIME is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which obscures the company's negative gross margins and fails to account for the fact that each additional dollar of revenue currently increases the company's total operating loss.
Investors should instead focus on the contribution margin or the growth of recurring subscription revenue, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's potential for future viability. Relying on P/S in a negative-margin environment leads to a dangerous overestimation of the company's intrinsic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RIME stock.
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. The historical average is 114.9x.
Based on historical data, Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. has -29.9% gross margin and -181.0% operating margin.